ELEquant: a developmental framework and validation of forensic and conservation real-time PCR assays
A framework for the development and validation of a qPCR assay for species identification and DNA quantification for conservation and forensic purposes is presented. Elephants are commonly poached for their ivory tusks, which is the primary driving force behind their endangered status. In addition to poaching and trade, habitat loss due to logging and mining has also resulted in loss of elephants. Crimes against animals can be deterred and/or further prosecution sought through testing with forensic genetic techniques. The creation of novel genetic assays can greatly impact wildlife forensic science investigations in identifying the species. Molecular genetic techniques can help enforce conservation efforts; however, they must be properly developed and validated to be of evidentiary quality for court systems. African and Asian elephant buccal cells were used as model in this work. The assay provides a method to differentiate biological fluids of both genera of elephants simultaneously. It can be used for identification of elephant derived products and presents valuable quantification for optimized further testing, such as microsatellite detection.
KeywordsqPCR Standards African elephant Loxodonta africana Asian elephant Elephas maximus
We thank Merideth Fayman, Caitlin Hoey, and Meredith Rohrbaugh for early contributions to this research project. This work would not be possible without DNA sources from Six Flags: Safari Off Road Adventure, the Cincinnati Zoo, the St. Louis Zoo, the Northeast Wildlife DNA Laboratory, Quakertown Veterinary Clinic, and the Brandywine Zoo. Thank you for your contributions. Thank you to Arcadia University’s Master of Forensic Science Program and the Department of Biological and Physical Sciences at Keystone College for providing funds towards this project.
This work has been supported by Arcadia University’s Master of Forensic Science program, Keystone College’s Department of Biological and Physical Sciences, and University of the Sciences’ Department of Biological Sciences.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Research involving human participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 4.Sukumar R (2006) A brief review of the status, distribution and biology of wild Asian elephants Elephas maximus. Int Zoo Yearb 40(1):1–8Google Scholar
- 5.Archie EA, Chiyo PI (2011) Elephant behaviour and conservation: social relationships, the effects of poaching, and genetic tools for management. Mol Ecol 21(3):765–778Google Scholar
- 6.Iyengar A (2014) Forensic DNA analysis for animal protection and biodiversity conservation: a review. J Nat Conserv 22:195–205Google Scholar
- 7.Linacre A, Tobe SS (2011) An overview to the investigative approach to species testing in wildlife forensic science. Investig Genet 2(1):2–9Google Scholar
- 8.Cooper JE, Cooper ME (2013) Wildlife forensic investigation: principles and practice. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kitpipit T, Thongjued K, Penchart K, Ouitavon K, Chotigeat W (2017) Mini-SNaPshot multiplex assays authenticate elephant ivory and simultaneously identify the species origin. Forensic Sci Int Genet 27:106–115Google Scholar
- 11.Alacs EA, Georges A, FitzSimmons NN (2010) DNA detective: a review of molecular approaches to wildlife forensics. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 6(3):180–194Google Scholar
- 14.Haijibabaei M, Singer GAC, Hebert PDN, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends Genet 23(4):167–172Google Scholar
- 15.Li R (2015) Forensic biology, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 16.James SH, Nordby JJ, Bell S (2014) Forensic science: an introduction to scientific and investigative techniques, 4th edn. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Muller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55(4):611–622. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 Google Scholar
- 18.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215(3):403–410Google Scholar
- 19.Vallone PM, Butler JM (2004) AutoDimer: a screening tool for primer-dimer and hairpin structures. Biotechniques 37(2):226–231Google Scholar
- 21.Mailand C, Wasser SK (2007) Isolation of DNA from small amounts of elephant ivory. Nat Protoc 2(9):2228Google Scholar
- 22.Comstock KE, Wasser SK, Ostrander EA (2000) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci identified in the African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Mol Ecol 9(7):1004–1006. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00939-8.x Google Scholar
- 24.Comstock KE, Georgiadis NJ, Pecon-Slattery J, Roca AL, Ostrander EA, O’Brien SJ, Wasser SK (2002) Patterns of molecular genetic variation among African elephant populations. Mol Ecol 11(12):2489–2498Google Scholar
- 25.Roca AL, Georgiadis NJ, O’Brien SJ (2005) .onuclear genomic dissociation in African elephant species. Nat Genet 37(1):96–100Google Scholar
- 27.Young CC, Burghoff RL, Keim LG, Minak-Bernero V, Lute JR, Hinton SM (1993) Polyvinylpyrrolidone-agarose gel electrophoresis purification of polymerase chain reaction-amplifiable DNA from soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(6):1972–1974Google Scholar
- 28.Wilson IG (1997) Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(10):3741–3751Google Scholar