Advertisement

Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 479–488 | Cite as

Nested and TaqMan® probe based quantitative PCR for the diagnosis of Ca. Phytoplasma in coconut palms

  • R. Ramjegathesh
  • G. Karthikeyan
  • D. Balachandar
  • K. Ramaraju
  • L. RajendranEmail author
  • T. Raguchander
  • R. Samiyappan
Original Article
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

The root (wilt) disease caused by phytoplasma (Ca. Phytoplasma) is one of the major and destructive occurs in coconut gardens of Southern India. As this organism could not be cultured in vitro, the early detection in the palm is very much challenging. Hence, proper early diagnosis and inoculum assessment relay mostly on the molecular techniques namely nested and quantitative PCR (qPCR). So, the present study qPCR assay conjugated with TaqMan® probe was developed which is a rapid, sensitive method to detect the phytoplasma. For the study, samples from different parts of infected coconut palms viz., spindle leaflets, roots and the insect vector—leaf hopper (Proutista moesta) were collected and assessed by targeting 16S rRNA gene. Further, nested PCR has been carried out using p1/p7 and fU5/rU3 primers and resulted in the amplification product size of 890 bp. From this amplified product, specifically a target of 69 bp from the 16S rRNA gene region has been detected through primers conjugated with Taqman probe in a step one instrument. The results indicated that the concentration of phytoplasma was more in spindle leaflets (8.9 × 105 g of tissue) followed by roots (7.4 × 105 g of tissue). Thus, a qPCR approach for detection and quantification of coconut phytoplasma was more advantageous than other PCR methods in terms of sensitivity and also reduced risk of cross contamination in the samples. Early diagnosis and quantification will pave way for the healthy coconut saplings selection and management under field conditions.

Keywords

Coconut Phytoplasma Root (wilt) disease 16S rRNA gene Quantitative PCR TaqMan® probe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi for financial support to carry out this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrios V (2005) Plant Pathology, 5th edn. Academic press, New York, p 922Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angelini E, Bianchi GL, Filippin L, Morassutti C, Borgo M (2007) A new TaqMan® method for the identification of phytoplasmas associated with grapevine yellows by real-time PCR assay. J Microbiol Methods 68:613–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berges R, Rott M, Seemuller E (2000) Range of phytoplasma concentration in various plant hosts as determined by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology 90:1145–1152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertaccini A, Uibio M, Stetani E (1995) Detection and molecular characterization of phytoplasma infecting grapevine in Liguria (Italy). Phytopathol Mediterrnea 34:137–141Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bisognin C, Schneider B, Salm H, Grando MS, Jarausch W, Moll E, Seemuller E (2008) Apple proliferation resistance in apomictic rootstocks and its relationship to phytoplasma concentration and simple sequence repeat genotypes. Phytopathology 98:153–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broschat TK, Harrison NA, Donselman H (2002) Losses to lethal yellowing cast doubt on coconut cultivar resistance. Palms 46:185–189Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butler EJ (1908) Report on coconut palm disease in Travancore, vol 9. Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, p 23Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coconut Development Board (2015-2016) Directorate of economics and statistics, ministry of agriculture, Govt. of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cordova I, Oropeza C, Almeyda H, Harrison N (2000) First report of a phytoplasma associated leaf yellowing syndrome of ‘Palma Jipi’ (Carloduvica palmate) plant in Southern Mexico. Plant Dis 84:807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crosslin JM, Vandemark GJ, Munyaneza JE (2006) Development of a real-time, quantitative PCR for detection of the Columbia basin potato purple top phytoplasma in plants and beet leafhoppers. Plant Dis 90(5):663–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D’Amelio R, Massa N, Gamalero E, D’Agostino Sampo S, Berta G, Faoro F, Iriti M, Bosco D, Marzachi C (2007) Preliminary results on the evaluation of the effects of elicitors of plant resistance on chrysanthemum yellows phytoplasma infection. Bull Insectol 60:317–318Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deng S, Hiruki CM (1990) Molecular cloning and detection of DNA of the mycoplasma—like organisms associated with clover proliferation. Can J Plant Pathol 12:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deng S, Hiruki CM (1991) Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from culturable and non culturable mollicutes. J Microbiol Methods 14:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doi U, Teranaka M, Yora K, Asuyama H (1967) Mycoplasma or PLT group like microorganisms found in the phloem elements of plants infected with mulberry dwarf, potato witches broom, aster yellows or paulownia witches broom. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 33:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doyle J, Doyle J (2005) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edwin BT, Mohankumar C (2007) Molecular identification of Proutista moesta as the vector and the phylogenetic analysis of KWD phytoplasma. Indian J Biotechnol 6:560–563Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Galetto L, Bosco B, Marzachi C (2005) Universal and group-specific real-time PCR diagnosis of flavescence dorée (16Sr-V), bois noir (16Sr-XII) and apple proliferation (16Sr-X) phytoplasmas from field-collected plant hosts and insect vectors. Ann Appl Biol 147:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galetto L, Marzachi C (2010) Real-time PCR diagnosis and quantification of phytoplasmas. Phytoplasmas, genomes, plant hosts and vectors (eds) Weintraub PG, Jones P CAB International, Wallingford. pp 1–18Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedure for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gundersen DE, Lee IM (1996) Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer sets. Phytopathol Mediterr 35:144–151Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harrison NA, Cordova I, Richardson P, DiBonito R (1999) Detection and diagnosis of lethal yellowing. In: Oropeza C, Verdeil JL, Ashburner GR, Cardena R, Santamaria JM (eds) Current advances in coconut biotechnology. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harrison NA, Narvaez M, Almeyda H, Cordova I, Carpio ML, Oropeza C (2002) First report of group 16SrIV phytoplasmas infecting coconut palms with leaf yellowing symptoms on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Plant Pathol 51(6):808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hodgetts J, Boonham N, Mumford R, Dickinson M (2009) Panel of 23S rRNA gene-based real-time PCR assays for improved universal and group specific detection of phytoplasmas. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2945–2950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horz HP, Vianna ME, Gomes BPFA, Conrads G (2005) Evaluation of universal probes and primer sets for assessing total bacterial load in clinical samples: general implications and practical use in endodontic antimicrobial therapy. J Clin Microbiol 43:5332–5337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jones P (2005) Coconut lethal yellowing disease; development of new diagnostic tools and laboratory support to promote their application. R8309 Crop protection programme. 5th SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee IM, Gundersen DE, Davis RE, Chiykowski LN (1992) Identification and analysis of a genomic strain cluster of mycoplasma like organisms associated with Canadian peach (eastem) X-disease, western X-disease, and clover yellow edge. J Bacteriol 174:6694–6698CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li W, Levy LJS,. Hartung (2009) Quantitative distribution of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus plants with citrus huan-glongbing. Phytopathology 99:139–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lorenz KH, Schneider B, Ahrens U, Seemuller E (1995) Detection of the apple proliferation and pear decline phytoplasmas by PCR amplification of ribosomal and nonribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 85:771–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martini M, Loi N, Ermacora P, Carraro L, Pastore M (2007) Real-time PCR method for detection and quantification of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum’ in its natural hosts. Bull Insectol 60(2):251–252Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marzachi C (2006) Molecular diagnosis of phytoplasmas. Arab J Plant Prot 24:139–142Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mathen K, Rajan P, Nair CPR, Sasikala M, Gunasekaran M, Govindankutty MP, Solomon JJ (1990) Transmission of root (wilt) disease to coconut seedlings through Stephanitis typica (Distant) (Heteroptera: Tingidae). Tro Agri 67:69–73Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mpunami A, Tymon A, Jones P, Dickinson MJ (2000) Identification of potential vectors of the coconut lethal disease phytoplasma. Plant Pathol 49(3):355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mumford R, Boonham N, Tomlinson J, Barker I (2006) Advances in molecular phytodiagnostics—new solutions for old problems. Eur J Plant Pathol 116:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nagaraj AN, Menon KPV (1956) Note on the etiology of the wilt (root) disease of coconut palms in Travancore, Cochin. Indian Coconut J 9:161–165Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nejat N, Sijam K, Abdullah SNA, Vadamalai G, Dickinson M (2009) Phytoplasma associated with disease of coconut in Malaysia: phylogenetic groups and host plant species. Plant Pathol 58(6):1152–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nejat N, Sijam K, Abdullah SNA, Vadamalai G, Sidek Z, Dickinson M (2010) Development of a TaqMan real-time PCR for sensitive detection of the novel phytoplasma associated with coconut yellow decline in Malaysia. J Plant Pathol 92(3):769–773Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rajan P (2011) Transmission of coconut root (wilt) disease through plant hopper, Proutista moesta Westwood (Homoptera:Derbidae). Pest Manag Hortic Ecosyst 17(1):1–5Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rajan P, Nair CPR, Solomon JJ, Sasikala M (2000) Insect transmission of root (wilt) disease of coconut. Indian Phytopathol 53(3):370Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Radha K, Lal SB (1972) Diagnostic symptoms of root (wilt) disease of coconut. Indian J Agricl Sci 42:410–413Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ramjegathesh R, Karthikeyan G, Rajendran L, Johnson I, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R (2012) Root (wilt) disease of coconut palms in South Asia—an overview. Archiv Phytopathol Plant Prot 45(20):2485–2493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schaad NWS, Frederick RD (2002) Real-time PCR and its application for rapid plant disease diagnostics. Can J Plant Pathol 24:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schneider B, Seemuller E, Smart CD, Kirkpatrick BC (1995) Phylogenetic classification of plant pathogenic mycoplasma-like organisms or phytoplasmas. In: Razin S, Tully GJ (eds) Molecular and diagnostic procedures in mycoplasmology. Academic press, New York, pp 369–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schuiling M, Kaiza DA, Mpunami A (1992) Lethal disease of coconut palm in Tanzania II: history, distribution and epidemiology. Oleagineux 47:516–521Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shanta P, Joseph T, Lal SB (1964) Transmission of root (wilt) disease of coconut. Indian Coconut J 18:25–28Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sietepu D, Maninandan H, Mawikere J (1988) Outbreak of a coconut wilt disease in central Kalimantan. In: UNDP/FAO Integrated coconut pest control project, Annual Report 1988. Balai Penelituian Kelapa, Manado, North SulawesiGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Srinivasan N, Koshy PK, Amma PGK, Sasikala M, Gunasekara M, Solomon JJ (2001) Appraisal of coconut (wilt) and heavy incidence of this disease in cumbum valley of Tamil Nadu. Indian Coconut J 31(1):1–5Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Solomon JJ (2001) Final report-Role of phytoplasma in root (wilt) disease of coconut. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kayangulam, p 48Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Torres E, Bertolini E, Cambra M, Monton C, Martin MP (2005) Real-time PCR for simultaneous and quantitave detection of quarantine phytoplasmas from apple proliferation (16SrX) group. Mol Cell Probes 19:334–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wally O, El Hadrami A, Khadhair AH, Adam LR, Shinners-Carnelley T, Elliott B, Daayf F (2008) DNA sequencing reveals false positives during the detection of aster yellows phytoplasmas in leafhoppers. Sci Hortic 116:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Warokka JS, Jones P, Dickinson MJ (2006) Detection of phytoplasmas associated with Kalimantan wilt disease of coconut by the polymerase chain reaction. J Littri 2(4):154–160Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wheeler BE (1969) An introduction to plant diseases. John Willey and Sons Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural MicrobiologyTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations