Linkage disequilibrium between fitness QTLs and the sugary1 allele of maize
- 121 Downloads
Understanding how biological systems evolve across changing conditions has been a crucial focus of research. Mutations change the genetic context in which genes are expressed and yet the mechanisms underlying mutation fitness are still unclear. We use the sweet corn mutant sugary1 (su1) as a model for understanding the genetic regulation of mutant fitness, focusing on the mutant × genotype interaction across diverse environments. In a previous work, we identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting fitness in a mapping population of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between field corn (B73) × sweet corn (P39 or IL14h) parents; however, the epistatic effects of these QTLs on su1 fitness were not investigated. In the present study, we estimated fitness for two seed production environments. Viability of su1 is under genetic and environmental controls, regulated by multiple genes with minor contributions, and these genes depend on the genotype into which the mutation is introduced and on the environment. Some QTLs were in linkage disequilibrium with the maize gene Su1 and had epistatic effects on su1 fitness. These QTLs could be used by sweet corn breeders by combining the most favorable alleles associated with su1 viability in breeding new genotypes from field × sweet corn crosses. These results also have implications for mutagenesis breeding or genome editing because the epistatic effects of the target genome on the new alleles generated by these techniques could affect the success of the breeding program.
KeywordsZea mays L. Sweet corn Epistasis sugary1
Molecular data was provided by the Maize Diversity Project (https://www.panzea.org/). Seed was provided by the North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station of the USA.
This work was supported by the Spanish Plan for Research and Development (grant number AGL2016-77628-R); FEDER (grant number AGL2016-77628-R); and the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (University of Wisconsin-Madison).
- Cisneros-Lopez ME, Mendoza-Onofre LE, Zavaleta-Mancera HA, Ginzalez-Hernandez VA, Mora-Aguilera G, Cordova-Tellez L, Hernandez -Martinez M (2010) Pollen–pistil interaction, pistil histology and seed production in A × B grain sorghum crosses under chilling field temperatures. J Agric Sci 148:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Galinat WC (1978) The inheritance of some traits essential to maize and teosinte. In: Walden DB (ed) Maize breeding and genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 93–111Google Scholar
- Juvik JA, Gad GY, Tae-Ho H, Tadmor Y, Azanza F, Tracy WF, Barzur A, Rocheford TR (2003) QTL influencing kernel chemical composition and seedling stand establishment in sweet corn with the shrunken2 and sugary enhancer1 endosperm mutations. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:864–875Google Scholar
- McMullen MD, Kresovich S, Villeda HS, Bradbury P, Li H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, Thornsberry J, Acharya C, Bottoms C, Brown P, Browne C, Eller M, Guill K, Harjes C, Kroon D, Lepak N, Mitchell SE, Peterson B, Pressoir G, Romero S, Rosas MO, Salvo S, Yates H, Hanson M, Jones E, Smith S, Glaubitz JC, Goodman M, Ware D, Holland JB, Buckler ES (2009) Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325:737–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Revilla P, Malvar RA, Abuin MC, Ordás B, Soengas P, Ordás A (2000) Genetic background effect on germination of su1 maize and viability of the su1 allele. Maydica 45:109–111Google Scholar
- Revilla P, Rodriguez VM, Malvar RA, Butron A, Ordás A (2006b) Comparison among sweet corn heterotic patterns. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:388–392Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc. (2009) SAS online doc, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
- Tracy WF (1994) Sweet corn. In: Hallauer AR (ed) Specialty types of maize. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 147–187Google Scholar
- Tracy WF (2001) Sweet corn. In: Hallauer AR (ed) Specialty corns, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 155–197Google Scholar