Advertisement

Brain gray matter correlates of general psychological need satisfaction: a voxel-based morphometry study

  • Woogul LeeEmail author
  • Johnmarshall ReeveEmail author
Original Paper
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Basic psychological needs lie at the heart of the self-determination theory (SDT) explanatory framework. SDT researchers have recently undertaken neuroscientific programs of research to investigate the neural bases of psychological need satisfaction, and many have done so by using functional neuroimaging data collection methods. According to these studies, the activities of the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), insula, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) represent central neural mechanisms of psychological need satisfaction. These findings led us to now investigate the possibility that people might possess individual differences in the capacity to experience need satisfaction and that these individual differences would be based on differences in their structural brain volumes in these brain areas. Region of interest and whole-brain voxel-based morphometry analyses of 50 participants’ anatomic MRI scans to predict their self-reported need satisfaction over the last year found that only ventral striatum gray matter volume, but not the gray matter volumes of the dorsal striatum, OFC, insula, and ACC, positively correlated with extent of psychological need satisfaction. These neuroanatomic findings offer unique insights to understand the neuroanatomic bases of psychological need satisfaction.

Keywords

Basic psychological need theory Nucleus accumbens Self-determination theory Ventral striatum Voxel-based morphometry 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2012S1A5B5A01025076).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors on this paper has any conflict of interest to report.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

11031_2019_9799_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 kb)

References

  1. Allman, J. M., Tetreault, N. A., Hakeem, A. Y., Manaye, K. F., Semendeferi, K., Erwin, J. M., et al. (2010). The von Economo neurons in frontoinsular and anterior cingulate cortex in great apes and humans. Brain Structure and Function,214, 495–517.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashburner, J. (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage,38, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsky, J., & de Haan, M. (2011). Annual research review: Parenting and children’s brain development: The end of the beginning. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,52, 409–428.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brislin, R. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Bush, G., Vogt, B. A., Holmes, J., Dale, A. M., Greve, D., Jenike, M. A., et al. (2002). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision-making. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America,99, 523–528.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson, J. M., Foti, D., Harmon-Jones, E., & Proudfit, G. H. (2015). Midbrain volume predicts fMRI and ERP measures of reward reactivity. Brain Structure and Function,220, 1861–1866.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, B., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., et al. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion,39, 216–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicchetti, D. (2002). The impact of social experience on neurobiological systems. Cognitive Development,17, 1407–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Review Neuroscience,10, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality,19, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Domenico, S. I., Le, A., Liu, Y., Ayaz, H., & Fournier, M. A. (2016). Basic psychological needs and neurophysiological responsiveness to decisional conflict: An event-related potential study of integrative self-processes. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,16, 848–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: A new frontier in self-determination research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,11, 145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Enzi, B., de Greck, M., Prosch, U., Tempelmann, C., & Northoff, G. (2009). Is our self nothing but reward? Neuronal overlap and distinction between reward and personal relevance and its relation to human personality. PLoS ONE,4, e8429.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods,39, 175–191.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,33, 636–647.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaser, C. & Kurth, F. (2017). Manual Computational Anatomy Toolbox-CAT12. Structural Brain Mapping Group at the Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Jena.Google Scholar
  17. Haber, S. N. (2011). Neuroanatomy of reward: a view from the ventral striatum. In J. A. Gottfried (Ed.), Neurobiology of sensation and reward (Chap. 11) (pp. 235–261). Boca Raton: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammers, A., Allom, R., Koepp, M. J., Free, S. L., Myers, R., Lemieux, L., et al. (2003). Three-dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Human Brain Mapping,19, 224–247.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hashimoto, T., Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sekiguchi, A., Nouchi, R., Kotozaki, Y., et al. (2015). Neuroanatomical correlates of the sense of control: Gray and white matter volumes associated with an internal locus of control. NeuroImage,119, 146–151.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, W. (2017). Insular cortex activity as the neural base of intrinsic motivation. In S. Kim, J. Reeve, & M. Bong (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Recent developments in neuroscience research on human motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 127–148). Bingley: Emerald Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, W., & Reeve, J. (2013). Self-determined, but not non-self-determined, motivation predicts activations in the anterior insular cortex: An fMRI study of personal agency. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,8, 538–545.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, W., & Reeve, J. (2017). Identifying the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation during task performance. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience,17, 939–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Legault, L., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Self-determination, self-regulation, and the brain: Autonomy improves performance by enhancing neuroaffective responsiveness to self-regulation failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,105, 123–138.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Leotti, L. A., & Delgado, M. R. (2011). The inherent reward of choice. Psychological Science,22, 1310–1318.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsden, K. E., Ma, W. J., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Chiu, P. H. (2015). Diminished neural responses predict enhanced intrinsic motivation and sensitivity to external incentive. Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience,15, 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mechelli, A., Price, C. J., Friston, K. J., & Ashburner, J. (2005). Voxel-based morphometry of the human brain: Methods and applications. Current Medical Imaging Reviews,1, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ming, D., Chen, Q., Yang, W., Chen, R., Wei, D., Li, W., et al. (2016). Examining brain structures associated with the motive to achieve success and the motive to avoid failure: A voxel-based morphometry study. Social Neuroscience,11, 38–48.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Montague, P. R., & Berns, G. S. (2002). Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron,36, 265–284.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Murayama, K., Matsumoto, M., Izuma, K., & Matsumoto, K. (2010). Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107, 20911–20916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murayama, K., Matsumoto, M., Izuma, K., Sugiura, A., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., et al. (2015). How self-determined choice facilitates performance: A key role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex,25, 1241–1251.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science,304, 452–454.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., Hornak, J., & Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience,4, 95–102.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Reeve, J., Jang, H.-R., & Jang, H. (2018). Personality-based antecedents of teachers’ autonomy-supportive and controlling motivating styles. Learning and Individual Differences,62, 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2019a). A neuroscientific perspective on basic psychological needs. Journal of Personality,87, 102–114.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2019b). Motivational neuroscience. In R. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of human motivation (Chap. 10) (2nd ed., pp. 355–372). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (in preparation). Autonomy need satisfaction predicts learning: A study in educational neuroscience. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  37. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Cortisol reactivity to a teacher’s motivating style: The biology of being controlled versus supporting autonomy. Motivation and Emotion,35, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rifkin-Graboi, A., Kong, L., Sanmugam, S., Broekman, B. F. P., Chen, H., Wong, E., et al. (2015). Maternal sensitivity, infant limbic structure volume and functional connectivity: A preliminary study. Translational Psychiatry,5, e668.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robbins, T. W., & Everitt, B. J. (1996). Neurobehavioral mechanisms of reward and motivation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology,6, 228–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 749–761.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sethna, V., Pote, I., Wang, S., Gudbrandsen, M., Blais, A., McCusker, C., et al. (2017). Mother-infant interactions and regional brain volumes in infancy: An MRI study. Brain Structure and Function,222, 2379–2388.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. C. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion,36, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheldon, K. M., & Schüler, J. (2011). Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,101, 1106–1123.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Nouchi, R., Sekiguchi, A., Kotozaki, Y., Miyauchi, C. M., et al. (2014). Regional gray matter density is associated with achievement motivation: Evidence from voxel-based morphometry. Brain Structure and Function,219, 71–83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Vansteenkiste, M., Niemec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 16, pp. 105–166). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Young, K. C., Kashdan, T. B., & Macatee, R. (2015). Strength balance and implicit strength measurement: New considerations for research on strengths of character. Journal of Positive Psychology,10, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: Neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience,15, 114–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zougkou, K., Weinstein, N., & Paulmann, S. (2017). ERP correlates of motivating voices: Quality of motivation and time-course matters. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,12, 1687–1700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationKorea National University of EducationCheongju-Si, ChungbukKorea
  2. 2.Institute of Positive Psychology and EducationAustralian Catholic UniversityNorth SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations