Self-control motivationally reconsidered: “Acting” self-controlled is different to “being good” at self-control
Self-control is typically conceptualized as an inherent human skill, focusing on the imperative control of thoughts, feelings, and behavior. In the present research, we scrutinize this understanding by differentiating between an ability self-concept of self-control strength and experiential acts of self-control. Moreover, by taking a motivational perspective, we analyze how much of a role intrapsychic conflict plays in both conceptions of self-control, and with regard to psychological well-being. In cross-sectional Study 1 (N = 228), we compared a typicality measure of experiential acts of imperative self-control with the widely used Self-Control Scale (Tangney et al. in J Pers 72:271–322, 2004). Findings confirm that “being good” at self-control does not correspond to “acting” self-controlled, and that both measures show opposing relationships to intrapsychic conflict, as well as to well-being. In Study 2 (N = 114), we corroborated these findings by using an experience-sampling approach. Multilevel analyses showed that between-person differences (Level 2) in self-control strength were generally unrelated to experiential acts of self-control in everyday life. By contrast, we found a positive Level 2 effect for acting self-controlled. With regard to momentary affect, both between- and within differences (Level 1) in acting self-controlled served as substantial predictors, in addition to momentary self-determination. Other context-dependent effects (i.e., studying vs. leisure time) further emphasize the need to consider motivational interpretations of self-control (strength).
KeywordsIntrapsychic conflict Motivation Self-control Self-determination Well-being Willpower
This research was supported by a research grant of the Bielelder Nachwuchsfond, Bielefeld University, Germany, to Axel Grund.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bembenutty, H., & Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000012344.34008.5c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bertrams, A., & Dickhäuser, O. (2009). Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D) [Measuring dispositional self-control capacity. A German adaptation of the short form of the Self-Control Scale]. Diagnostica, 55, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Carter, E. C., Kofler, L. M., Forster, D. E., & McCullough, M. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edn.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Grund, A., Fries, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2018). Know your preferences: Self-regulation as need-congruent goal selection. Review of General Psychology.Google Scholar
- Grund, A., & Senker, K. (2018). Motivational foundations of self-control and mindfulness and their role in study–leisure conflicts. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2012). Multilevel modeling of categorical outcomes using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hofer, M., Kuhnle, C., Kilian, B., & Fries, S. (2012). Cognitive ability and personality variables as predictors of school grades and test scores in adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 22, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Psychological Science, 7, 450–463.Google Scholar
- Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). [Investigations with a German version of the PANAS]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.Google Scholar
- Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Alienation: Ignoring one’s preferences. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation (pp. 375–390). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Kuhl, J., & Fuhrmann, A. (1998). Decomposing self-regulation and self-control: The volitional components checklist. In J. Heckhausen & C. Dweck (Eds.), Life span perspectives on motivation and control (pp. 15–49). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Milyavskaya, M., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). What’s so great about self-control? Examining the importance of effortful self-control and temptation in predicting real-life depletion and goal attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 603–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616679237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milyavskaya, M., Inzlicht, M., Hope, N., & Koestner, R. (2015). Saying ‘No’ to temptation: ‘Want-to’ motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saunders, B., Milyavskaya, M., Etz, A., Randles, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018, January 19). Reported self-control is not meaningfully associated with inhibition-related executive function: A Bayesian analysis. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BXFSU.
- Schallberger, U. (2005). Kurzskala zur Erfassung der positiven Aktivierung, negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVA-KS) [Scales for assessing positive/negative activation and valence in experience sampling studies]. Research report. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from http://www.research-projects.uzh.ch/p6975.htm.
- Sokolowski, K. (1997). Sequentielle und Imperative Konzepte des Willens [Sequential and imperative theories of volition]. Psychologische Beiträge, 39, 346–369.Google Scholar