Advertisement

The predictive power of low-arousal positive affect

  • Maria D. McManus
  • Jason T. Siegel
  • Jeanne Nakamura
Original Paper

Abstract

Relative to high-arousal positive affect (HAPA), low-arousal positive affect (LAPA) is less likely to be included in research on positive affect and emotion. To gauge the possible cost of omitting LAPA from such research, two studies were conducted assessing the unique contribution of LAPA (e.g., calm, relaxed, content) in predicting variance in measures of well-being and mental health above and beyond HAPA (e.g., alert, excited, enthusiastic). In two studies, multiple regression analyses revealed that LAPA uniquely predicted life satisfaction, depression, feeling good, mindfulness, anxiety, and stress beyond HAPA. Furthermore, the results indicated that when both LAPA and HAPA were in the regression model, LAPA significantly predicted variance in mindfulness, anxiety, and stress whereas HAPA did not. These data indicate that the inclusion of LAPA in research can improve the field’s ability to investigate the causes and effects of positive affectivity. Theoretical perspectives on different types of positive affect and practical implications for researchers are discussed.

Keywords

Low-arousal positive affect High-arousal positive affect Emotion PANAS Contentment 

References

  1. Barrett, L. F. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  2. Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘Liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 9, 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bono, J. E., Foldes, H. J., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1357–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.  https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cordaro, D. T., Brackett, M., Glass, L., & Anderson, C. L. (2016). Contentment: Perceived completeness across cultures and traditions. Review of General Psychology, 20, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2011). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2003). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 111–131.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466503321903544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Denollet, J., & De Vries, J. (2006). Positive and negative affect within the realm of depression, stress and fatigue: The two-factor distress model of the Global Mood Scale (GMS). Journal of Affective Disorders, 91, 171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Depue, R. A., & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: Implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 313–395.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000063.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E. D., & Emmons, R. A. (1985). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eaton, W. W., Smith, C., Ybarra, M., Muntaner, C., & Tien, A. (2004). Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for adults ((3rd ed.), pp. 363–377). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., Boulton, A. J., Firestine, A. M., Van Cappellen, P., Algoe, S. B., Brantley, M. M., … Salzberg, S. (2017). Positive emotion correlates of meditation practice: A comparison of mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness meditation. Mindfulness, 8, 1623–1633.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0735-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 777–796). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2012). How positive affect modulates proactive control: Reduced usage of informative cues under positive affect with low arousal. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 265–278.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1086–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garland, E. L., Geschwind, N., Peeters, F., & Wichers, M. (2015). Mindfulness training promotes upward spirals of positive affect and cognition: Multilevel and autoregressive latent trajectory modeling analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(15), 1–13  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00015.Google Scholar
  20. Gerstman, B. (2016). Correlation. Retrieved from http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/gerstman/StatPrimer/correlation.pdf.
  21. Gilbert, P. (2009). The compassionate mind: A new approach to the challenge of life. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
  22. Gilbert, P. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 6–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Mitra, R., Franks, L., Richter, A., & Rockliff, H. (2008). Feeling safe and content: A specific affect regulation system? Relationship to depression, anxiety, stress, and self-criticism. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 182–191.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760801999461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N., & Nowlis, S. M. (2010). The many shades of rose-colored glasses: An evolutionary approach to the influence of different positive emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 238–250.  https://doi.org/10.1086/651442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grozdanovska, E. (2016). The relationship between national identity, subjective well-being and meaning in life. Suvremena Psihologija, 19, 91–98.  https://doi.org/10.21465/2016-SP-191-08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harmon-Jones, C., Bastian, B., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2016). The discrete emotions questionnaire: A new tool for measuring state self-reported emotions. PLoS ONE, 11, e0159915.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2013). Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 301–307.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413481353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Isen, A. M., & Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 384–388.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keltner, D., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 467–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koelsch, S., Jacobs, A. M., Menninghaus, W., Liebal, K., Klann-Delius, G., von Scheve, C., & Gebauer, G. (2015). The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model. Physics of Life Reviews, 13, 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Koopmann-Holm, B., Sze, J., Ochs, C., & Tsai, J. L. (2013). Buddhist-inspired meditation increases the value of calm. Emotion, 13, 497–505.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kringelbach, M. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2017). The affective core of emotion: Linking pleasure, subjective well-being, and optimal metastability in the brain. Emotion Review, 9, 191–199.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916684558.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, F., & Cui, L. (2018). The effect of the high-approach versus low-approach motivational positive affect on the processing stage of cognitive control: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 29, 41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, L., & Xu, B. (2016). The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on the balance between maintenance and flexibility. Neuroscience Letters, 622, 55–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.04.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). Positive affect and cognitive control: Approach-motivation intensity influences the balance between cognitive flexibility and stability. Psychological Science, 25, 1116–1123.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614525213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Matos, M., Duarte, C., Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Petrocchi, N., Basran, J., & Gilbert, P. (2017). Psychological and physiological effects of compassionate mind training: A pilot randomised controlled study. Mindfulness, 8, 1699–1712.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0745-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Neal, L. B. (2016). Physiological evidence of contentment as a withdrawal-motivated affect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.Google Scholar
  42. Palmer, B., Donaldson, C., & Stough, C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1091–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00215-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Panksepp, J. (2004). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Porges, S. W. (2007). The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psychology, 74, 116–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pressman, S. D., Jenkins, B. N., Kraft-Feil, T. L., Rasmussen, H., & Scheier, M. F. (2017). The whole is not the sum of its parts: Specific types of positive affect influence sleep differentially. Emotion, 17, 778–793.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson, M., McEwan, K., Maratos, F., & Sheffield, D. (2016). Joy and calm: How an evolutionary functional model of affect regulation informs positive emotions in nature. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 308–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0065-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rockliff, H., Karl, A., McEwan, K., Gilbert, J., Matos, M., & Gilbert, P. (2011). Effects of intranasal oxytocin on compassion focused imagery. Emotion, 11, 1388–1396.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023861.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwerdtfeger, A. R., & Gerteis, A. K. S. (2014). The manifold effects of positive affect on heart rate variability in everyday life: Distinguishing within-person and between-person associations. Health Psychology, 33, 1065–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Shiota, M. N. (2014). The evolutionary perspective in positive emotion research. In M. M. Tugade, M. N. Shiota & L. D. Kirby (Eds.), Handbook of positive emotions (pp. 44–59). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  57. Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. I. The positive affects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  58. Tsai, J. L. (2007). Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 242–259.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00043.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288–307.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Waters, A. J., Reitzel, L. R., Cinciripini, P., Li, Y., Marcus, M. T., Vidrine, J. I., & Wetter, D. W. (2009). Associations between mindfulness and implicit cognition and self-reported affect. Substance Abuse, 30, 328–337.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08897070903252080.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa. Retrieved from https://www2.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/clark/panas-x.pdf.
  62. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Behavioral and Organizational Sciences, Department of PsychologyClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations