Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 896–908 | Cite as

Think ahead before you regulate: A focus on future consequences predicts choices of and beliefs about strategies for the down-regulation of negative emotions

  • Catherine N. M. Ortner
  • Leah Chadwick
  • Alexis M. Wilson
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Considering future consequences predicts many self-regulatory behaviors. Moreover, emotion regulation choices often involve trade-offs between immediate hedonic benefits and future well-being and mental health. We propose that focusing on future consequences may also predict emotion regulation choices. We examined whether people who consider future consequences of their actions are more likely to choose adaptive strategies and less likely to choose maladaptive strategies (Study 1) and whether people believe that adaptive and maladaptive strategies have differential short- and long-term consequences (Study 2). In Study 1, consideration of future consequences was related to choosing more adaptive and fewer maladaptive strategies for regulating negative emotions. In Study 2, participants believed that adaptive strategies are more effective in the short-term than in the long-term and that maladaptive strategies are more effective in the long-term than in the short-term. Moreover, commonalities in favored strategies were observed across the two studies. Taken together, the findings suggest that trait future time focus plays a significant role in emotion regulation preferences and that people have some knowledge about the varied temporal consequences of different strategies.

Keywords

Emotion regulation Consideration of future consequences Future time focus Well-being 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [grant number 430-2014-00626]. The authors thank Allister Grapes for his assistance with data collection.

References

  1. Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(3), 263–278.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., & Giammarco, E. A. (2015). Relationships between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 58–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargai, N., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Shalev, A. Y. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in battered women: The mediating role of learned helplessness. Journal of Family Violence, 22(5), 267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9078-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(2), 139–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. a. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 208–211.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902844400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004). The importance of being flexible: The ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychological Science, 15(7), 482–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boninger, D. S., Gleicher, F., & Strathman, A. (1994). Counterfactual thinking: From what might have been to what may be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 297–307.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bostic, T. J., Mcgartland, D., & Hood, M. (2011). A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52(3), 313–324.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007136110218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Ayduk, Ö, & John, O. P. (2016). Taking the long view: Implications of individual differences in temporal distancing for affect, stress reactivity, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger, and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 724–731.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., & Phillips, C. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 17–32.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.1.17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, L. D., & Overall, N. C. (2017). Suppression and expression as distinct emotion-regulation processes in daily interactions: Longitudinal and meta-analyses. Emotion, Online Fir.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chervonsky, E., & Hunt, C. (2017). Suppression and expression of emotion in social and interpersonal outcomes: A meta-analysis. Emotion, 17(4), 669–683.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Clancy, F., Prestwich, A., Caperon, L., & O’Connor, D. B. (2016). Perseverative cognition and health behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 534.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Dassen, F. C. M., Houben, K., & Jansen, A. (2015). Time orientation and eating behavior: Unhealthy eaters consider immediate consequences, while healthy eaters focus on future health. Appetite, 91, 13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of analytical rumination, reappraisal, and distraction on anger experience. Behavior Therapy, 43(2), 355–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.08.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. DeSteno, D., Gross, J. J., & Kubzansky, L. (2013). Affective science and health: The importance of emotion and emotion regulation. Health Psychology, 32(5), 474–486.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 451–462.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105–1117.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Aldao, A., & De Los Reyes, A. (2014). Repertoires of emotion regulation: A person-centered approach to assessing emotion regulation strategies and links to psychopathology. Cognition and Emotion, 29(7), 1314–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.983046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellis, A. J., Vanderlind, W. M., & Beevers, C. G. (2013). Enhanced anger reactivity and reduced distress tolerance in major depressive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 37(3), 498–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9494-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erisman, S. M., & Roemer, L. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the effects of experimentally induced mindfulness on emotional responding to film clips. Emotion, 10(1), 72–82.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017162.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577–586.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (1st edn., pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gutentag, T., Halperin, E., Porat, R., Bigman, Y. E., & Tamir, M. (2016). Successful emotion regulation requires both conviction and skill: Beliefs about the controllability of emotions, reappraisal, and regulation success. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1225–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1213704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, C. M., Ritchie, T. D., Hepper, E. G., & Gebauer, J. E. (2015). The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16). SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heiy, J. E., & Cheavens, J. S. (2014). Back to basics: A naturalistic assessment of the experience and regulation of emotion. Emotion, 14(5), 878–891.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Huta, V. (2012). Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: Parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 47–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9249-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joireman, J., Anderson, J., & Strathman, A. (2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1287–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(5), 313–326.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Joireman, J., Strathman, A., & Balliet, D. (2006). Considering future consequences. In L. Sanna & E. Chang (Eds.), Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (pp. 88–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kalisch, R. (2009). The functional neuroanatomy of reappraisal: Time matters. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(8), 1215–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kross, E., & Ayduk, O. (2008). Facilitating adaptive emotional analysis: Distinguishing distanced-analysis of depressive experiences from immersed-analysis and distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 924–938.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208315938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lepore, S. J. (1997). Expressive writing moderates the relation between intrusive thoughts and depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 1030–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lepore, S. J., Ragan, J. D., & Jones, S. (2000). Talking facilitates cognitive-emotional processes of adaptation to an acute stressor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 499–508.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Marjanovic, Z., Holden, R., Struthers, W., Cribbie, R., & Greenglass, E. (2015). The inter-item standard deviation (ISD): An index that discriminates between conscientious and random responders. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 79–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marjanovic, Z., Struthers, C. W., Cribbie, R., & Greenglass, E. R. (2014). The Conscientious Responders Scale: A new tool for discriminating between conscientious and random responders. SAGE Open, 4(3), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014545964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McKay, M. T., Cole, J. C., & Percy, A. (2015). Further evidence for a bifactor solution for the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Measurement and conceptual implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 219–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKay, M. T., Percy, A., & Cole, J. C. (2013). Consideration of future consequences and alcohol use among Northern Irish adolescents. Journal of Substance Use, 18(5), 377–391.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14659891.2012.685793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A Model of Future-Oriented Motivation, 16(1), 9–33.Google Scholar
  51. Naragon-Gainey, K., McMahon, T. P., & Chacko, T. P. (2017). The structure of common emotion regulation strategies: A meta-analytic examination. Psychological Bulletin, 143(4), 384–427.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000093.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelis, D., Kotsou, I., Quoidbach, J., Hansenne, M., Weytens, F., Dupuis, P., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Increasing emotional competence improves psychological and physical well-being, social relationships, and employability. Emotion, 11(2), 354–366.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nelis, D., Quoidbach, J., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Measuring individual differences in emotion regulation: The Emotion Regulation Profile-Revised (ERP-R). Psychologica Belgica, 51(1), 49–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ortner, C. N. M., Zelazo, P. D., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Effects of emotion regulation on concurrent attentional performance. Motivation and Emotion, 37(2), 346–354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9310-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pedersen, W. C., Denson, T. F., Goss, R. J., Vasquez, E. A., Kelley, N. J., & Miller, N. (2011). The impact of rumination on aggressive thoughts, feelings, arousal, and behaviour. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 281–301.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X515696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Peters, B. R., Joireman, J., & Ridgway, R. L. (2005). Individual differences in the consideration of future consequences scale correlate with sleep habits, sleep quality, and GPA in university students. Psychological Reports, 96, 817–824.  https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.96.3.817-824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Philippot, P. (2013). Emotion regulation: A heuristic paradigm for psychopathology. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 45(5), 600–607.  https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.034513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 368–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Quoidbach, J., Wood, A. M., & Hansenne, M. (2009). Back to the future: the effect of daily practice of mental time travel into the future on happiness and anxiety. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(5), 349–355.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902992365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ray, R. D., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J. (2008). All in the mind’s eye? Anger rumination and reappraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Composure at any cost? The cognitive consequences of emotion suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 1033–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schäfer, J., Naumann, E., Holmes, E. A., Tuschen-Caffier, B., & Samson, A. C. (2017). Emotion regulation strategies in depressive and anxiety symptoms in youth: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 261–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0585-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schutte, N. S., Manes, R. R., & Malouff, J. M. (2009). Antecedent-focused emotion regulation, response modulation and well-being. Current Psychology, 28(1), 21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9044-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Is timing everything? Temporal considerations in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 319–331.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310395778.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2007). Better late than never? On the dynamics of online regulation of sadness using distraction and cognitive reappraisal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(11), 1518–1532.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207305537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sheppes, G., Scheibe, S., Suri, G., & Gross, J. J. (2011). Emotion-regulation choice. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1391–1396.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sheppes, G., Scheibe, S., Suri, G., Radu, P., Blechert, J., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation choice: A conceptual framework and supporting evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 163–181.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Single, E., Rehm, J., Robson, L., & Truong, M. V. (2000). The relative risks and etiologic fractions of different causes of death and disease attributable to alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use in Canada. CMAJ, 162(12), 1669–1675.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2016). Time perspectives predict mood states and satisfaction with life over and above personality. Current Psychology, 35(4), 516–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9515-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tabachnick, S. E., Miller, R. B., & Relyea, G. E. (2008). The relationships among students’ future-oriented goals and subgoals, perceived task instrumentality, and task-oriented self-regulation strategies in an academic environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 629–642.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thiruchselvam, R., Blechert, J., Sheppes, G., Rydstrom, A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: An EEG study of distraction and reappraisal. Biological Psychology, 87(1), 84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. van Beek, J., Antonides, G., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2013). Eat now, exercise later: The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 785–791.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThompson Rivers UniversityKamloopsCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options