Memory performance in older adults: Experimental evidence for the indirect effect of memory self-efficacy on processing efficiency through worry
- 149 Downloads
This research examined the mediating role of worry in the relationship between memory self-efficacy (MSE) and processing efficiency during episodic memory performance in older adults. We conducted an experimental study in which we manipulated older adults’ MSE using a false feedback paradigm. The memory task was adapted to provide an indicator of performance effectiveness (recall score) and an indicator of processing efficiency (ratio of recall score to number of encoding trials needed). We measured participants’ worry and emotionality before task completion. The causal impact of MSE condition (high vs. low MSE) on processing efficiency was significantly mediated through worry, with lower MSE leading to increased worry, which predicted impaired processing efficiency. This study provides the first experimental evidence for the mediating effect of worry on the causal impact of MSE on processing efficiency in older adults when they perform challenging memory tasks. We discuss implications for the clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment and for age-related disengagement from everyday cognitive activities.
KeywordsMemory self-efficacy Performance effectiveness Processing efficiency Anxiety Worry Aging
I would like to thank Elodie Falque, Adeline Guegan, and Lucile Letscher for their assistance with participants recruitment and data collection.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures involving human participants were carried out in accordance with the Institution’s and/or National Research Committee’s ethical standards, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and subsequent amendments, or with comparable ethical standards.
- Bandura, A. (2003). Auto-efficacité: Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle [Self-efficacy: The sense of personal efficacy]. Bruxelles: De Boeck Diffusion.Google Scholar
- Beaudoin, M., & Desrichard, O. (2009). Validation of a short french state test worry and emotionality scale. International Review of Social Psychology, 22, 79–104.Google Scholar
- Berry, J. M., Hastings, E. C., West, R. L., Courtney, L., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (2010). Memory aging: Deficits, beliefs, and interventions. In J. C. Cavanaugh, C. K. Cavanaugh, J. M. Berry & R. L. West (Eds.), Aging in America. Psychological aspects (Vol. 1, pp. 255–299). Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- Bouazzaoui, B., Isingrini, M., Fay, S., Angel, L., Vanneste, S., Clarys, D., & Taconnat, L. (2010). Aging and self-reported internal and external memory strategy uses: The role of executive functioning. Acta Psychologica, 135, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elfgren, C., Gustafson, L., Vestberg, S., & Passant, U. (2010). Subjective memory complaints, neuropsychological performance and psychiatric variables in memory clinic attendees: A 3-year follow-up study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 51, 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Endler, N. S., Edwards, J. M., & Vitelli, R. (1991). Endler multidimensional anxiety scales (EMAS): Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Howell, D. C. (1998). Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines [Statistical methods in the social sciences]. Paris: De Boeck Université.Google Scholar
- Lachman, M. E., Neupert, S. D., & Agrigoroaei, S. (2011). The relevance of control beliefs for health and aging. In K. W. Schaie & S. L. Willis (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed.). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Sindi, S., Fiocco, A. J., Juster, R.-P., Pruessner, J., & Lupien, S. J. (2013). When we test, do we stress? Impact of the testing environment on cortisol secretion and memory performance in older adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1388–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Valentijn, S. A. M., Hill, R. D., Van Hooren, S. A. H., Bosma, H., Van Boxtel, M. P. J., Jolles, J., & Ponds, R. (2006). Memory self-efficacy predicts memory performance: Results from a 6-year follow-up study. Psychology and Aging, 21, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7918.104.22.168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vanier, M., & Lemyze, C. (1994). Rivermead behavioral memory test (2nd ed.). [Measurement instrument]. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form. University of Iowa, Department of Psychology Publication.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2001). MEM-III: Manuel de l’Echelle Clinique de Mémoire (3 ed.) [WMS-III: Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.)]. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
- Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar