Science fiction and human enhancement: radical life-extension in the movie ‘In Time’ (2011)
The ethics of human enhancement has been a hotly debated topic in the last 15 years. In this debate, some advocate examining science fiction stories to elucidate the ethical issues regarding the current phenomenon of human enhancement. Stories from science fiction seem well suited to analyze biomedical advances, providing some possible case studies. Of particular interest is the work of screenwriter Andrew Niccol (Gattaca, S1m0ne, In Time, and Good Kill), which often focuses on ethical questions raised by the use of new technologies. Examining the movie In Time (2011), the aim of this paper is to show how science fiction can contribute to the ethical debate of human enhancement. In Time provides an interesting case study to explore what could be some of the consequences of radical life-extension technologies. In this paper, we will show how arguments regarding radical life-extension portrayed in this particular movie differ from what is found in the scientific literature. We will see how In Time gives flesh to arguments defending or rejecting radical life-extension. It articulates feelings of unease, alienation and boredom associated with this possibility. Finally, this article will conclude that science fiction movies in general, and In Time in particular, are a valuable resource for a broad and comprehensive debate about our coming future.
KeywordsHuman enhancement Life-extending therapy Immortality Ethics Aging
Funding was provided by Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Grant No. 165222).
- Annas, George J, Lori B Andrews, and Rosario M Isasi. 2002. Protecting the Endangered Human: Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterations. American Journal of Law and Medicine 28 (2–3): 151–178.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, Allen, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler. 2001. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Childress, James F., and Tom L. Beauchamp. 2008. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Sixth edit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- De Grey, Aubrey, and Michael Rae. 2008. Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs That Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
- Eichinger, Tobias. 2011. Wer hat Angst vor Androiden? Aufklärungsmaschinen und bewegte Menschenbilder im Roboterfilm. In Das Gehirn als Projekt: Wissenschaftler, Künstler und Schüler erkunden unsere neurotechnische Zukunft, eds. Müller O, Maio G, Boldt J, et al., Rombach, 210–216.Google Scholar
- Eichinger, Tobias. 2013. Jenseits der Therapie. Philosophie und Ethik wunscherfüllender Medizin. Transcript.Google Scholar
- Elliott, Carl. 2004. Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, Francis. 2003. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
- Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Harris, John. 2008. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Huxley, Aldous. 1932/2006. Brave New World, Reprint ed. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
- Juengst, Eric and Moseley, Daniel. 2016. Human Enhancement, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/enhancement/.
- Kass, Leon. 2003. Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. In The New Atlantis, 9–28.Google Scholar
- McKibben, Bill. 2004. Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
- Niccol, Andrew. 2011. In Time. USA: 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
- Sandel, Michael J. 2007. The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Shapshay, Sandra. 2009. Bioethics at the Movies, ed. by Sandra Shapshay. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar