Narrative methods for assessing “quality of life” in hand transplantation: five case studies with bioethical commentary
Despite having paved the way for face, womb and penis transplants, hand transplantation today remains a small hybrid of reconstructive microsurgery and transplant immunology. An exceptionally limited patient population internationally (N < 200) complicates medical researchers’ efforts to parse outcomes “objectively.” Presumed functional and psychosocial benefits of gaining a transplant hand must be weighed in both patient decisions and bioethical discussions against the difficulty of adhering to post-transplant medications, the physical demands of hand transplant recovery on the patient, and the serious long-term health risks of immunosuppressant drugs. This paper relates five narratives of hand transplantation drawn from an oral history project to show how narrative methods can and should inform ethical evaluations and the clinical process of hand transplantation. The interviews with patients and their partners analyzed here lead us to suggest that qualitative accounts of patient experiences should be used to complement clinical case studies reported in medical journals and to help develop instruments to assess outcomes more systematically.
KeywordsReconstructive surgery Hand transplantation Vascularized composite allotransplantation Person-centered medicine Disability Research ethics Caregiver burden Qualitative methods Informed consent
This study was funded by Department of Communication, University of Pittsburgh (US).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal [IRB] consent is not required.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article. “Deed of Gift” forms for all narrators are on file with the first author.
- Alexander, C. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bachmann, D. 2007. Quality of life in hand transplant patients. In Hand Transplantation, eds. Marco Lanzetta and Jean-Michel Dubernard, 363–369. Springer.Google Scholar
- Bornat, J., and R. Perks. 2014. Oral History, Health, and Welfare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Charon, R. 2001. Narrative medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine 135 (10): 930. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-10-200111200-00022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Charon, R. 2016. Clinical contributions of narrative medicine. Oxford Medicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199360192.003.0014.Google Scholar
- Constant, N., and L. Roberts. 2017. Narratives as a mode of research evaluation in citizen science: understanding broader science communication impacts. Journal of Science Communication A03: 1–18.Google Scholar
- Corbin, J. M., and A. L. Strauss. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Coulehan, J. 2003. Metaphor and medicine: narrative in clinical practice. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 76 (2), 87–95.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M., and A. Sheridan. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
- Health Quality, Ontario. 2016. Composite tissue transplant of hand or arm: a health technology assessment. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series [Internet]. (13):1–70. http://www.hqontario.ca/Evidence-to-Improve-Care/Journal-Ontario-Health-Technology-Assessment-Series/hand-arm-transplant.
- Hurwitz, B., and V. Bates. 2018. The roots and ramifications of narrative in modern medicine. In The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities, eds Sarah Atkinson, Jane Macnaughton, Jennifer Richards, Anne Whitehead, and Angela Woods. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474400046.003.0032.Google Scholar
- Jensen, S. E., Z. Butt, A. Bill, T. Baker, M. M. Abecassis, A. W. Heinemann, D. Cella, and G. A. Dumanian. 2012. Quality of life considerations in upper limb transplantation: Review and Future Directions. The Journal of Hand Surgery 37 (10): 2126–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kleinman, A. 1988. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Neukom, M., V. Corti, B. Boothe, A. Boehler, and L. Goetzmann. 2012. Fantasized recipient–donor relationships following lung transplantations: a qualitative case analysis based on patient narratives. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93 (1): 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00496.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ross, H., S. Abbey, E. D. Luca, O. Mauthner, P. Mckeever, M. Shildrick, and J. Poole. 2010. What they say versus what we see: “Hidden” distress and impaired quality of life in heart transplant recipients. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 29 (10): 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simmons, P. D. 2000. Ethical considerations in composite tissue allotransplantation. Microsurgery 20 (8): 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2752(2000)20:83.0.co;2-g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tobin, G., W. Breidenbach, M. Klapheke, F. Bentley, D. Pidwell, and P. Simmons. 2005. Ethical considerations in the early composite tissue allograft experience: a review of the Louisville ethics program. Transplantation Proceedings 37 (2): 1392–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yow, V. R. 2015. Recording oral history: A guide for the humanities and social sciences. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Webster, L., and P. Mertova. 2008. Using narrative inquiry as a research method: an introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar