Advertisement

Measurement Techniques

, Volume 61, Issue 12, pp 1238–1243 | Cite as

The Concept of a New Generation of Electrocardiogram Simulators

  • A. A. FedotovEmail author
MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS
  • 10 Downloads

The article is devoted to the issues of conceptual development of a new generation of electrocardiogram imitators. A mathematical model is proposed for simulating ECG signal considering the variability of biosignal morphology, the presence of various distortions and artefacts, heart rate variability and respiratory modulation of ECG signal. A block diagram of the ECG simulator was designed.

Keywords

electrocardiogram biosignals imitator mathematical model metrological verification 

References

  1. 1.
    R. M. Rangayyan, Biomedical Signal Analysis. Practical Approach [Russian translation], FIZMATLIT, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Fedotov and S. A. Akulov, Mathematical Modeling and Error Analysis of Measuring Transducers of Biomedical Signals, FIZMATLIT, Moscow (2013).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R 50.2.009–2011, State System for Ensuring Uniformity of Measurements. Electrocardiographs, Electrocardioscopes and Electrocardioanalyzers. Verification Methodology, Rostekhregulirovanie, Moscow (2011).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    GOST 19687–94, Devices for Measuring the Bioelectric Potentials of the Heart. General Technical Requirements and Test Methods.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. E. McSharry, P. E. McSharry, G. D. Clifford, et al., “A dynamical model for generating synthetic electrocardiogram signals,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 50, No. 3, 289–295 (2003), DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2003.808805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    “Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability,” Circulation, 93, 1043–1065 (1996).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    PhysioNet. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Database, http://physionet.org, acc. May 20, 2018.
  8. 8.
    J. Boyle, N. Bidargaddi, A. Sarela, and M. Karunanithi, “Automatic detection of respiration rate from ambulatory single-lead ECG,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed., 16, No. 6, 890–896 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. M. Friesen, G. M. Friesen, T. C. Jannett, et al., “A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 27, No. 1, 85–98 (1990), DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1109/10.43620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Dev, “Different techniques to remove baseline wander from ECG signal: a review,” Int. J. Electr., Electron. Comm. Eng., 2, No. 7, 532–537 (2012).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Han, “Development of real-time motion artifact reduction algorithm for a wearable photoplethysmography,” Proc. 29th Ann. Int. Conf. of the IEEE EMBS (2007), pp. 1539–1541, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352596.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Samara National Research UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations