Conscience-based refusal of patient care in medicine: a consequentialist analysis
- 70 Downloads
Conscience-based refusals by health care professionals to provide care to eligible patients are problematic, given the monopoly such professionals hold on the provision of such services. This article reviews standard ethical arguments in support of conscientious refuser accommodation and finds them wanting. It discusses proposed compromise solutions involving efforts aimed at testing the genuineness and reasonability of refusals and rejects those solutions too. A number of jurisdictions have introduced policies requiring conscientious refusers to provide effective referrals. These policies have turned out to be unworkable. They subject patients to a health care delivery lottery, which is incompatible with the fundamental values of medical professionalism. This paper sheds light on transnational efforts aimed at undermining progress made in reproductive health by means of conscientious refusal accommodation claims. The view that the accommodation of conscientious refusers is indefensible on consequentialist ethical grounds, as well as on grounds related to medical professionalism itself, is defended.
KeywordsConscientious objection Medical professionalism Reproductive health Euthanasia Conscientious refusal
I thank Jason T. Eberl and Ricardo D. Smalling as well as an anonymous reviewer chosen by this journal for their detailed, constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper. Their valiant critical efforts triggered numerous changes to the manuscript. A very special thank you is due to this journal’s Managing Editor at the time of writing, Katelyn MacDougald, a doctoral student in Georgetown University’s Department of Linguistics—a genius copy editor if there ever was one, and here’s hoping that she doesn’t have to correct this line. All remaining errors are my own.
- 1.Truong, Michelle, and Susan Y. Wood. 2018. Unconscionable: When providers deny abortion care. New York: International Women’s Health Coalition.Google Scholar
- 2.NeJaime, Douglas, and Reva B. Siegel. 2015. Conscience wars: Complicity-based conscience claims in religion and politics. Yale Law Journal 124: 2516–2591.Google Scholar
- 3.Mississippi Health Care Right of Conscience Act, Miss. Code Ann. § 41-107-1 to 13 (2005).Google Scholar
- 4.NeJaime, Douglas, and Reva Siegel. 2018. Conscience wars in transnational perspective: Religious liberty, third-party harm, and pluralism. In The conscience wars: Rethinking the balance between religion, identity, and equality, ed. Susanna Mancini and Michel Rosenfeld, 187–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kirkey, Sharon. 2018. New family doctors “don’t feel competent” to perform abortions due to lack of training: Study. National Post, June 20. http://nationalpost.com/wcm/38b00c8e-1037-4174-b8d9-406b739db169.
- 12.United Nations Human Rights Committee. 1993. General comment No. 22, Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 48th Sess., U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/48/CRP.2/Rev.1 (July 30, 1993). https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fb22.html.
- 13.Brock, Peter. 1972. Pacifism in Europe to 1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 14.World Medical Association. 2017. WMA Declaration of Geneva. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva.
- 15.Kelly, Grant. 2017. Canadian doctors turn away from assisted dying over fees. Globe and Mail, July 3. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/payment-complications-turning-canadian-doctors-away-from-assisted-dying/article35538666.
- 18.Braun, Hannelore. 2000. Hermann Stöhr (1898–1940). In Zeugen einer besseren Welt: Christliche Märtyrer des 20. Jahrhunderts, ed. Karl-Joseph Hummel and Christoph Strohm, 87–105. Leipzig: Butzon and Bercker.Google Scholar
- 24.Freidson, Eliot. 1989. Theory and the professions. Indiana Law Journal 64: 423–432.Google Scholar
- 25.Caruk, Holly, and Bryce Hoye. 2017. Waiting to die: Winnipeg man says faith-based hospital delayed access to assisted death. CBC News, October 26. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/misericordia-assisted-dying-maid-1.4371796.
- 26.Lucero, Louis, II. 2018. Walgreens pharmacist denies woman with unviable pregnancy the medication needed to end it. New York Times, June 25. https://nyti.ms/2MY1zMv.
- 27.Porter, Tom. 2018. Walgreens pharmacy refuses to give woman pregnancy termination drugs prescribed by her doctor. Newsweek, June 24. http://www.newsweek.com/woman-refused-pregnancy-termination-drugs-walgreens-pharmacy-992994.
- 34.Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).Google Scholar
- 36.Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2018 ONSC 579.Google Scholar
- 37.Fiala, Christian, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Oskari Heikinheimo, Jans A. Guðmundsson, and Joyce Arthur. 2016. Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 21: 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Gavaghan, Colin. 2017. Commentary on Hallagan v Medical Council of New Zealand: Whose choice, whose conscience? In Feminist judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand—Te Rino: A two-stranded rope, ed. Elisabeth McDonald, Rhonda Powell, Māmari Stephens, and Rosemary Hunter, 143–150. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
- 39.Baumgartner, Fritz. 2017. Has modern bioethics become a menace to ethical medicine? Celebrate Life Magazine. https://www.clmagazine.org/topic/medicine-science/has-modern-bioethics-become-a-menace-to-ethical-medicine. Accessed 27 June 2018.