Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 123–139 | Cite as

Is “aid in dying” suicide?

  • Philip ReedEmail author


The practice whereby terminally ill patients choose to end their own lives painlessly by ingesting a drug prescribed by a physician has commonly been referred to as physician-assisted suicide. There is, however, a strong trend forming that seeks to deny that this act should properly be termed suicide. The purpose of this paper is to examine and reject the view that the term suicide should be abandoned in reference to what has been called physician-assisted suicide. I argue that there are no good conceptual or philosophical reasons to avoid the suicide label. I contend that intending one’s death is essential to the nature of suicide, and this intention is normally required on the part of the terminally ill patient when she knowingly takes a life-ending drug. Additionally, the analysis shows that any plausible strategy that avoids the term suicide is counteracted by the way in which advocates of the practice want to make it legal.


Suicide Physician-assisted suicide Coercion Intention 



I presented an earlier version of this paper at The Romanell Center for Clinical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine Conference, University at Buffalo, July 2016; the Catholic University of America, February 2017; and the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, October 2018. I’m grateful to the audiences on those occasions for helpful feedback, especially to David Hershenov, Stephen Kershnar, Neil Feit, Jim Delaney, Travis Timmerman, and Eric Mathison. I also thank several anonymous referees for their instructive comments on previous drafts.


  1. 1.
    Caplan, Arthur L. 2015. The case for assisted dying. Chicago Tribune, September 16.
  2. 2.
    Angell, Marcia. 2013. How to die in Massachusetts. New York Review of Books, February 21.
  3. 3.
    Battin, Margaret Pabst. 2015. Death with dignity: Is it suicide? OUPBlog, Oxford University Press. November 7, 2015.
  4. 4.
    Battin, Margaret P. 2016. Goodbye, Thomas: The case for physician assisted dying. In The Oxford handbook of ethics at the end of life, ed. Stuart J. Youngner and Robert M. Arnold, 383–388. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orentlicher, David, Thaddeus M. Pope, and Ben A. Rich. 2016. Clinical criteria for physician aid in dying. Journal of Palliative Medicine 19: 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quill, Timothy E., and Jane Greenlaw. 2008. Physician-assisted death. In From birth to death and bench to clinic: The Hastings Center bioethics briefing book for journalists, policymakers, and campaigns, ed. Mary Crowley, 137–142. Garrison, NY: Hastings Center.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Association of Suicidology. 2017. Statement of the American Association of Suicidology: “Suicide” is not the same as “physician aid in dying.” Accessed February 2, 2019.
  8. 8.
    Dworkin, Gerald. 2015. California dying. 3 Quarks Daily (blog). June 1, 2015.
  9. 9.
    Kupfer, Joseph. 1990. Suicide: Its nature and moral evaluation. Journal of Value Inquiry 24: 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hill, Daniel K. 2011. What is it to commit suicide? Ratio 24: 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margolis, Joseph. 1975. Negativities: The limits of life. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torisky, Eugene V. 2015. Minimally intentional suicide and “The Falling Man.” Journal of Value Inquiry 49: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wreen, Michael. 1998. The definition of suicide. Social Theory and Practice 14: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Keeffe, Terence M. 1984. Suicide and self-starvation. Philosophy 59: 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gunderson, Martin, and David J. Mayo. 2000. Restricting physician-assisted death to the terminally ill. Hastings Center Report 30(6): 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gill, Michael B. 2005. A moral defense of Oregon’s physician-assisted suicide law. Mortality 10: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luper, Steven. 2009. The philosophy of death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paterson, Craig. 2003. On clarifying terms in applied ethics discourse: Suicide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia. International Philosophy Quarterly 43: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tolhurst, William E. 1983. Suicide, self-sacrifice and coercion. Southern Journal of Philosophy 21: 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frey, R.G. 1978. Did Socrates commit suicide? Philosophy 53: 106–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cholbi, Michael. 2011. Suicide: The philosophical dimensions. Buffalo: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graber, Glenn C. 1998. Mastering the concept of suicide. In Suicide: Right or wrong?, 2nd ed, ed. John Donnelly, 150–161. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fairbairn, Gavin J. 1995. Contemplating suicide: The language and ethics of self-harm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shneidman, Edwin. 1985. Definition of suicide. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rosenberg, Mark L., Lucy E. Davidson, Jack C. Smith, Alan L. Berman, Herb Buzbee, George Gantner, George A. Gay, et al. 1988. Operational criteria for the determination of suicide. Journal of Forensic Science 33: 1445–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maris, Ronald W., Alan L. Berman, and Morton M. Silverman (eds.). 2000. Comprehensive textbook of suicidology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Posner, Kelly, Beth Brodsky, Kseniya Yershova, Jacqueline Buchanan, and John Mann. 2014. The classification of suicidal behavior. In The Oxford handbook of suicide and self-injury, ed. Matthew K. Nock, 7–22. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suicide. 1994. In American heritage dictionary of the English language, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  29. 29.
    Suicide. 2008. In Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary, 11th ed. Springfield: Merriam-Webster.
  30. 30.
    Frey, Rebecca J., Emily Jane Willingham, and David A. Brent. 2011. Suicide. In The Gale encyclopedia of medicine, vol. 5, 4th ed, ed. Laurie J. Fundukian, 4203–4210. Detroit: Gale.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Windt, Peter Y. 1980. The concept of suicide. In Suicide: The philosophical issues, ed. M. Pabst Battin and David J. Mayo, 39–47. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alvarez, Maria. 2009. Actions, thought-experiments and the “Principle of Alternate Possibilities.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87: 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Steward, Helen. 2009. Fairness, agency and the flicker of freedom. Noûs 43: 64–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dugan, Andrew. 2015. In U.S., support up for doctor-assisted suicide. Gallup News, May 27.
  35. 35.
    Magelssen, Morten, Magne Supphellen, Per Nortvedt, and Lars Johan Materstvedt. 2006. Attitudes towards assisted dying are influenced by question wording and order: A survey experiment. BMC Medical Ethics 17: 24. Scholar
  36. 36.
    Feltz, Adam. 2015. Everyday attitudes about euthanasia and the slippery slope argument. In New directions in the ethics of assisted suicide and euthanasia, ed. Michael Cholbi and Jukka Varelius, 217–237. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Newport, Frank. 2015. Americans continue to shift left on key moral issues. Gallup News, May 26.
  38. 38.
    Angell, Marcia. 2012. May doctors help you to die? New York Review of Books, October 11.
  39. 39.
    Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The sanctity of life. In Philosophy and the human condition, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp, William Blackstone, and Joel Feinberg, 250–265. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Beauchamp, Tom L. 1980. Suicide. In Matters of life and death, ed. Tom Regan, 67–108. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stern-Gillet, Suzanne. 1987. The rhetoric of suicide. Philosophy and Rhetoric 20: 160–170.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wall, Edmund. 1988. Intention and coercion. Journal of Applied Philosophy 5: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nozick, Robert. 1969. Coercion. In Philosophy, science, and method: Essays in honor of Ernest Nagel, ed. Sidney Morgenbesser, Patrick Suppes, and Morton White, 440–472. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cholbi, Michael. 2017. Suicide. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2017 ed, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  46. 46.
    Anderson, Scott. 2008. Of theories of coercion, two axes, and the importance of the coercer. Journal of Moral Philosophy 5: 394–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fowler, Mark. 1982. Coercion and practical reason. Social Theory Practice 8: 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    California End of Life Option Act. 2016. California Health and Safety Code § 443 et seq.
  49. 49.
    Reed, Philip A. 2013. Artifacts, intentions, and contraceptives: The problem with having a plan B for Plan B. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38: 657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anscombe, G.E.M. 1961. War and murder. In Nuclear weapons and Christian conscience, ed. Walter Stein, 45–62. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Davis, Wayne A. 1984. A causal theory of intending. American Philosophical Quarterly 21: 43–54.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Masek, Lawrence. 2010. Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect. Philosophical Quarterly 60: 567–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nelkin, Dana Kay, and Samuel C. Rickless. 2014. Three cheers for double effect. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89: 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wedgwood, Ralph. 2011. Defending double effect. Ratio 24: 386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Callahan, Daniel. 2008. Organized obfuscation: Advocacy for physician-assisted suicide. Hastings Center Report 38(5): 30–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canisius CollegeBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations