Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 387–391 | Cite as

Causality in medicine, and its relation to action, mechanisms, and probability

Donald Gillies: Causality, probability, and medicine. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018, 300pp, £29.99 E-Book
  • Daniel Auker-HowlettEmail author
  • Michael Wilde
Book Review

Medical researchers want to find out the causes of disease, and they want to find out what works to prevent or cure those diseases. A good deal of recent work in the philosophy of medicine has therefore been concerned with the issue of working out exactly what sort of evidence is required to establish a causal hypothesis in medicine (Russo and Williamson 2007; Howick 2011; Parkkinen et al. 2018; Clarke et al. 2014). One way to make progress on this epistemological issue is to first work out the correct metaphysical theory of causality for medicine. In this book, Donald Gillies supports a particular theory of generic causality for theoretical medicine by testing it against detailed historical case studies in medicine. He then investigates the implications of such a theory for the epistemology of medicine.

The book comes in three parts. In the first part, Gillies proposes a version of a so-called action-relatedtheory of deterministic causality, where an action-related theory stresses...

Notes

References

  1. Broadbent, Alex. 2011. Inferring causation in epidemiology: Mechanisms, black boxes, and contrasts. In Causality in the sciences, ed. Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo and Jon Williamson, 45–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, Brendan, Donald Gillies, Phyllis Illari, Federica Russo, and Jon Williamson. 2014. Mechanisms and the evidence hierarchy. Topoi 33: 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gasking, Douglas. 1955. Causation and recipes. Mind 64: 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hesslow, Germund. 1976. Two notes on the probabilistic approach to causality. Philosophy of Science 43: 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Howick, Jeremy. 2011. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Illari, Phyllis. 2011. Disambiguating the Russo-Williamson thesis. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25: 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Menzies, Peter, and Huw Price. 1993. Causation as a secondary quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parkkinen, Veli-Pekka, et al. 2018. Evaluating evidence of mechanisms in medicine: Principles and procedures. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Russo, Federica, and Jon Williamson. 2007. Interpreting causality in the health science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilde, Michael, and Veli-Pekka Parkkinen. 2017. Extrapolation and the Russo-Williamson thesis. Synthese. Google Scholar
  12. Williamson, Jon. 2009. Probabilistic theories. In The Oxford handbook of causation, ed. Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock and Peter Menzies, 185–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Woodward, James. 2003. Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations