Advertisement

Metallurgist

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Austenitic Structure Evolution During Pipe Steel Coiled Rolled Product Manufacture in Casting and Rolling Complexes of Different Configurations

  • A. V. MuntinEmail author
  • A. V. Chastukhin
  • D. A. Ringinen
  • L. I. Éfron
Article

Different layouts of casting-rolling complexes are analyzed from the point of view of producing cold-resistant pipe steel grades X60–X70. Based on calculations for a recrystallization model it is possible to establish the effect of rolling equipment configuration and main process temperature and time parameters on austenitic structure quantitative characteristics. Using the criteria proposed possibilities are demonstrated for optimizing the process with different equipment layouts.

Keywords

casting and rolling complex hot-rolled strip pipe steel grades recrystallization 

References

  1. 1.
    A. V. Muntin, “Advanced technology of combined thin slab continuous casting and hot strip rolling,” Metallurg., No. 9, 43–51 (2018).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Kemken, G. Klyainshmidt, Ya. Bader, et al., “Mini plant with complete cycle: short path from iron ore to thin hot-rolled strip,” Metall. Proizvod. Tekhnol., No. 2, 8–13 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Shatalov and A. A. Genkin, “Control of sheet rolling production complex providing minimum energy expenditure,” Metallurg., No. 9, 31–34 (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Shatalov and A. Genkin, “Sheet mill control in steel strip hot rolling,” J. Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 59, No. 6, 624–628 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. I. Éfron, Materials Science in Large Metallurgy. Pipe Steels [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, Moscow (2012).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. V. Muntin, Development of Thin Sheet Rolling Technology with Prescribed Properties from Pipe Steel Grades in a 5000 Mill [in Russian], Diss. Cand. Techn. Sci., Moscow (2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. V. Muntin, A. V. Chastukhin, A. V. Chervonnyi, et al., “Development of coiled rolled sheet production technology of strength class K60 manufactured under casting and rolling complex conditions,” Probl. Chern. Met. Materialoved., No. 3, 17–25 (2016).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. D. Zheleznov, G. G. Grigoryan, R. A. Shatalov, et al., “Improvement of steel strip mechanical properties with inaccurate hot rolling,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn., Zaved., Chern. Met., No. 7, 64–68 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Shatalov, T. Koinov, and A. Gurov, “Procedure for evaluating changes in microstructure during hot working in a laminator,” Metallurgiya, No. 4, 1-4 (1985).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Naumenko, A. V. Muntin, A. V. Chervonnyi, and L. I. Éfron, “Effect of microalloying on the microstructure and level of mechanical properties of coiled rolled sheet of strength class K60 produced under CRC conditions,” Stal’, No. 7, 50–56 (2015).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Chervonnyi, V. V. Naumenko, A. V. Muntin, et al., “Microalloying cold-rolled pipe steels for producing coiled rolled product in a casting and rolling complex,” Stal’, No. 9, 56–61 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. V. Chervonnyi, V. V. Naumenko, A. V. Muntin, et al., “Development of a microalloying system for producing cold-resistant coiled rolled product for pipe purposes under CRC conditions,” Metallurg., No. 10, 38-44 (2016).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. A. Soldatov, A. V. Muntin, Chervonnyi, and L. I. Éfron, “Development and assimilation of manufacturing technology for cold resistant rolled product for electrically welded pipes under casting and rolling complex conditions,” in: Proc. VIII All-Russia Conf. of Young Scientists and Specialists “Future Russian Engineering” (2015), pp. 352–357.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Muntin, Yu. M. Kurenkov, and A. G. Kolesnikov, “Contemporary production solutions and equipment for producing ultrathin hot-rolled strip,” Proizvod. Prokata., No. 8, 13–21 (2016).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Chervonnyi, D. A. Ringinen, A. V. Chastukhin, et al., “Structure formation and properties of coiled rolled product for pipe purposes under casting and rolling complex conditions,” Metallurg., No. 10, 40–47 (2018).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Carboni, A. Muntin, A. Polo, et al., “Pushing the limits of the thin slab casting and rolling process for pipe grades,” in: Int. Symp. on Thin Slab Casting and Direct Rolling (Wuhan, China) (2018), pp. 142–150.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. V. Chastukhin, D. A. Ringinen, G. E. Khadeev, and L. I. Éfron, “Kinetics of pipe steel austenite static recrystallization microalloyed with niobium,” Metallurg., No. 12, 33–38 (2015).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Donnay, J. C. Herman, V. Leroy, et al., “Microstructure evolution of C–Mn steels in the hot-deformation process,” in: Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Modelling of Metal Rolling Processes (London, UK) (1996), pp. 23–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Muntin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. V. Chastukhin
    • 1
  • D. A. Ringinen
    • 1
  • L. I. Éfron
    • 1
  1. 1.AO Vyksa Metallurgical PlantVyksaRussia
  2. 2.FGBOU VO N. É. Bauman Moscow State Technical University (National Research University)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations