Advertisement

Meccanica

pp 1–17 | Cite as

Introducing the theory of successful settling in order to evaluate and optimize the sedimentation tanks

  • Saeid Vahidifar
  • Mohammad Reza Saffarian
  • Ebrahim Hajidavalloo
Article

Abstract

A rectangular settling tank in full scale is investigated using the Fluent software to increase its efficiency. First, the pure water is simulated in the absence of particles. Then particles are injected into the flow field and tracked by means of the discrete phase model. Three methods are presented to optimize the settling tank: (1) adding a baffle which is mounted in the bottom and is extended up to the near of free surface, (2) adding a baffle which is mounted in the free surface and is extended up to the near of the tank bottom and (3) install a bi-directional baffle which is mounted in the free surface and is extended up to the near of the bottom. These three suggestions are checked using the short-circuiting phenomenon and the successful settling theory. The successful settling theory states that a particle can be accounted as a “trapped” particle if (1) settled particle stays static and stable in the tank bottom and (2) settled particle doesn’t return to purified sewage. Although the second method provided higher efficiency, the third method was selected as the most appropriate method in order to optimize the settling tank.

Keywords

Settling efficiency Re-suspension phenomenon Optimization Baffle Discrete phase model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank scientific personnel Mohammad Firoozzadeh (Mech. Eng.), operators of the company: R. Khaksari and S. Delvari for their support and insightful discussions for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gerard K (1998) Environmental engineering. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    LeChevallier MW, Au KK (2004) Water treatment and pathogen control. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevenson DG (1997) Water treatment unit processes. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammer MJ (1986) Water and wastewater technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bungay HR (1981) Shallow-depth sedimentation of biological materials. Ann N Y Acad Sci 369:335–340ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woumfo ED, Djomgoue P, Tamfuh PA, Bitom D, Figueras F, Njopwouo D (2010) Clays from the Bafang region (West Cameroon): properties and potential application as decolorizing agent of river water. Appl Clay Sci 50:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCorquodale JA (1976) Hydraulic study of the circular settling tanks at the West Windsor pollution control plant. Report submitted to Lafontaine, Cowie, Buratto and Associates Ltd Consulting Engineers, Windsor, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bretscher U, Krebs P, Hager WH (1992) Improvement of flow in final settling tanks. J Environ Eng 118:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCorquodale JA, Zhou S (1993) Effects of hydraulic and solids loading on clarifier performance. J Hydr Res 31:461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tamayol A, Firoozabadi B, Ahmadi G (2008) Effects of inlet position and baffle configuration on hydraulic performance of primary settling tanks. J Hydraul Eng 134:1004–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Sammarraee M, Chan A, Salim SM, Mahabaleswar US (2009) Large-eddy simulations of particle sedimentation in a longitudinal sedimentation basin of a water treatment plant. Part I: particle settling performance. Chem Eng J 152:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rostami F, Shahrokhi M, Said MAM, Abdullah R (2011) Numerical modeling on inlet aperture effects on flow pattern in primary settling tanks. Appl Math Model 35:3012–3020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarpagkou R, Pantokratoras A (2013) CFD methodology for sedimentation tanks: the effect of secondary phase on fluid phase using DPM coupled calculations. Appl Math Model 37:3478–3494MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo H, Ki SJ, Oh S, Kim YM, Wang S, Kim JH (2017) Numerical simulation of separation process for enhancing fine particle removal in tertiary sedimentation tank mounting adjustable baffle. Chem Eng Sci 158:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krebs P (1995) Success and shortcomings of clarifier modeling. Water Sci Technol 31:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Cock W, Blom P, Vaes G, Berlamont J (1999) The feasibility of flocculation in a storage sedimentation basin. Water Sci Technol 39:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brouckaert CJ, Buckley CA (1999) The use of computational fluid dynamics for improving the design and operation of water and wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 40:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lainé S, Phan L, Pellarin P, Robert P (1999) Operating diagnostics on a flocculator-settling tank using fluent CFD software. Water Sci Technol 39:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jayanti S, Narayanan S (2004) Computational study of particle-eddy interaction in sedimentation tanks. J Environ Eng 130:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goula AM, Kostoglou M, Karapantsios TD, Zouboulis AI (2008) A CFD methodology for the design of sedimentation tanks in potable water treatment: case study: the influence of a feed flow control baffle. Chem Eng J 140:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurent F, Vié A, Chalons C, Fox RO, Massot M (2012) A hierarchy of Eulerian models for trajectory crossing in particle-laden turbulent flows over a wide range of Stokes numbers. Annual Research Briefs of the CTR 2012, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Masi E, Simonin O (2014) Algebraic-closure-based moment method for unsteady Eulerian simulations of non-isothermal particle-laden turbulent flows at moderate stokes numbers in dilute regime. Flow Turbul Combust 92:121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaufmann A, Moreau M, Simonin O, Helie J (2008) Comparison between Lagrangian and mesoscopic Eulerian modeling approaches for inertial particles suspended in decaying isotropic turbulence. J Comput Phys 227:6448–6472ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cao J, Ahmadi G (1995) Gas-particle two-phase turbulent flow in a vertical duct. Int J Multiphase Flow 21:1203–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Clercq B, Vanrollelghem PA (2002) Computational fluid dynamics in wastewater treatment. Med Fac Landb Toegep Biol Wet 67:15–19Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morsi SAJ, Alexander AJ (1972) An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems. J Fluid Mech 55:193–208ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Battista F, Gualtieri P, Mollicone J-P, Casciola CM (2018) Application of the Exact Regularized Point Particle method (ERPP) to particle laden turbulent shear flows in the two-way coupling regime. Int J Multiphase Flow 101:113–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.01.006 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gualtieri P, Battista F, Casciola CM (2017) Turbulence modulation in heavy-loaded suspensions of tiny particles. Phys Rev Fluids 2:034304ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lyn DA, Stamou AI, Rodi W (1992) Density currents and shear-induced flocculation in sedimentation tanks. J Hydraul Eng 118:849–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Sammarraee M, Chan A (2009) Large-eddy simulations of particle sedimentation in a longitudinal sedimentation basin of a water treatment plant. Part 2: the effects of baffles. Chem Eng J 152:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mollicone J-P, Battista F, Gualtieri P, Casciola CM (2017) Exact of geometry and Reynolds number on the turbulent separated flow behind a bulge in a channel. J Fluid Mech 823:100–133ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mollicone J-P, Battista F, Gualtieri P, Casciola CM (2018) Turbulence dynamics in separated flows: the generalised Kolmogorov equation for inhomogeneous anisotropic conditions. J Fluid Mech 841:1012–1039ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringShahid Chamran University of AhvazAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations