Advertisement

Neurological alterations induced by formulated imidacloprid toxicity in Japanese quails

  • Sayed M. Rawi
  • Ayed S. Al-Logmani
  • Reham Z. HamzaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Agrochemical risk assessment that takes into account only pesticide active ingredients without the spray adjuvants will miss important toxicity outcomes detrimental to non-target species including birds. In the present study toxicity of imidacloprid (IMI) pesticide was evaluated individually and in a mixture with polyethylene glycol (PEG-600) as adjuvant against Japanese quails. Oral intubation was used to obtain concentration-mortality data. Oral intubation was used to obtain concentration-mortality data. Treatments of quails for 24 h with different doses leading to the calculation of LC50 values. PEG enhances the pesticide efficacy and the LD50 value of IMI was 17.02 mg/Kg1, and in combination with PEG it was 15.98 mg/kg−1. In the second phase of the study, the effects of a single acute dose of IMI (1/4 LD50) individually or in a mixture with PEG has a potent effect on the activity of plasma AChE and brain monoamines transmitters. However, the addition of PEG-adjuvant to the selected insecticide has shown more toxic potential, more highly significant decreases in AChE activity and different changes in cortical monoamines concentration. In the present study the maximum significant inhibition of AChE activity, was recorded post 72 h exposure to IMI individually and 96 h in a mixture with PEG and exhibited −37.56% and −32.65% decreases, respectively. Moreover, the oral intubation of IMI individually or in a mixture with PEG caused a significant elevation in the quail cortical NE and 5-HT. The result also showed while the mixture of IMI + PEG induced the more potent effect in DA alterations, IMI individually was more effective in 5-HT changes. Our findings also indicated that PEG exposure induced remarkable changes in the studied monoamines level and the values were significant throughout the tested periods in DA. Moreover, the studied dose level was vigorously affected quail brain cerebral cortex histological structure. When administered individually or in a mixture with PEG, IMI disclosed neural congestion, neuronal degeneration, pyknosis and perivascular cuffing with glial cells.

Keywords

PEG-600 Imidacloprid Histopathology Neuroalterations Neurotransmitters Japanese quails 

Abbreviations

5-HT

Serotonin

AchE

Acetylcholinesterase

DA

Dopamine

IMI

Imidacloprid

LD50

Dose that induced 50% mortlality

NE

Norepinephrine

PEG-600

Polyethylene glycol-600

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by King Abdualaziz University (Scientific Research (DSR) Deanship), Grant No. 857-200- D1435. Entitled: Role of Adjuvants on the physiological effects on organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides.

References

  1. Ahmad A, Rasheed N, Banu N, Palit G (2010) Alterations in monoamine levels and oxidative systems in frontal cortex, striatum, and hippocampus of the rat brain during chronic unpredictable stress. Stress 13(4):355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alyokhin A, Dively G, Patterson M, Castaldo C, Rogers D, Mahoney M, Wollam J (2007) Resistance and cross-resistance to imidacloprid and thiamethoxamin the Colorado potato beetle. Pest Manag Sci 63:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avery ML, Decker DG, Fischer DL (1994) Cage and flight pen evaluation of avian repellency and hazard associated with imidacloprid-treated rice seed. Crop Prot 13:535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass C, Puinean AM, Zimmer CT, Denholm I, Field LM, Stephen P (2014) The evolution of insecticide resistance in the peach potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 51:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass C, Denholm I, Martin S, Williamson MS, Nauen R (2015) The global status of insect resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides. Pestic Biochem Physiol 121:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendele AM, McComb J, Gould T, Frazier J, Chlipala E, Seely J, Kieft G, Edwards CK (1999) Effects of PEGylated soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type I (PEG sTNF-RI) alone and in combination with methotrexate in adjuvant arthritic rats. Clin Exp Rheumatol 17:553–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonansea RI, Wunderlin DA, Amé MV (2016) Behavioral swimming effects and acetylcholinesterase activity changes in Jenynsia multidentata exposed to chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin individually and in mixtures. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 129:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burbacher TM (1993) Neurotoxic effects of gasoline and gasoline constituents. Environ Health Perspect 101(6):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casida JE, Durkin KA (2013) Neuroactive insecticides: targets, selectivity, resistance, and secondary effects. Annu Rev Entomol 58:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho Y-E, Lee M-H, Song B-J (2017) Neuronal cell death and degeneration through increased Nitroxidative stress and tau phosphorylation in HIV-1 transgenic rats. PLoS One 12(1):e0169945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clements J, Schoville S, Peterson N, Lan Q, Russell L (2016) Groves characterizing molecular mechanisms of imidacloprid resistance in select populations of Leptinotarsa decemlineata in the central sands region of Wisconsin. PLoS One 11(1):e0147844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox C (2001) Insecticide factsheet: imidacloprid. J Pestic Reform 21:15–11Google Scholar
  13. de Oliveira IM, Nunes BV, Barbosa DR, Pallares AM, Faro LR (2010) Effects of the neonicotinoids thiametoxam and clothianidin on in vivo dopamine release in rat striatum. Toxicol Lett 192:294–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edgington AN, Sheridan PM, Stephenson GR, Thompson DG, Boermans HJ (2004) Comparative effects of pH and vision herbicide on two life stages of four anuran amphibian species. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V Jr, Featherstone RM (1961) A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95Google Scholar
  16. Finney DJ (1952) Probit analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Ge W, Yan S, Wang J, Zhu L, Chen A, Wang J (2015) Oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by imidacloprid in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Agric Food Chem 63(6):1856–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbons D, Morrissey C, Mineau P (2015) A review of the direct and indirect effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on vertebrate wildlife. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorun V, Proinov I, Balaban V, Balaban G, Barzu O (1978) Modified Ellman procedure for assay of cholinesterase in crude enzymatic preparations. Anal Biochem 86:324–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goulson D (2013) An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J Appl Ecol 50:977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grewal KK, Sandhu GS, Kaur R, Brar RS, Sandhu HS (2015) Toxic impacts of cypermethrin on behavior and histology of certain tissues of albino rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herold DA, Rodeheaver GT, Bellamy WT, Edlich RF (1982) Toxicity of topical polyethylene glycol. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 65(2):329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humason GL (1972) Animal tissue techniques. Ferdman, W. Hand Co, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishida T, Li W, Liu Z, Kiwada H (2006) Stimulatory effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) on gene expression in mouse liver following hydrodynamics-based transfection. Genet Med J 8:324–334Google Scholar
  25. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A (2011) Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem 59:2897–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawthar AED, Aida IE, Abd-Elmoneim OM, Sharaf HA (2012) Assessment of genotoxicity and histopathological changes induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) in male mice. J Cytol Histol 3(5):1000153Google Scholar
  27. Khalil SR, Awad A, Mohammed HH, Nassan MA (2017) Imidacloprid insecticide exposure induces stress and disrupts glucose homeostasis in male rats. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 55:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kinawy A (2009) Impact of gasoline inhalation on some neurobehavioural characteristics of male rats. BMC Physiol 9:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Köhler HR, Triebskorn R (2013) Wildlife ecotoxicology of pesticides: can we track effects to the population level and beyond? Science 341:759–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koprowska M, Krotewicz M, Romaniuk A, Strzelczuk M (2004) Age-related changes in fear behavior and regional brain monoamines distribution in rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp 64:131–142Google Scholar
  31. Lang AE, Riherd Methner DN, Ferreira A (2014) Neuronal degeneration, synaptic defects, and behavioral abnormalities in tau45-230 transgenic mice. Neuroscience 275:322–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Litchfield JT, Wilcoxon FA (1949) Simplified method of evaluating dose effect experiments. J Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 96:99–113Google Scholar
  33. Mach M, Grubbs RD, Price WA, Paton SJ, Lucot JB (2004) Behavioral changes after acetylcholinesterase inhibition with physostigmine in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 79(3):533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez MA, Ares I, Rodríguez JL, Martínez M, Martínez-Larrañaga MR, Anadón A (2018) Neurotransmitter changes in rat brain regions following glyphosate exposure. Environ Res 161:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Millot F, Decors A, Mastain O, Quintaine T, Berny P, Vey D, Lasseur R, Bro E (2017) Field evidence of bird poisonings by imidacloprid-treated seeds: A review of incidents reported by the French SAGIR network from 1995 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(6):5469–5485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moser VC, Hunter DL, Marshall RS, Mcdaniel K, Phillips P, Padilla SJ (2006) Correlations of pesticide-induced cholinesterase inhibition and motor activity changes in adult rats. Behav Toxicol Soc 15:1006Google Scholar
  37. Özdemir S, Altun S, Arslan H (2018) Imidacloprid exposure cause the histopathological changes, activation of TNF-α, iNOS, 8-OHdG biomarkers, and alteration of caspase 3, iNOS, CYP1A, MT1 gene expression levels in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Toxicol Rep 5:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pagel P, Blome J, Wolf HU (2000) High-performance liquid chromatographic separation and measurement of various biogenic compounds possibly involved in the pathomechanism of Parkinson’s disease. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 746:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pomierny B, Starek A, Krzyżanowska W, Starek-Swiechowicz B, Smaga I, Pomierny-Chamioło L, Regulska M, Budziszewska B (2013) Potential neurotoxic effect of ethylene glycol ethers mixtures. Pharmacol Rep 65(5):1415–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prosser P, Hart ADM (2005) Assessing potential exposure of birds to pesticide-treated seeds. Ecotoxicol 14:679–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Puinean AM, Foster SP, Oliphant L, Denholm I, Field LM, Millar NS, Williamson MS, Bass C (2010) Amplification of a cytochrome P450 gene is associated with resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in the aphid Myzus persicae. PLoS Genet 6(6):e1000999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qadir S, Latif A, Ali M, Iqbal F (2014) Effects of Imidacloprid on the hematological and serum biochemical profile of Labeo rohita. Pakistan J Zool 46(4):1085–1090Google Scholar
  43. Randhawa MA (2009) Calculation of LD50 values from the method of miller and Tainter, 1944. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 21:184–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rawi SM, Al-Hazmi MA, Waggas AM (2013) The effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG-600) on the acute neurotoxicity of different types of pesticides. Int J Manag Sci Bus 2(7):62–72Google Scholar
  45. Regulska M, Pomierny B, Basta-Kaim A, Starek A, Filip M, Lason W, Budziszewska B (2010) Effects of ethylene glycol ethers on cell viability in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line. Pharmacol Rep 62:1243–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rodrigue JR, Balistreri W, Haber B, Jonas MM, Mohan P, Molleston JP, Murray KF, Narkewicz MR, Rosenthal P, Smith LJ, Lobritto SJ, Schwarz KB, Robuck PR, Barton B, González-Peralta RP (2011) Peginterferon with or without ribavirin has minimal effect on quality of life, behavioral/emotional, and cognitive outcomes in children. Hepatology 53:1468–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodrigues KJ, Santana MB, Do Nascimento JL, Picanco-Diniz DL, Maues LA et al (2017) Behavioral and biochemical effects of neonicotinoid thiamethoxam on the cholinergic system in rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodriguez JL, Ares I, Martinez M, Martinez-Larranaga MR, Anadon A, Martinez MA (2016) Effect of exposure to pyrethroid Cyfluthrin on serotonin and dopamine levels in brain region of male rats. Environ Res 146:388–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simon-Delso N, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bonmatin JM, Chagnon M, Downs C, Furlan L, Gibbons DW, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke CH, Liess M, Long E, McField M, Mineau P, Mitchell EAD, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Pisa L, Settele J, Stark JD, Tapparo A, Van Dyck H, Van Praagh J, Van der Sluijs JP, Whitehorn PR, Wiemers M (2015) Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stills JHF (2005) Adjuvants and antibody production: dispelling the myths associated with Freund's complete and other adjuvants. ILAR J 46:280–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Szendrei Z, Grafius E, Byrne A, Ziegler A (2012) Resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides in field populations of the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pest Manag Sci 68:941–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tennekes HA, Sánchez-Bayo F (2011) Time-dependent toxicity of neonicotinoids and other toxicants: implications for a new approach to risk assessment. J Environ Anal Toxicol S4:001Google Scholar
  53. Tufi S, Stel JM, de Boer J, Lamoree MH, Leonards PE (2015) Metabolomics to explore Imidacloprid-induced toxicity in the central nervous system of the freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis. Environ Sci Technol 49(24):14529–14536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. US EPA (2012) United States environmental protection agency ecological risk assessmentGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang J, Wang J, Wang G, Zhu L, Wang J (2016) DNA damage and oxidative stress induced by imidacloprid exposure in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Chemosphere 144:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wankhede V, Hedau M, Ingole RS, Hajare SW, Wade WR (2017) Histopathological alterations induced by subacute imidacloprid toxicity in Japanese quails and its amelioration by Butea monosperma. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6(3):252–257Google Scholar
  57. Webster R, Didier E, Harris P, Siegel N, Stadler J, Tilbury L, Smith D (2007) PEGylated proteins: Evaluation of their safety in the absence of definitive metabolism studies. Drug Metab Dispos 35(1):9–16Google Scholar
  58. Wieder KJ, Davis FF (1983) Enzyme therapy: II. Effect of covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol on biochemical parameters and immunological determinants of beta-glucosidase and alpha-galactosidase. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 5:337–347Google Scholar
  59. Wood TJ, Goulson D (2017) The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(21):17285–17325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang Y, Han Y, Liu B, Yang Q, Guo H, Liu Z, Wang L, Fan J (2017) Resistance monitoring and cross-resistance role of CYP6CW1 between buprofezin and pymetrozine in field populations of Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén). Sci Rep 7:14639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhu YC, Yao J, Adamczyk J, Luttrell R (2017) Feeding toxicity and impact of imidacloprid formulation and mixtures with six representative pesticides at residue concentrations on honey bee physiology (Apis mellifera). PLoS One 12(6):e0178421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology Department, Faculty of SciencesKing Abdualaziz UniversityJeddahKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences and ArtsJeddah UniversityKhulaisKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Zoology Department, Faculty of ScienceCairo UniversityCairoEgypt
  4. 4.Biology Department, Faculty of ScienceTaif UniversityTaifKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  5. 5.Zoology Department, Faculty of ScienceZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations