Advertisement

Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

, Volume 450, Issue 1–2, pp 187–198 | Cite as

Response of DNA damage genes in acrolein-treated lung adenocarcinoma cells

  • Poonam Sarkar
Article
  • 109 Downloads

Abstract

Acrolein is a α-β-unsaturated aldehyde and is toxic to human upon its exposure from the environment. Sources of exposure to acrolein can be from heating cooking oil, automobile exhaust, tobacco smoke, and plastic waste. Acrolein exposure to lung is a major concern because of its volatile nature and due to its presence in the urban atmospheric air. Acrolein being highly reactive forms DNA and protein adducts, thereby making the cells vulnerable to long-term damage. Such long-term effect can lead to high susceptibility towards malignant transformation as has been reported in cigarette smokers. The response of DNA damaging genes by acrolein can perhaps give an insight to the cause of damage in the DNA by acrolein. The aim of this study was to examine the response of the DNA damage responsive genes by acrolein in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells. Acrolein treatment at IC50 concentration showed a robust response of the DNA repair genes but eventually failed to rescue the cells from undergoing apoptosis. The cells pretreated with acrolein and followed by growing the same cells in fresh medium in the absence of acrolein did not help the cells to proliferate. These results conclude that exposure to acrolein marks long-lasting damage to DNA, irrespective of the DNA repair response.

Keywords

Acrolein A549 DNA damage Signaling RAD51 GADD45G 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication was supported in part by research infrastructure support from Grant Numbers RR0304518 and CO6 RR012537 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). The author would like to extend thanks to Prof. Barbara E. Hayes for her continued support and encouragement during the course of this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Moghe A, Ghare S, Lamoreau B, Mohammad M, Barve S, McClain C, Joshi-Barve S (2015) Molecular mechanisms of acrolein toxicity: relevance to human disease. Toxicol Sci 143:242–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aldini G, Orioli M, Carini M (2011) Protein modification by acrolein: relevance to pathological conditions and inhibition by aldehyde sequestering agents. Mol Nutr Food Res 55:1301–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevens JF1, Maier CS (2008) Acrolein: sources, metabolism, and biomolecular interactions relevant to human health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res 52(1):7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang IY, Johnson F, Grollman AP, Moriya M (2002) Genotoxic mechanism for the major acrolein-derived deoxyguanosine adduct in human cells. Chem Res Toxicol 15:160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheah NP1, Pennings JL, Vermeulen JP, van Schooten FJ, Opperhuizen A (2013) In vitro effects of aldehydes present in tobacco smoke on gene expression in human lung alveolar epithelial cells. Toxicol In Vitro 27:1072–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarkar P, Hayes BE (2007) Induction of COX-2 by acrolein in rat lung epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biochem 301:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun Y, Ito S, Nishio N, Tanaka Y, Chen N, Liu L, Isobe K (2015) Enhancement of the acrolein-induced production of reactive oxygen species and lung injury by GADD34. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2015:170309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwolek-Mirek M, Zadrąg-Tęcza R, Bednarska S, Bartosz G (2015) Acrolein-induced oxidative stress and cell death exhibiting features of apoptosis in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae deficient in SOD1. Cell Biochem Biophys 71:1525–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang HT, Hu Y, Tong D, Huang J, Gu L, Wu XR, Chung FL, Li GM, Tang MS (2012) Effect of carcinogenic acrolein on DNA repair and mutagenic susceptibility. J Biol Chem 287:12379–12386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beyfuss K, Hood DA (2018) A systematic review of p53 regulation of oxidative stress in skeletal muscle. Redox Rep 23(1):100–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ba X, Boldogh I (2018) 8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1: beyond repair of the oxidatively modified base lesions. Redox Biol 14:669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang S, Balbo S, Wang M, Hecht SS (2011) Analysis of acrolein-derived 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adducts in human leukocyte DNA from smokers and nonsmokers. Chem Res Toxicol 24:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanuri M, Minko IG, Nechev LV, Harris TM, Harris CM, Lloyd RS (2002) Error prone translesion synthesis past gamma-hydroxypropano deoxyguanosine, the primary acrolein-derived adduct in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 277:18257–18265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    VanderVeen LA, Hashim MF, Nechev LV, Harris TM, Harris CM, Marnett LJ (2001) Evaluation of the mutagenic potential of the principal DNA adduct of acrolein. J Biol Chem 27600:9066–9070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Inoue-Choi M, Liao LM, Reyes-Guzman C, Hartge P, Caporaso N, Freedman ND (2017) Association of long-term, low-intensity smoking with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. JAMA Intern Med 177:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burcham PC (2017) Acrolein and human disease: untangling the knotty exposure scenarios accompanying several diverse disorders. Chem Res Toxicol 30:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarkar P, Hayes BE (2009) Proteomic profiling of rat lung epithelial cells induced by acrolein. Life Sci 85:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thompson CA1, Burcham PC (2008) Protein alkylation, transcriptional responses and cytochrome c release during acrolein toxicity in A549 cells: influence of nucleophilic culture media constituents. Toxicol In Vitro 22:844–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hassan HM, Dave BJ, Singh RK (2014) TP73, an under-appreciated player in non-Hodgkin lymphoma pathogenesis and management. Curr Mol Med 14:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tamura RE, de Vasconcellos JF, Sarkar D, Libermann TA, Fisher PB, Zerbini LF (2012) GADD45 proteins: central players in tumorigenesis. Curr Mol Med 12:634–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zerbini LF, Libermann TA (2005) Life and death in cancer. GADD45 alpha and gamma are critical regulators of NF-kappaB mediated escape from programmed cell death. Cell Cycle 4:18–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhattacharjee S, Nandi S (2016) Choices have consequences: the nexus between DNA repair pathways and genomic instability in cancer. Clin Transl Med 5(1):45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choy MS, Yusoff P, Lee IC, Newton JC, Goh CW, Page R, Shenolikar S, Peti W (2015) Structural and functional analysis of the GADD34:PP1 eIF2α phosphatase. Cell Rep 11:1885–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zarcone MC, Duistermaat E, Alblas MJ, van Schadewijk A, Ninaber DK, Clarijs V, Moerman MM, Vaessen D, Hiemstra PS, Kooter IM (2018) Effect of diesel exhaust generated by a city bus engine on stress responses and innate immunity in primary bronchial epithelial cell cultures. Toxicol In Vitro 48:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tambini CE, Spink KG, Ross CJ, Hill MA, Thacker J (2010) The importance of XRCC2 in RAD51-related DNA damage repair. DNA Repair 9:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hong WX, Ye JB, Chen MT, Yan Y, Zhou GF, Yang XF, Yang L, Ren XH, Huang HY, Zhou L, Huang XF, Zhuang ZX, Liu JJ (2013) Trichloroethylene induces biphasic concentration-dependent changes in cell proliferation and the expression of SET-associated proteins in human hepatic L-02 cells. Biomed Environ Sci 26:618–621Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salvador JM, Brown-Clay JD, Fornace AJ Jr (2013) Gadd45 in stress signaling, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 793:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luo J, Robinson JP, Shi R (2005) Acrolein-induced cell death in PC12 cells: role of mitochondria-mediated oxidative stress. Neurochem Int 47:449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moretto N, Bertolini S, Iadicicco C, Marchini G, Kaur M, Volpi G, Patacchini R, Singh D, Facchinetti F (2012) Cigarette smoke and its component acrolein augment IL-8/CXCL8 mRNA stability via p38 MAPK/MK2 signaling in human pulmonary cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 303:L929-938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kowalska M, Wegierek-Ciuk A, Brzoska K, Wojewodzka M, Meczynska-Wielgosz S, Gromadzka-Ostrowska J, Mruk R, Øvrevik J, Kruszewski M, Lankoff A (2017) Genotoxic potential of diesel exhaust particles from the combustion of first- and second-generation biodiesel fuels-the FuelHealth project. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:24223–24234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chung KC, Park JH, Kim CH, Lee HW, Sato N, Uchiyama Y, Ahn YS (2000) Novel biphasic effect of pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate on neuronal cell viability is mediated by the differential regulation of intracellular zinc and copper ion levels, NF-kappaB, and MAP kinases. Neurosci Res 59:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee YJ, Jeong HY, Kim YB, Lee YJ, Won SY, Shim JH, Cho MK, Nam HS, Lee H (2012) Reactive oxygen species and PI3K/Akt signaling play key roles in the induction of Nrf2-driven heme oxygenase-1 expression in sulforaphane-treated human mesothelioma MSTO-211H cells. Food ChemToxicol 50:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aylon Y, Kupiec M (2004) DSB repair: the yeast paradigm. DNA Repair 3(8–9):797–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE (2005) Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39:431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Pharmacy and Health SciencesTexas Southern UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Cancer CenterBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations