Advertisement

Forgiveness as institution: a Merleau-Pontian account

  • Bryan LueckEmail author
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Recent literature on forgiveness suggests that a successful account of the phenomenon must satisfy at least three conditions: it must be able to explain how forgiveness can be articulate, uncompromising, and elective. These three conditions are not logically inconsistent, but the history of reflection on the ethics of forgiveness nonetheless suggests that they are in tension. Accounts that emphasize articulateness and uncompromisingness tend to suggest an excessively deflationary understanding of electiveness, underestimating the degree to which forgiveness is a gift. Accounts that emphasize electiveness, on the other hand, tend to weaken the safeguards that keep forgiveness distinct from condonation, excuse, or mere servility. I argue in this paper that we can do justice to the three conditions by understanding forgiveness in terms of the concept of institution that Maurice Merleau-Ponty developed in his work from the early- to mid-1950s.

Keywords

Forgiveness Institution Maurice Merleau-Ponty Ethics Phenomenology Expression 

Notes

References

  1. Allais, Lucy. 2013. Elective forgiveness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (5): 637–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allais, Lucy. 2008. Wiping the slate clean: The heart of forgiveness. Philosophy & Public Affairs 36 (1): 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, Joseph. 2006. Fifteen sermons. In The works of Bishop Butler, ed. David E. White. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  4. Couto, Alexandra. 2016. Reactive attitudes, forgiveness, and the second-person standpoint. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5): 1309–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness (trans: Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Dolto-Marette, Françoise. 1947. Hypothèse nouvelle concernant les réactions dites de jalousie à la naissance d’un puîné. Psyché 7: 524–530.Google Scholar
  7. Griswold, Charles. 2007. Forgiveness: A philosophical exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hieronymi, Pamela. 2001. Articulating an uncompromising forgiveness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3): 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 2005. Forgiveness (trans: Andrew Kelley). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals in Practical Philosophy, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Ed. and (trans. Mary J. Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kekes, John. 2009. Blame versus forgiveness. The Monist 92 (4): 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolnai, Aurel. 1973. Forgiveness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Landes, Donald A. 2013. Merleau-Ponty and the paradoxes of expression. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  14. Maclaren, Kym. 2017. The ‘Entre-Deux’ of emotions: Emotions as institutions. In Perception and its development in Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology, ed. Kirsten Jacobson and John Russon. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  15. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception (trans. Donald A. Landes). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2010. Institution and Passivity: Course Notes from the Collège de France (19541955) (trans: Leonard Lawlor and Heath Massey). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1973. The Prose of the World. Ed. Claude Lefort; (trans: John O’Neill). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964a. Signs (trans: Richard C. McCleary). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964b. The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History, and Politics. Ed. James M. Edie. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Jean Hampton. 1988. Forgiveness and Mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neblett, William R. 1974. Forgiveness and ideals. Mind 83 (330): 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. North, Joanna. 1987. Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy 62 (242): 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Novitz, David. 1998. Forgiveness and self-respect. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2): 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saussure, Ferdinand. 1986. Course in General Linguistics (trans: Roy Harris). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  25. Sussman, David. 2005. Kantian forgiveness. Kant-Studien 96 (1): 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Swinburne, Richard. 1989. Responsibility and atonement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tutu, Desmond. 1999. No future without forgiveness. London and Johannesburg: Random House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ware, Owen. 2014. Forgiveness and respect for persons. American Philosophical Quartlerly 51(3):247–260.Google Scholar
  29. Zaibert, Leo. 2009. The paradox of forgiveness. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (3): 365–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations