Advertisement

Motor intentionality and the intentionality of improvisation: a contribution to a phenomenology of musical improvisation

  • Lucia Angelino
Review Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The intentionality of improvisation represents surely one of the most pressing and controversial issues in contemporary action theory: how do we find the way to characterize the proper intentionality of improvisation, which is an unplanned yet intentional action? This article will address this question bringing together Merleau-Ponty’s motor intentionality and Bergson’s conception of duration. My argument will unfold in three main stages. First, I will briefly describe the traditional scheme that is used to think of intentional action in contemporary action theory and discuss how the phenomenon of improvisation casts doubts on it. Second, I will outline an initial, and provisional account of improvisation by crossing the descriptions of musical improvisation provided by Jankélévitch with the testimonials of two improvisatory composers—Enrico Pieranunzi and Keith Jarrett—and reports from Charles Rosen, an American pianist and Roger Sessions, an American composer. Finally, I will refine the basic concepts and lay out a phenomenological account of improvisation, by extending and applying the phenomenological notion of motor intentionality to the examples and testimonials gathered from the observation of a specific kind of improvisatory activity—musical composition. This methodology is intended to contrast both with more standard philosophical approaches based on hypothetical examples, and with more standard laboratory-based methodologies in cognitive sciences, psychology, and experimental philosophy. Overall, this approach is intended to redress the balance of action theory—one-sided directed towards planning, as a key aspect of human agency—with an analysis of the bodily and responsive aspect of intentionality.

Keywords

Phenomenology Aesthetic experience Musical improvisation Motor intentionality The intentionality of improvisation 

References

  1. Anscombe, G.E.M. 2000. Intention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Angelino, Lucia. 2015. Le movement vécu dans l’improvisation musicale. In Quand le geste fait sens, ed. Lucia Angelino, 53–73. Milan-Paris: Mimesis-Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Angelino, Lucia. 2014. Entre voir et tracer. Merleau-Ponty et le mouvement vécu dans l’expérience esthétique. Milan-Paris: Mimesis-Vrin.Google Scholar
  4. Benveniste, Emile. 1996. Problèmes de linguistique générale, vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, Henri. 1902. L’effort intellectuel’, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, LIII: (January-June, 1902), 1–27.Google Scholar
  6. Bertinetto, Alessandro. 2015. Mind the Gap. L’improvvisazione come azione intenzionale. Itinera 10: 175–188.Google Scholar
  7. Bertinetto, Alessandro. 2013. Performing Imagination. The Aesthetics of Improvisation. Klesis 28: 62–96.Google Scholar
  8. Bertinetto, Alessandro. 2012. Performing the Unexpected. Improvisation and Artistic Creativity. Daimon 57: 117–135.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brand, Myles. 1986. Intentional Action and Plans. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bratman, Michael. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Reprinted in The David Hume Series of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1999). Originally published by Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. Canonne, Clément. 2014. Sur l’Ontologie de l’Improvisation. In Ontologie Musicale: Perspectives et Débat, ed. A. Arbo and M. Ruta, 279–320. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  13. De Raymond, J.-F. 1980. L’improvisation. Contribution à la philosophie de l’action. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, John. 2005. Art as Experience. Penguin: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gilson, Etienne. 1959. Painting and Reality. University of Michigan: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. James Jerome, Gibson. 1997. The Theory of Affordance. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing, ed. R.E. Shaw, J. Bransford, N.J. Hillsdale, and L. Erlbaum. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 1998. Liszt Rhapsodie et Improvisation. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  18. Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 1989. De la musique au silence. Tome V. Liszt et la rhapsodie. Essai sur la virtuosité. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  19. Jarrett, Keith. 1994. Keith, Il mio desiderio feroce. Conversazioni con Kunihiko Yamashita. Roma: Edizioni Socrates.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, 10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, Mark, and Lakoff, George. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Maldiney, Henri. 1973. L’esthétique des rythmes. In Regard, Parole, Espace, ed. Henri Maldiney. Lausanne: Editions l’Age d’homme.Google Scholar
  23. Alfred, R. 1992. Springs of Action: Understanding Intentional Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2007a. Phenomenology of Perception. (trans: Colin Smith). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2007b. Indirect Language and the Voices of Silence. In The Merleau-Ponty Reader, ed. T. Toadvine and L. Lawlor. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2009. Le plaisir au dessin. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  27. Pacherie, Elizabeth. 2003. ‘La dynamique des intentions’. Dialogue 42: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pareyson, Luigi. 2007. Théorie de la formativité. Paris: Editions Rue D’Ulm/Presses de L’Ecole normale supérieure.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pieranunzi, Enrico. 2010. Interview accessible on-line at the following address: http://www.pianosolo.it/intervista-ad-enrico-pieranunzi/.
  30. Pieranunzi, Enrico. 2002. Notes de pochette de Trasnoche (sound recording).Google Scholar
  31. Preston, Beth. 2013. A Philosophy of Material Culture. New York & London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosen, Charles. 2002. Piano Notes. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rousselot, Mathias. 2012. Étude sur l’improvisation musicale. Le témoin de l’instant. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  34. Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sessions, Roger. 1971. The Musical Experience of Composer, Performer, Listener. Princeton, New Jersy: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (AIAS)Aarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations