Advertisement

Characteristics and Classification of the Geothermal Gradient in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Plain, China

  • Xinwei Wang
  • Xiang MaoEmail author
  • Xiaoping Mao
  • Kewen Li
Special Issue
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Study of the characteristics and classification of geothermal gradients can effectively guide the exploration and development of geothermal resources. In this paper, we systematically compare the relationship between the distribution of the geothermal gradient and its basin structure, and numerically model the heat conduction course of typical geothermal–geological profiles. The results show that the distribution of the geothermal gradient in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Plain exhibits the characteristics of east–west zonation, north–south segmentation, and vertical stratification. From west to east, the basin structure can be divided into five belts, viz. the western sag, the central bulge, the eastern sag, the Cangxian uplift, and the Cangdong sag belts. The heat flow and the geothermal gradient of the cap rocks in the basal bulge/uplift belts are higher than in the sag belts. From north to south, the basin structure of the Jizhong depression is subdivided into the northern, middle, and southern segments by the Xushui-Anxin and Hengshui Faults. It also shows an obvious distribution of low and high geothermal gradient interphases, which are similar to their upper and lower basement. Vertically, the geothermal gradient in the bulge/uplift belts exhibits an asymmetrical “mirror reflection” structure. Abnormal geothermal gradient distributions are observed, being confined to the basement uplift belts caused by the tectonic movement which led to the heterogeneity of the horizontal and vertical heat conduction capacity. Therefore, according to the corresponding relationship between the amplitude of the basement uplifting and the size of the geothermal gradient of the cap rock, the geothermal gradient of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Plain can be divided into five categories, of high convex, convex, low convex, deep buried, and exposed types. Among these, the high convex and convex types are the primary targets for geothermal exploration and development.

Keywords

Geothermal gradient Numerical modeling Geothermal reservoir type The Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Plain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Sinopec research funding for projects (JP14009, JKL18033, JKL18035). The authors would also like to thank Dr. Jinxia Liu, Dr. Zongying Zhou, Dr. Shaoqiang Sui, and Dr. Lu Ji for their support in finishing this study.

References

  1. Axelsson G, Mongillo MA, Axelsson G (2010) Sustainable geothermal utilization—case histories; definitions; research issues and modelling. Geothermics 39(4):283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cermark V, Rybach L (1989) Vertical distribution of heat production in the continental Crust. Tectonophysics 159:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang J, Qiu NS, Zhao XZ (2016) Present-day geothermal regime of the Jizhong depression in Bohaiwan basin, East China. Chin J Geophys 59(3):1003–1016Google Scholar
  4. Chapman DS, Rybach L (1985) Heat flow anomalies and their interpretations. J Geodynamics 4:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen MX, Deng X (1990) The map of geothermal gradient of Cenozoic sedimentary cover in the North China plain and its brief explanation. Sci Geol Sin 3:270–277Google Scholar
  6. Dong DW, Li L, Liu J, Li JY (2013) Cenozoic tectonic evolution in the north-central Jizhong Depression. Oil Gas Geol 34(6):771–780Google Scholar
  7. Gong YL, Wang LS, Liu SW, Li C (2003) Distribution characteristics of terrestrial heat flow in Jiyang Depression. Sci China 33(4):384–391Google Scholar
  8. Lao HG, Wu KY, Chen QH (2010) Geologic character and evolution of the accommodation zone in the Jizhong depression. J Geomech 16(3):223–310Google Scholar
  9. Lee WHK (1970) On the global variations or terrestrial heat flow. Phys Earth Planet Inter 2:332–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lund JW, Freeston DH, Boyda TL (2011) Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2010 worldwide review. Geothermics 40:159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma G, Chang EX, Zhou RL (1983) A preliminary investigation on the characteristics of a geothermal field and the conditions for its formation in the northern part of the North China plain. Bull 562 Compr Geol Brigade Chin Acad Geol Sci 4:109–126Google Scholar
  12. Qiao HS, Fang CL, Niu JY, Guan DS (2002) Petroleum geology of deep horizon in Bohaiwan Basin. Petroleum Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. Tao SZ, Liu DL (2000) Geothermal field characteristics of Tanlu Fault Zone and its neighboring regions, thermal spring genesis and its composition. Nat Gas Ind 20(6):42–47Google Scholar
  14. Wang JY (2015) Geothermics and its application. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang LS, Liu SW, Xiao WY, Li C (2002) Distribution characteristics of terrestrial heat flow in Bohaiwan Basin. Chin Sci Bull 47(2):151–155Google Scholar
  16. Wu KY, Wang YJ, Li ZQ (2010) Palaeo-karst development model of the Pre-Tertiary carbonate rock in Jizhong depression. Carsol Sin 29(4):402–409Google Scholar
  17. Wu WT, Gao XZ, Li L, Zhang DW, Liu B (2015) Favorable conditions formed in large-scale burial-hill reservoir in Bohaiwan Basin. Special Oil Gas Reserv 22(2):22–26Google Scholar
  18. Xiong LP, Zhang JM (1984) Mathematical simulation of refract and redistribution of the flow. Sci Geol Sin 4:454–455Google Scholar
  19. Xiong LP, Zhang JM (1988) Relationship between geothermal gradient and the relief of basement rock in North China plain. Acta Geophys Sin 31(2):146–155Google Scholar
  20. Yan DS, Yu YT (2000) Evaluation and utilization of geothermal resources in oil and gas area of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. University of Geosciences Press, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  21. Yang MH (2009) Transfer structure and its relation to hydrocarbon exploration in Bohaiwan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica 30(6):816–823Google Scholar
  22. Yuan Y, Zhu W, Mi L, Zhang G, Hu S, He L (2009) “Uniform geothermal gradient” and heat flow in the Qiongdongnan and Pearl River Mouth Basins of the South China Sea. Mar Pet Geol 26(7):1152–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang WC, Cui ZQ, Han CY (2001) Evolution of palaeogene lacustrine basins and oil and gas potentials in the central Hebei depression. J Palaeogeogr 3(1):45–54Google Scholar
  24. Zhou RL (1987) The activity of deep underground water in the northern part of the North China Plain and its effect on the geothermal field. China Acad Geol Sci 562 Brigade 6:17–35Google Scholar
  25. Zhou RL, Liu QS, Zhang J, Yang LQ (1989) The geological characteristics and its development prospect of high uplift type geothermal field basin on Niutuozhen bedrock in North China faulted basin. China Acad Geol Sci Brigade 7(8):21–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sinopec Star Petroleum Corporation LimitedBeijingChina
  2. 2.China University of Geosciences (Beijing)BeijingChina
  3. 3.Stanford Geothermal ProgramStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations