Advertisement

Sniping in soft-close online auctions: empirical evidence from overstock

  • Wen Cao
  • Qinyang Sha
  • Zhiyong YaoEmail author
  • Dingwei Gu
  • Xiang Shao
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The existing studies suggest that sniping is an equilibrium strategy in hard-close online auctions, but not in soft-close ones. In this paper, we use a unique, large-scale data set from soft-close Overstock and hard-close eBay to document sniping phenomena under the two different closing rules. Estimation results show that sniping is prominent on both websites, but they are prevalent at different times. On eBay, sniping occurs right before the auction close, while on Overstock sniping happens predominantly in a short window of time before the triggering period, during which any additional high bid automatically extends the online auction. Furthermore, the revenue effect of sniping is significantly stronger on Overstock than on eBay.

Keywords

Sniping Hard-close auctions Soft-close auctions Revenue effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous referees and the editor for their highly constructive and valuable comments and suggestions. The authors contributed equally to this paper. The usual caveat applies.

Funding information

This research is supported by the China National Natural Science Foundation (71873036), HKU-Fudan IMBA joint research fund (JRF1718_0601), and Shanghai Pujiang Talent Program (13PJC009).

References

  1. Bajari, P., & Hortaçsu, A. (2003). Winner’s curse, reserve prices and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, J., & Morgan, J. (2009). How much is a dollar worth? Tipping versus equilibrium coexistence on competing online auction sites. Journal of Political Economy, 117, 668–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, T. Y., Kadiyali, V., & Park, Y. H. (2007). Willingness to pay and competition in online auctions. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 324–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng, C., Fay, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2016). Overbidding in electronic auctions: factors influencing the propensity to overbid and the magnitude of overbidding. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glover, B., & Raviv, Y. (2012). Revenue non-equivalence between auctions with soft and hard closing mechanisms: new evidence from yahoo! Journal of Behavior and Organization, 81, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gray, S., & Reiley, D. (2013). Measuring the benefits to sniping on eBay: evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economics and Management, 9, 137–152.Google Scholar
  7. Hossain, T. (2008). Learning by bidding. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Houser, D., & Wooders, J. (2005). Hard and soft closes: a field experiment on auction closing rules. In A. Rapoport & R. Zwick (Eds.), Experimental business research (pp. 123–131). Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Livingston, J. (2010). The behavior of inexperienced bidders in internet auctions. Economic Inquiry, 48, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malaga, R., Porter, D., & Or, K. (2010). A new end-of-auction model for curbing sniping. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(8), 1265–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ockenfels, A., & Roth, A. (2006). Late and multiple bidding in second price online auctions: theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Park, Y. H., & Bradlow, E. T. (2005). An integrated model for bidding behavior in internet auctions: whether, who, when, and how much. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rasmusen, E. (2006). Strategic implications of uncertainty over one’s own private value in auctions. Advances in Theoretical Economics, 6(1), 1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roth, A., & Ockenfels, A. (2002). Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the internet. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schindler, J. (2003). Late bidding on the internet. In Working paper. Vienna: University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidheiny, K. (2012). Clustering in the linear model. In Short guides to micro-econometrics. Basel: University of Basel.Google Scholar
  17. Simonsohn, U., & Ariely, D. (2008). When rational sellers face nonrational buyers: evidence from herding on eBay. Management Science, 54(9), 1624–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilcox, R. T. (2000). Experts and amateurs: the role of experience in internet auctions. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yao, S., & Mela, C. F. (2008). Online auction demand. Marketing Science, 27(5), 861–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zeithammer, R. (2006). Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wen Cao
    • 1
  • Qinyang Sha
    • 2
  • Zhiyong Yao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dingwei Gu
    • 3
  • Xiang Shao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ManagementFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Megaputer IntelligenceBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.School of EconomicsFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations