Marine Geophysical Research

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 643–654 | Cite as

Variations of young oceanic intraplate seismic energy released with relation to lithosphere age. Implications in the East Pacific Rise and its convergence with the Rivera subduction zone

  • Nicolás PinzónEmail author
  • Carlos A. Vargas
Original Research Paper


We have estimated empirical relationships that associate the age of the Pacific oceanic lithosphere with the seismic energy released on both flanks of the East Pacific Rise. The equations found were tested by comparing other empirical equations based on lithospheric age, heat flow, and bathymetric depth published by other authors. The results of this study are consistent for seafloor ages ranging between 1 and 4 Ma throughout three perpendicular cross-sections. These cross-sections are located between the diverging plate boundary of the northern Pacific Ocean up to the subduction zone of western Mexico. Our results allow us to infer the depth of the 1200 °C isotherm underneath the analyzed plates, from the mid-oceanic ridges up to the subduction zones. The distribution of seismic energy released within the limits of the Rivera and Pacific plates shows a gradual decrease from the ridge axis to the oceanic trench. However, an increase of seismic activity is recorded near the Mesoamerican Trench, where the Rivera Plate subducts under the North American Plate at an angle of ~ 46°. This anomaly is a consequence of the convergence, thrust and deepening of the oceanic plate. Due to the homogeneity of this plate, it is possible to infer the projection of isochrones in the subduction zone. Although the thickening of the thermal boundary layer may be estimated from the square root function of the seismic energy, this brittle–ductile transition in the subduction zone deepens exponentially with relation to the computed energy.


Heat flow Seismic energy Brittle–ductile transition Mid-oceanic ridge Rivera plate subduction North American plate 



We thank the Geophysical Research Group of the Department of Geosciences, Universidad Nacional de Colombia at Bogotá, for supporting this work. We express our gratitude to USGS, ANSS, NOAA, and Global Heat Flow Group for providing datasets used in this paper. Advice, and useful comments were provided by Mario Andres Gutierrez.


  1. Abercrombie RE, Rice JR (2005) Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening? Geophys J Int 162:406–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auer L, Becker TW, Boschi L, Schmerr N (2015) Thermal structure, radial anisotropy, and dynamics of oceanic boundary layers. Geophys Res Lett 42:9740–9749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Båth M (1966) Earthquake energy and magnitude. Phys Chem Earth 7:115–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Debayle E, Ricard Y (2013) Seismic observations of large-scale deformation at the bottom of fast-moving plates. Earth Planet Sci Lett 376:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doucouré CM, Patriat P (1992) Thermal diffusivity of the lithosphere derived from altimetry and bathymetry profiles across the Southwest Indian Ridge. Geophys Res Lett 19(15):1543–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doucouré CM, de Wit MJ, Mushayandebvu MF (1996) Effective elastic thickness of the continental lithosphere in South Africa. J Geophys Res 101(B5):11291–11303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis TJG (1968) The detailed seismicity of Mid-Oceanic ridges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 4(1):39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Global Heat Flow Compilation Group (2013) Component parts of the world heat flow data collection. Pangaea. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammond WC, Toomey DR (2003) Seismic velocity anisotropy and heterogeneity beneath the Mantle Electromagnetic and Tomography Experiment (MELT) region of the East Pacific Rise from analysis of P and S body waves. J Geophys Res 108:2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasenclever J, Theissen-Krah S, Rüpke LH, Morgan JP, Iyer K, Petersen S, Devey CW (2014) Hybrid shallow on-axis and deep off-axis hydrothermal circulation at fast-spreading ridges. Nature 508(7497):508–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofstetter A, Shapira A (2000) Determination of earthquake energy release in the Eastern Mediterranean región. Geophys J Int 143(3):898–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isse T, Kawakatsu H, Yoshizawa K, Takeo A, Shiobara H, Sugioka H, Ito A, Suetsugu D, Reymond D (2019) Surface wave tomography for the Pacific Ocean incorporating seafloor seismic observations and plate thermal evolution. Earth Planet Sci Lett 510:116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Key K, Constable S, Liu L, Pommier A (2013) Electrical image of passive mantle upwelling beneath the northern East Pacific Rise. Nature 495:499–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lister CRB (1977) Estimators for heat flow and deep rock properties based on boundary layer theory. Tectonophysics 41(1–3):157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Menard HW (1960) The east pacific rise. Science 132(3441):1737–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moyer PA, Boettcher MS, McGuire JJ, Collins JA (2018) Spatial and temporal variations in earthquake stress drop on Gofar transform fault, East Pacific Rise: implications for fault strength. J Geophys Res 123(9):7722–7740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller RD, Sdrolias M, Gaina C, Roest WR (2008) Age, spreading rates and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9(4):Q04006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Niu Y, Green DH (2018) The petrological control on the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath ocean basins. Earth Sci Rev 185:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pardo M, Suárez G (1993) Steep subduction geometry of the Rivera Plate beneath the Jalisco Block in western Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 20(21):2391–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parker RL, Oldenburg DW (1973) Thermal model of ocean ridges. Nat Phys Sci 242(122):137–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons B, McKenzie D (1978) Mantle convection and the thermal structure of the plates. J Geophys Res 83(B9):4485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parsons B, Sclater JG (1977) An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age. J Geophys Res 82(5):803–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riedel C, Petersen T, Theilen F, Neben S (2003) High b-values in the leaky segment of the Tjörnes Fracture Zone north of Iceland: are they evidence for shallow magmatic heat sources? J Volcanol Geotherm Res 128(1–3):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rundquist DV, Sobolev PO (2002) Seismicity of mid-oceanic ridges and its geodynamic implications: a review. Earth Sci Rev 58(1–2):143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sclater JG, Jaupart C, Galson D (1980) The heat flow through oceanic and continental crust and the heat loss of the Earth. Rev Geophys 18(1):269–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapira A, Hofstetter A (1993) Source parameters and scaling relationships of earthquakes in Israel. Tectonophysics 217(3):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sibson RH (2011) The scope of earthquake geology. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 359(1):319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh SK, Ordaz M (1994) Seismic energy release in Mexican subduction zone earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(5):1533–1550Google Scholar
  29. Smith WHF, Sandwell DT (1997) Global seafloor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science 277(5334):1956–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stein CA, Stein S (1992) A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age. Nature 359(6391):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stein CA, Stein S (1994) Constraints on hydrothermal heat flux through the oceanic lithosphere from global heat flow. J Geophys Res 99(B2):3081–3095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sykes LR (1969) Seismicity of the mid-oceanic ridge system. In: Hart PJ (ed) The Earth’s crust and upper mantle. Geophysical Monograph, vol 13. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 148–153Google Scholar
  33. Turcotte DL, Schubert G (2012) Geodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Von Herzen RP, Uyeda S (1963) Heat flow through the Eastern Pacific ocean floor. J Geophys Res 68(14):4219–4250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismol Res Lett 72(3):373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolfson-Schwehr M, Boettcher MS, McGuire JJ, Collins JA (2014) The relationship between seismicity and fault structure on the Discovery transform fault, East Pacific Rise. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 15(9):3698–3712CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations