Advertisement

Leader character in board governance

  • Gerard Seijts
  • Alyson Byrne
  • Mary M. Crossan
  • Jeffrey Gandz
Article

Abstract

Despite the critical leadership role that corporate boards play in organizations, the character of their members has been neglected in research studies. We used a multi-method data collection approach to explore whether current directors in the public, private, and not-for-profit sectors believe that leader character plays an important role in board governance, particularly with regards to how boards make decisions, recruit new members, lead their organizations, and work together to perform their fiduciary and other responsibilities. Despite the perceived importance of leader character as reported by highly experienced corporate directors, we found that leader character is not commonly attended to in board conversations as a means to purposively improve the way boards operate. We outline practical implications of our findings as well as offer a call to action for future research on character in the context of board governance with the intent to improve governance in the public, private, and not-for-profit sectors and hence to foster sustained excellence in organizations.

Keywords

Leadership Character Boards Board effectiveness Board governance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (File: 435-2013-1889) awarded to the first, third and fourth authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Group & Organization Studies, 13, 468–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashford, S. J., & DeRue, D. S. (2012). Developing as a leader: The power of mindful engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 146–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: WH Freedman.Google Scholar
  4. Bednar, M. K., & Westphal, J. D. (2006). Surveying the corporate elite: Theoretical and practical guidance on improving response rates and response quality in top management survey questionnaires. In D. Ketchen & D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 3, pp. 37–56). Bingley: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennis, W. G., & Goldsmith, J. (2003). Learning to lead: A workbook on becoming a leader. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Corporate governance: What can we learn from public governance? Academy of Management Review, 32, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezemer, P. J., Nicholson, G., & Pugliese, A. (2014). Inside the boardroom: exploring board member interactions. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 11, 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bright, D. S., Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2006). The amplifying and buffering effects of virtuousness in downsized organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron, K., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1–24.Google Scholar
  12. Chizema, A., Kamuriwo, D. S., & Shinozawa, Y. (2015). Women on corporate boards around the world: Triggers and barriers. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 1051–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohan, J. A. (2002). “I didn’t know” and” I was only doing my job”: Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron’s information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 943–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conger, J., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2010). What is the character of research on leadership character? Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crête, R. (2016). The volkswagen scandal from the viewpoint of corporate governance. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crossan, M., Byrne, A., Seijts, G., Reno, M., Monzani, L., & Gandz, J. (2017). Toward a framework of leader character in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 986–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., Seijts, G., & Gandz, J. (2013). Developing leadership character in business programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crossan, M., Seijts, G., & Gandz, J. (2016). Developing leadership character. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of Management, 37, 404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deetz, S. A., Tracy, S. J., & Simpson, J. L. (2000). Leading organizations through transition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Du, Y., Deloof, M., & Jorissen, A. (2011). Active boards of directors in foreign subsidiaries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19, 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esser, J. K. (1998). Alive and well after 25 years: A review of groupthink research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 116–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1079–1108.Google Scholar
  27. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fried, V. H., Bruton, G. D., & Hisrich, R. D. (1998). Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furlong, W., Crossan, M., Gandz, J., & Crossan, L. (2017). Character’s essential role in addressing misconduct in financial institutions. Business Law International, 18, 199–223.Google Scholar
  31. Gandz, J., Crossan, M., Seijts, G., & Stephenson, C. (2010). Leadership on trial: A manifesto for leadership development. London, ON: The Richard Ivey School of Business.Google Scholar
  32. Gentry, W. A., Cullen, K. L., Sosik, J. J., Chun, J. U., Leupold, C. R., & Tonidandel, S. (2013). Integrity’s place among the character strengths of middle-level managers and top-level executives. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grahek, M. S., Thompson, A. D., & Toliver, A. (2010). The character to lead: A closer look at character in leadership. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62, 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hackett, R. D., & Wang, G. (2012). Virtues and leadership: An integrating conceptual framework founded in aristotelian and confucian perspectives on virtues. Management Decision, 50, 868–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. J. (2011). The locus of leader character. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 979–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hannah, S. T., & Jennings, P. L. (2013). Leader ethos and big-C character. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hannah, S. T., Sumanth, J. J., Lester, P., & Cavarretta, F. (2014). Debunking the false dichotomy of leadership idealism and pragmatism: Critical evaluation and support of newer genre leadership theories. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 598–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., Certo, S. T., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). What I like about you: A multilevel study of shareholder discontent with director monitoring. Organization Science, 22, 675–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Huse, M., Hoskisson, R., Zattoni, A., & Viganò, R. (2011). New perspectives on board research: Changing the research agenda. Journal of Management and Governance, 15, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. James, E. H., Wooten, L. P., & Dushek, K. (2011). Crisis management: Informing a new leadership research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 455–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  45. Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management, 39, 232–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Judge, W. Q., Jr., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 766–794.Google Scholar
  49. Kiel, F. (2015). Return on character: The real reason leaders and their companies win. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (2011). Corporate culture and performance. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  52. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lynall, M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mahadeo, J. D., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mardjono, A. (2005). A tale of corporate governance: Lessons why firms fail. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20, 272–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mazutis, D., & Zintel, C. (2015). Leadership and corporate responsibility: A review of the empirical evidence. Annals in Social Responsibility, 1, 76–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCauley, C. (1998). Group dynamics in Janis’s theory of groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. (1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Moore, G. (2005). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15, 659–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Hester, K. S. (2012). Background data: Use of experiential knowledge in personnel selection. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 353–382). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Nadler, D. A. (2004). Building better boards. Harvard Business Review, 82, 102–105.Google Scholar
  65. Nadler, D. A., Behan, B. A., & Nadler, M. B. (2006). Building better boards: A blueprint for effective governance. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2011). The wise leader. Harvard Business Review, 89, 58–67.Google Scholar
  67. O’Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., Chatman, J., & Doerr, B. (2015). The promise and problems of organizational culture: CEO personality, culture, and firm performance. Group and Organization Management, 39, 595–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Connor, M. A. (2002). The Enron board: The perils of groupthink. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 71, 1233–1320.Google Scholar
  69. Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2016). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1088–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Petrovic, J. (2008). Unlocking the role of a board director: A review of the literature. Management Decision, 46, 1373–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). The role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pinto, J. A. (2016). An examination of the evolution of governance. Banking & Finance Law Review, 31, 325–348.Google Scholar
  74. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2016). Annual corporate directors survey. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/corporate-governance/annual-corporate-directors-survey.html. Accessed November 5, 2017.
  75. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Quick, J. C., & Wright, T. A. (2011). Character-based leadership, context and consequences. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 984–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  78. Rhodes, C. (2016). Democratic business ethics: Volkswagen’s emissions scandal and the disruption of corporate sovereignty. Organization Studies, 37, 1501–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Salgado, J. F., Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection: An overview of constructs. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (pp. 165–199). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  81. Seijts, G. (2013). Good leaders learn: Lessons from lifetimes of leadership. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.Google Scholar
  82. Seijts, G., Crossan, M., & Carleton, E. (2017). Embedding leader character into HR practices to achieve sustained excellence. Organizational Dynamics, 46, 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Seijts, G., Gandz, J., Crossan, M., & Reno, M. (2015). Character matters: Character dimensions’ impact on leader performance and outcomes. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Seijts, G., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227–239.Google Scholar
  85. Sharfman, B. S., & Toll, S. J. (2008). Dysfunctional deference and board composition: Lessons from Enron. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, 103, 153–162.Google Scholar
  86. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sosik, J. J., Gentry, W. A., & Chun, J. U. (2012). The value of virtue in the upper echelons: A multisource examination of executive character strengths and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sturm, R., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. Leadership Quarterly, 28, 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (2013). A behavioral theory of corporate governance: Explicating the mechanisms of situated and socially constituted agency. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 607–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wright, T. A. (2015). Reflections on the role of character in business education and student leadership development. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wright, T. A., & Goodstein, J. (2007). Character is not “dead” in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33, 928–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wright, T. A., & Huang, C. C. (2008). Character in organizational research: Past directions and future prospects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 981–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zhu, D. H. (2013). Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 800–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerard Seijts
    • 1
  • Alyson Byrne
    • 2
  • Mary M. Crossan
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Gandz
    • 1
  1. 1.Western UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Memorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations