Group Prenatal Care Attendance and Women’s Characteristics Associated with Low Attendance: Results from Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE Study)
- 120 Downloads
Group prenatal care (GPC), an alternative to individual prenatal care (IPC), is becoming more prevalent. This study aimed to describe the attendance and reasons of low attendance among pregnant women who were randomly assigned to receive GPC or IPC and explore the maternal characteristics associated with low-attendance.
This study was a descriptive study among Medically low risk pregnant women (N = 992) who were enrolled in an ongoing prospective study. Women were randomly assigned to receive CenteringPregnany GPC (N = 498) or IPC (N = 994) in a single clinical site The attendance frequency and reason for low-attendance (i.e. ≤ 5/10 sessions in GPC or ≤ 5 visits in IPC) were described separately in GPC and IPC. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to explore the associations between maternal characteristics and low-attendance.
On average, women in GPC attended 5.32 (3.50) sessions, with only 6.67% attending all 10 sessions. Low-attendance rate was 34.25% in GPC and 10.09% in IPC. The primary reasons for low-attendance were scheduling barriers (23.19%) and not liking GPC (16.43%) in GPC but leaving the practice (34.04%) in IPC. In multivariable analysis, lower perceived family support (P = 0.01) was positively associated with low-attendance in GPC, while smoking in early pregnancy was negatively associated low-attendance (P = 0.02) in IPC.
Conclusions for Practice
Scheduling challenges and preference for non-group settings were the top reasons for low-attendance in GPC. Changes may need to be made to the current GPC model in order to add flexibility to accommodate women’s schedules and ensure adequate participation.
NCT02640638 Date Registered: 12/20/2015.
KeywordsPrenatal care Group prenatal care Pregnant women Low-attendance
We extend our gratitude to the study participants, research nurses, providers for their contributions.
EF: study conception and design, obtain data and statistical analysis, drafting the manuscript, major editing; MBJ: study conception and design, obtain data and analysis, drafting the manuscript, major editing; BW: obtain data and statistical analysis, editing; AC: major editing; SCK: major editing; SG: major editing; XS: major editing; LC: study conception and design, data obtain and statistical analysis, major editing; All authors: data collection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study is supported by National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), National Institutes of Health (NIH) through a 5-year Grant (R01HD082311). The funding body does not influence the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare that we have no competing interests.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2012). Guidelines for perinatal care (7th ed.). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Google Scholar
- Centering Healthcare Institute. (2018). CenteringPregnancy overview. Retrieved from https://www.centeringhealthcare.org/what-we-do/centering-pregnancy
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). PRAMS questionnaires. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/prams/Questionnaire.htm
- Chen, L., Crockett, A. H., Covington-Kolb, S., Heberlein, E., Zhang, L., & Sun, X. (2017). Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE study): Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of centeringpregnancy and birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1295-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, S. D., Lewis, J. B., Thomas, J. L., Grilo, S. A., & Ickovics, J. R. (2017). Expect with me: Development and evaluation design for an innovative model of group prenatal care to improve perinatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 17(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1327-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DIMES, M. o. (Producer). (2018). March of Dimes Supportive Pregnancy Care.Google Scholar
- Earnshaw, V. A., Rosenthal, L., Cunningham, S. D., Kershaw, T., Lewis, J., Rising, S. S., et al. (2016). Exploring group composition among young, urban women of color in prenatal care: Implications for satisfaction, engagement, and group attendance. Womens Health Issues, 26(1), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Economic Research Service. (2012). Six-item short form food security survey module. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/survey-tools.aspx
- Frew, P. M., Saint-Victor, D. S., Isaacs, M. B., Kim, S., Swamy, G. K., Sheffield, J. S., et al. (2014). Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: An overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 59(Suppl 7), S400–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gareau, S., Lopez-De Fede, A., Loudermilk, B. L., Cummings, T. H., Hardin, J. W., Picklesimer, A. H., et al. (2016). Group prenatal care results in medicaid savings with better outcomes: A propensity score analysis of CenteringPregnancy participation in South Carolina. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(7), 1384–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1935-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guardino, C. M., & Schetter, C. D. (2014). Understanding pregnancy anxiety: Concepts, correlates, and consequences. Zero to Three, 34(4), 12–21.Google Scholar
- Hahn-Holbrook, J., Dunkel Schetter, C., Arora, C., & Hobel, C. J. (2013). Placental corticotropin-releasing hormone mediates the association between prenatal social support and postpartum depression. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702612470646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heaman, M. I., Moffatt, M., Elliott, L., Sword, W., Helewa, M. E., Morris, H., et al. (2014). Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: A case–control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill, I., Dubay, L., Courtot, B., Benatar, S., Garrett, B., Blavin, F., et al. (2018). Strong start for mothers and newborns evaluation: Year 5 project synthesis, Technical report. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).Google Scholar
- Ickovics, J. R., Earnshaw, V., Lewis, J. B., Kershaw, T. S., Magriples, U., Stasko, E., et al. (2016). Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of group prenatal care: Perinatal outcomes among adolescents in New York City Health Centers. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ickovics, J. R., Kershaw, T. S., Westdahl, C., Rising, S. S., Klima, C., Reynolds, H., et al. (2003). Group prenatal care and preterm birth weight: Results from a matched cohort study at public clinics. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(5 Pt 1), 1051–1057.Google Scholar
- Jafari, F., Eftekhar, H., Fotouhi, A., Mohammad, K., & Hantoushzadeh, S. (2010). Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of group versus individual prenatal care: A new experience in Iran. Health Care for Women International, 31(7), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399331003646323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lobel, M. (1996). The revised pregnancy distress questionnaire (NUPDQ). Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
- Magriples, U., Boynton, M. H., Kershaw, T. S., Lewis, J., Rising, S. S., Tobin, J. N., et al. (2015). The impact of group prenatal care on pregnancy and postpartum weight trajectories. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213(5), 688.e681–688.e689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D., Hale, N., Blackhurst, D., & Covington-Kolb, S. (2012). The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(5), 415.e411–415.e417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Research, I. o. M. P. o. H. S., & Kessner, D. M. (1973). Infant death: An analysis by maternal risk and health care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Rising, S. S., Kennedy, H. P., & Klima, C. S. (2004). Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49(5), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2004.tb04433.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trotman, G., Chhatre, G., Darolia, R., Tefera, E., Damle, L., & Gomez-Lobo, V. (2015). The effect of centering pregnancy versus traditional prenatal care models on improved adolescent health behaviors in the perinatal period. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 28, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turner, R. J., Frankel, B. G., & Levin, D. M. (1983). Social support: Conceptualization, measurement, and implications for mental health. In J. R. Greenley (Ed.), Researching community and mental health (Vol. 3, pp. 67–111). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar