Effect of Modifiable Risk Factors on Preterm Birth: A Population Based-Cohort
Objectives The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, impact, and interaction of short interpregnancy interval (IPI), pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) category, and pregnancy weight gain (PWG) on the rate of preterm birth. Methods This is a population-based retrospective cohort study using vital statistics birth records from 2006 to 2011 in OH, US, analyzing singleton live births to multiparous mothers with recorded IPI (n = 393,441). Preterm birth rate at <37 weeks gestational age was compared between the referent pregnancy (defined as normal pre-pregnancy maternal BMI, IPI of 12–24 months, and Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended PWG) and those with short or long IPI, abnormal BMI (underweight, overweight, and obese), and high or low PWG (under or exceeding IOM recommendations). Results Only 6 % of the women in this study had a referent pregnancy, with a preterm birth rate of 7.6 % for this group. Short IPIs of <6 and 6–12 months were associated with increased rates of preterm birth rate to 12.9 and 10.4 %, respectively. Low PWG compared to IOM recommendations for pre-pregnancy BMI class was also associated with increased preterm birth rate of 13.2 % for all BMI classes combined. However, the highest rate of preterm birth of 25.2 % occurred in underweight women with short IPI and inadequate weight gain with adjOR 3.44 (95 % CI 2.80, 4.23). The fraction of preterm births observed in this cohort that can be attributed to short IPIs is 5.9 %, long IPIs is 8.3 %, inadequate PWG is 7.5 %, and low pre-pregnancy BMI is 2.2 %. Conclusions Our analysis indicates that a significant proportion of preterm births in Ohio are associated with potentially modifiable risk factors. These data suggest public health initiatives focused on preterm birth prevention could include counseling and interventions to optimize preconception health and prenatal nutrition.
KeywordsInterpregnancy interval Body mass index Pregnancy weight gain Preterm birth
This study includes data provided by the Ohio Department of Health which should not be considered an endorsement of this study or its conclusions.
This work was supported by the Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA, and March of Dimes, Grant 22-FY14-470 for the March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center Ohio, Collaborative, USA.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
- Chmitorz, A., von Kries, R., Rasmussen, K. M., Nehring, I., & Ensenauer, R. (2012). Do trimester-specific cutoffs predict whether women ultimately stay within the Institute of Medicine/National Research Council guidelines for gestational weight gain? Findings of a retrospective cohort study. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(6), 1432–1437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dietz, P. M., Bombard, J. M., Hutchings, Y. L., Gauthier, J. P., Gambatese, M. A., Ko, J. Y., et al. (2014). Validation of obstetric estimate of gestational age on US birth certificates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210(4), e331–e335. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hutcheon, J. A., Platt, R. W., Abrams, B., Himes, K. P., Simhan, H. N., & Bodnar, L. M. (2013). A weight-gain-for-gestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 97(5), 1062–1067. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.051706.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Landon, M. B., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E., Carpenter, M. W., Ramin, S. M., Casey, B., Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network, et al. (2009). A multicenter, randomized trial of treatment for mild gestational diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361(14), 1339–1348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McDonald, S. D., Han, Z., Mulla, S., Lutsiv, O., Lee, T., Beyene, J., & Knowledge Synthesis Group. (2011). High gestational weight gain and the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Canada, 33(12), 1223–1233. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22166276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rasmussen, K. M., Yaktine, A. L., Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council (2009). Weight gain during pregnancy: Reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar