When socio-political pressure is more powerful than the boss: workplace language policies by Kurds that restrict Kurdish
As interpretations of results from small-scale research sites are incomplete without consideration of the social structures that frame them (Block, in: Gardner, Martin-Jones (eds) Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography, Routledge, New York, 2012), the current study uses the theoretical lens of agency to examine the language policies of four of Istanbul’s Kurdish-owned eating establishments with respect to socio-political structures. Set in a context in which Turkish nationalist ideologies trickle down to long-standing and pervasive stigma toward Kurdish at local levels (Coşkun et al. in Scar of tongue: consequences of the ban of the use of mother tongue in education and experiences of Kurdish students in Turkey, DISA, Diyarbakır, 2011; Saraçoğlu in Kurds of modern Turkey: migration, neoliberalism, and exclusion in Turkish society, Tauris Academic Studies, New York, 2011; Polat in Crit Inq Lang Stud 8:261–288, 2011; Schluter and Sansarkan in Içduygu, Göker (eds), Rethinking migration and integration: bottom-up responses to neoliberal global challenges, The Isis Press, Istanbul, 2014), Kurdish workplaces represent rich sites for investigating the relative influence of differently scaled structures on individual free will. Based on ethnographic data collected through observations and interviews, the results, which align with Ortner’s (Anthropology and social theory: culture, power, and the acting subject, Duke University Press, Durham, 2006) and Archer’s (Being human: the problem of agency, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, Making our way through the world: human reflexivity and social mobility, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007) conceptualizations of agency, indicate that while structures severely constrain managers’ ability to determine policy, a small number of opportunities also exist to resist these structures. In contrast to much of the literature that emphasizes the dominance of global scales in the current neoliberal era (Cf. Heller in J Socioling 7(4):473–492, 2003; Blommaert in The sociolinguistics of globalization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010; Flubacher and Del Percio in Language, education and neoliberalism: critical studies in sociolinguistics, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, 2017; Lorente in Scripts of servitude: language, labor, migration, and transnational domestic work, Multilingual Matters, Bristol, 2017; Block in Political economy in sociolinguistics: neoliberalism, inequality and social class, Bloomsbury, London, 2018), nationally scaled structures feature most prominently. A center-periphery distinction emerges with respect to the magnitude of the nation’s influence over policy: peripherality, in agreement with Kelly-Holmes (in: Pietikäinen, Kelly-Holmes (eds) Multilingualism and the periphery, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013) and Hiss (Lang Soc 46:697–718, 2017), comes with diminished pressure to adhere to the norms of the center. These findings both underline the considerable power of Turkish national structures over individuals in this setting while indicating a small space for alternative marketplaces (Woolard in Am Ethnol 12:738–748, 1985).
KeywordsAgency Kurdish Blue-collar workplace Periphery
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author claims no conflict of interest.
- Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Block, D. (2012). Unpicking agency in sociolinguistic research with migrants. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography (pp. 47–60). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Block, D. (2018). Political economy in sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality and social class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: l’économie des échanges linguistiques. [What speaking means: The economy of linguistic exchanges] Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
- Coşkun, V., Derince, M. Ş., & Uçarlar, N. (2011). Scar of tongue: consequences of the ban of the use of mother tongue in education and experiences of Kurdish students in Turkey. Diyarbakır: DISA.Google Scholar
- Flubacher, M.-C., & Del Percio, A. (Eds.). (2017). Language, education and neoliberalism: Critical studies in sociolinguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Center.Google Scholar
- Hult, F. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.Google Scholar
- Kelly-Holmes, H. (2013). Translation in progress: Centralizing and peripheralizing tensions in the practices of commercial actors in minority language sites. In S. Pietikäinen & H. Kelly-Holmes (Eds.), Multilingualism and the periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Li, W. (2012). Introduction to Part I: Linking local practices to wider social processes. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography (pp. 19–23). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lorente, B. P. (2017). Scripts of servitude: Language, labor, migration, and transnational domestic work. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Radikal. (2011). Caz festivalinde Kürtçe şarkı söyleyen Aynur yuhalandı [Kurdish singing Aynur brought down at the Jazz Festival]. 16 July. http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/caz-festivalinde-kurtce-sarki-soyleyen-aynur-yuhalandi-1056494/. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.
- Radikal. (2014). Kürtçe konuştuğu için’ 10 saniyede linç edilmiş!. [Lynched in ten seconds for speaking Kurdish!]. 13 November. http://www.radikal.com.tr/turkiye/kurtce-konustugu-icin-10-saniyede-linc-edilmis-1229771/. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
- Sakr, N. (2002). Satellite realms: Transnational television, globalization, and the Middle East. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
- Saraçoğlu, C. (2011). Kurds of modern Turkey: Migration, neoliberalism, and exclusion in Turkish society. New York, NY: Tauris Academic Studies.Google Scholar
- Schluter, A., & Sansarkan, M. (2014). Language choice as a function of power and solidarity in the Istanbul workplace. In A. Içduygu & Z. G. Göker (Eds.), Rethinking migration and integration: Bottom-up responses to neoliberal global challenges (pp. 127–175). Istanbul: The Isis Press.Google Scholar
- Turgut, T. A. (2015). Telefonda Kürtçe konuşuyor’ diye öldürüldü [Killed when he said he was speaking Kurdish on the phone] 7 July. Evrensel News. https://www.evrensel.net/haber/260129/telefonda-kurtce-konusuyor-diye-olduruldu. Accessed 28 Mar 2017.
- Umut Gazetesi. (2015). Kürtçe şarkı söylediği için öldürüldü, emniyet yalanlıyor [Killed for singing in Kurdish, Police lie], 25 October. http://umutgazetesi2.org/kurtce-sarki-soyledigi-icin-olduruldu-emniyet-yalanliyor/. Accessed 25 Mar 2017.
- Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar