Advertisement

Detached implementation: Discourse and practice in minority language use in Romania

  • Tibor ToróEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The paper focuses on minority language policy implementation in Romania. Although the policy framework of minority language use is considered quite satisfying by many authors, a deeper analysis reveals significant problems in the implementation of these policies. Based on implementation research, the paper reveals the hidden mechanism of language policy in Romania. First, it presents evidence that without clear guidelines and tools for accountability, state authorities leave room for negotiation, and municipalities can choose whether they want to implement minority language use provisions or not. Second, rather counterintuitively, in many cases Hungarian settlements do not implement it either. All explanations point toward the fact that Hungarian political elites fail to create public pressure to force implementation, thus they choose to keep claims regarding minority language use in the symbolic and political realm. Moreover, it argues that policy implementation is not always a necessary condition for successful claim making, as the two domains are not always linked by the public. Also, it underlines the importance of micro-level analysis in the case of minority language policies, which can be achieved by putting more focus on implementation research, instead of legal and policy-based macro-analysis.

Keywords

Romania Hungarian language Language policy implementation Minority language rights Language ideology 

References

  1. Arzoz, X. (2007). The nature of language rights. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 6(2), 1–35.Google Scholar
  2. Arzoz, X. (2010). Accommodating linguistic difference: Five normative models of language rights. European Constitutional Law Review, 6(01), 102–122.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019610100066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bárdi, N. (2013). Otthon és haza: Tanulmányok a romániai magyar kisebbség történetérol. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  4. Bogdán, A., & Mohácsek, M. (2009). A nemzeti kisebbségek problémakörében illetékes közintézmények Romániában és a kisebbségi nyelvhasználat a közigazgatásban. Regio, 20(2), 47–68.Google Scholar
  5. Boia, L. (1997). Istorie şi mit în conştiinţa românească. Bucureşti: Humanitas.Google Scholar
  6. Călușer, M. (2009). Carta europeană a limbilor regionale sau minoritare în România. Între norme şi practici. Cluj: CRDE.Google Scholar
  7. Csergő, Zs. (2007). Talk of the nation: Language and conflict in Romania and Slovakia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gilberg, T. (1990). Nationalism and communism in Romania: The rise and fall of Ceausescu’s personal dictatorship. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Grin, F. (2003). Language policy evaluation and the European charter for regional or minority languages. Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, N.Y: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horváth, I. (2002). Facilitating conflict transformation: Implementation of the recommendations of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities to Romania, 19932001 (Working Paper). Hamburg: CORE.Google Scholar
  11. Horváth, I. (2008). A romániai nyelvpolitikák értékelése. Magyar Kisebbség, 13(3–4), 263–277.Google Scholar
  12. Horváth, I. (2009a). Application of the of the Romanian law on national minority rights (database). Romanian Institute for Research on National Minorities. Cluj-Napoca. http://www.adatbank.ro/ispmn/uj/?oldal=adatlap%7C22. Accessed 19 July 2017.
  13. Horváth, I. (2009b). Kisebbségi nyelvi jogok és kisebbségi nyelvhasználat Romániában. Magyar Kisebbség, 14(1–2), 208–220.Google Scholar
  14. Kiss, T. (2017). Beyond the ethnic vote: Shifting determinants of the electoral behavior of Transylvanian Hungarians. Problems of Post-Communism.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1336422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiss, T., & Székely, I. G. (2016). Shifting linkages in ethnic mobilization: The case of RMDSZ and the Hungarians in Transylvania. Nationalities Papers, 44(4), 591–610.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1149157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemke, T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3), 49–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Livezeanu, I. (1995). Cultural politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, nation building & ethnic struggle, 1918–1930. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Markó, B. (2008). Egy elmaradt egyezség története. Élet és Irodalom, LII(38).Google Scholar
  19. May, S. (2003). Language, nationalism and democracy in Europe. In G. Hogan-Brun & S. Wolff (Eds.), Minority languages in Europe: Frameworks, status, prospects (pp. 211–232). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. May, S. (2005). Language rights: Moving the debate forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 319–347.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00295.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. May, S. (2006). Language Policy and Minority Rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 255–272). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  22. May, S. (2014). Language rights and language policy: Addressing the gap(s) between principles and practices. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(4), 355–359.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.979649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, H. (2002). Who will guard the guardians themselves? National interest versus factional corruption in policymaking for ESL in Australia. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 111–136). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Namyalo, S., & Nakayiza, J. (2014). Dilemmas in implementing language rights in multilingual Uganda. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(4), 409–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.987425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ó Flatharta, P. (2015). Language schemes—A useful policy tool for language planning? Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(4), 378–391.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.979648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pennycook, A. (1998). The right to language: Towards a situated ethics of language possibilities. Language Sciences, 20(1), 73–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(97)00013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pennycook, A. (2002a). Language policy and docile bodies: Hong Kong and Governmentality. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 91–110). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Pennycook, A. (2002b). Mother tongues, governmentality, and protectionism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2002.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pennycook, A. (2006). Postmodernism in Language Policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 60–76). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  31. Ram, M. H. (2003). Democratization through European integration: The case of minority rights in the Czech Republic and Romania. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(2), 28–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02686267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rassool, N. (1998). Postmodernity, cultural pluralism and the nation-state: Problems of language rights, human rights, identity and power. Language Sciences, 20(1), 89–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(97)00014-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2006). An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, N. S. (1996). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. S. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Salat, L. (2015). Az RMDSZ 25 éve—A célok tükrében. Magyar Kisebbség, 20(1–2), 9–29.Google Scholar
  36. Salat, L., & Novák, Cs. Z. (2015). Ethnicity, Nationalism, and the Minority Regime. In L. Stan & D. Vancea (Eds.), Post-communist Romania at twenty-five: Linking past, present, and future (pp. 63–86). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  37. Schwellnus, G. (2004). Looking back at ten years of EU minority conditionality vis-à-vis Central and Eastern European Candidate States. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 4, 321–340.Google Scholar
  38. Shohamy, E. G. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sterk, R. (2011). Between paper and practice: The gap between legislation and actual implementation: The Frisian case. Europäisches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 4(2), 103–115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12241-011-0010-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas, J. W., & Grindle, M. S. (1990). After the decision: Implementing policy reforms in developing countries. World Development, 18(8), 1163–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(90)90096-g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Introduction: Critical issues in educational language policy. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 3–16). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
  44. Toró, T. (2016a). Egy helyben topogva? Kisebbségi nyelvi jogok alakulása Romániában 2008 és 2015 között. Magyar Kisebbség, 21(2), 18–53.Google Scholar
  45. Toró, T. (2016b). Hungarian minority politics in post-socialist Romania: Interests, strategies, and discourses. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2016-0022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vass, Á. (2015). If yes, why not? minority language use and accommodation of minority language rights in Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 8(1), 43–56.  https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2015-0012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verdery, K. (1991). National ideology under socialism: Identity and cultural politics in Ceauşescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Veress, E. (2006). Nyelvhasználati jogok a román közigazgatásban. Romániai Magyar Jogtudományi, Közlöny(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  49. Vincze, G. (1998). A romániai magyar kisebbség oktatásügye 1944 és 1989 között. III. rész: 1965-1989. Magyar Kisebbség, 4(1), 289–317.Google Scholar
  50. Wise, M. (2007). Putting principles of linguistic rights into practice: Geographical perspectives on a contemporary European problem. Geoforum, 38(1), 171–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolff, S., & Cordell, K. (2003). Ethnic Germans as a language minority in central and Eastern Europe: Legislative and policy frameworks in Poland, Hungary and Romania. In G. Hogan-Brun & S. Wolff (Eds.), Minority languages in Europe: Frameworks, status, prospects (pp. 99–119). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Relations and European StudiesSapientia Hungarian University of TransylvaniaCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations