Normalization of Epigenetic Change in the Genome by Peptide Bioregulator (Ala–Glu–Asp–Gly) in Pulmonary Tuberculosis

  • Teimuraz Lezhava
  • Tamar Buadze
  • Tinatin Jokhadze
  • Jamlet Monaselidze
  • Maia Gaiozishvili
  • Ketevan Rubanovi
  • Nana Kiria
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic and epigenetic variation of the genome in patients with sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis (PT) before and after treatment, under the effect of peptide bioregulator—Ala–Glu–Asp–Gly. In lymphocyte cultures from patients with sensitive primary PT were studied: total heterochromatin with differential scanning calorimeter; facultative heterochromatin (sister chromatid exchanges) with 5-bromdeoxyuridin and mutation (chromosome aberrations). We determined: there was an epigenetic alteration of functional parameters of the genome in PT before treatment. The level of heterochromatin decreased in the telomeric regions of chromosomes (in control it was high) and increased in the middle regions of chromosomes (in control it was reduced); there was a high level of somatic recombination; revealed an increase of the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations. Has been revealed the ability of bioregulator (Ala–Glu–Asp–Gly) to normalize the altered genomic parameters in patients with PT. The results obtained in the study, which testify to the specific epigenetic variability of the genome in patients with the sensitive form of PT, in particular—the redistribution of heterochromatin from telomere to the medial regions of chromosome arms, high level of somatic recombination and increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations, can contribute to the early detection of PT, and also a bioregulator—Ala–Glu–Asp–Gly can be used to determine the effectiveness of the treatment and used to develop new therapies.

Keywords

Pulmonary tuberculosis bioregulator—Ala–Glu–Asp–Gly Heterochromatinization Mutation Telomere 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is dedicated to the memory of Professor A.A. Prokofieva-Belgovskaya from her grateful students.

Author Contributions

TL carried out the study and drafted the manuscript with TJ and JM. TB and MG were responsible for lymphocyte cultures and took part in the design of the study. NK and KR were responsible for the material collection parts. All authors were involved in finalizing the manuscript and read and approved the submitted version.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Teimuraz Lezhava, Tamar Buadze, Tinatin Jokhadze, Jamlet Monaselidze, Maia Gaiozishvili, Ketevan Rubanovi and Nana Kiria confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

Samples of peripheral blood were obtained from healthy individuals and from individuals with PT, after and before treatment. Biological material (peripheral blood) was collected out in accordance with international requirements, Research object-isolated lymphocytes for cultivation (in vitro). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain studies with animal subjects.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bolzan A (2012) Chromosomal aberrations involving telomeres and interstitial telomeric sequences. Mutagenesis 27:1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Canzio D, Liao M, Naber N et al (2013) A conformational switch in HP1releases auto-inhibition to drive heterochromatin assembly. Nature 496:377–381CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardellini E, Cinelli S, Gianfranceschi G et al (2000) Differential scanning calorimetry of chromatin at different level of condensation. Mol Biol Rep 27:175–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiacchiera F, Piunti A, Pasini D (2013) Epigenetic methylations and their connections with metabolism. Cell Mol Life Sci 70:1495–1508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dialynas G, Vitalini M, Wallrath L (2008) Linking heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) to cancer progression. Mutat Res 647:13–28CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Esterhuyse M, Linhart H, Kaufmann S (2012) Can the battle against tuberculosis gain from epigenetic research? Trends Microbiol 20:220–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haluskova J (2009) Epigenetic studies in human diseases. Folia Biol 56:83–96Google Scholar
  8. Hawley R, Arbel T (1993) Yeast genetics and the fall of classical view of meiosis. Cell 72:301–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellen T, Kluz T, Harder M et al (2009) Heterochromatinization as a potential mechanism of nickel induced carcinogenesis. Biochemistry 48:4626–4632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoo J, Parslow I (1979) Relation between the SCE points and the DNA replication bands. Chromosoma 71:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ISCN (1985) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  12. Khavinson V, Lezhava T, Monaselidze J (2003) PeptideEpitalon activates chromatin at the old age. Neuroendocrinol Lett 24:329–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Khavinson V, Kuznik B, Ryzhak G (2014) Peptide bioregulators: a new class of geroprotectors, report 2. The results of clinical trials. Adv Gerontol 4:346–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128:693–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazutka I (1990) Sister chromatid exchanges in the cells of higher eukaryotes. Tsitologiia 32:977–984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lehner B, Sandner B, Marschallinger J et al (2011) The dark side of BRdU in neural stem cell biology detrimental effects on cell cycle differentiation and survival. Cell Tissue Res 345:313–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lezhava T (2001) Chromosome and aging: genetic conception of aging. Biogerontology 2:253–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lezhava T (2006) Human chromosomes and aging from 80 to 114 years. Nova Biomedical, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Lezhava T, Monaselidze J, Jokhadze T et al (2011a) Gerontology research in Georgia. Biogerontology 12:87–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lezhava T, Monaselidze J, Jokhadze T et al (2011b) Remodeling of heterochromatin induced by heavy metals in extreme old age. Age (Dordrecht) 33:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lezhava T, Monaselidze J, Jokhadze T et al (2015) Epigenetic regulation of “age” heterochromatin by peptide bioregulator cortagen. Int J Pept Res Ther 21:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li E, Zhang Y (2014) DNA methylation in mammals. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazin A (2009) Suicidal function of DNA methylation in age-related genome disintegration. Ageing Res Rev 8:314–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moller M, de Wit E, Hoal E (2010) Past, presen and future directions in human genetic susceptibility to tuberculosis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 58:3–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Monaselidze J, Abuladze M, Asatiani N (2006) Characterization of chromium-induced apoptosis in cultured mammalian cells. A different scanning calorimetry study. Thermochem Acta 441:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moroz V, Smirnova S, Ivanova O et al (2007) Mutations and antimutagens in emergency medicine. Obshaya Reanimatol 111:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Novitskiĭ V, Strelis A, Urazova O (2005) The cytogenic status of peripheral lymphocytes in pulmonary tuberculosis before and during chemotherapy. ProblTuberkBoleznLegk 5:43–46Google Scholar
  28. Prokofieva-Belgovskaya A (1986) Heterochromatin regions of chromosomes. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  29. Qu H, Fisher-Hoch S, McCormick J (2011) Knowledge gaining by human genetic studies on tuberculosis susceptibility. J Hum Genet 56:177–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Reiner S (2005) Epigenetic control in the immune response. Hum Mol Genet 14:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rudd M, Friedman C, Parghi S et al (2007) elevated rates of sister chromatid exchange at chromosome ends. PLoS Genet 3:e32.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0030032 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sperling K, Wegner R, Riehm H et al (1975) Frequency and distribution of sister-chromatid exchanges in a case of Fanconi’s anemia. Humangenetik 27:227–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Thye T, Vannberg F, Wong S et al (2010) Genome wide association analyses. Identifiesasusceptibility for tuberculosis on chromosome 18q11.2. Nature 2:739–741Google Scholar
  34. WHO (2014) Global tuberculosis report 2014. World Health Organization, Geneva. Accessed 29 June 2015Google Scholar
  35. Wilson C, Rowell E, Sekimata M (2009) Epigenetic control of T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol 9:91–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teimuraz Lezhava
    • 1
  • Tamar Buadze
    • 1
  • Tinatin Jokhadze
    • 1
  • Jamlet Monaselidze
    • 2
  • Maia Gaiozishvili
    • 1
  • Ketevan Rubanovi
    • 3
  • Nana Kiria
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsIvane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  2. 2.Laboratory of Physics, E. Andronikashvili Institute of PhysicsIvane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  3. 3.Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  4. 4.National Center of Tuberculosis and Lung DiseasesTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations