What’s wrong with truth-conditional accounts of slurs
The aim of this paper is to provide arguments based on linguistic evidence that discard a truth-conditional analysis of slurs (TCA) and pave the way for more promising approaches. We consider Hom and May’s version of TCA, according to which the derogatory content of slurs is part of their truth-conditional meaning such that, when slurs are embedded under semantic operators such as negation, there is no derogatory content that projects out of the embedding. In order to support this view, Hom and May make two moves: (1) they point to cases where it looks like projection does not occur and (2) they try to explain away cases where projection seems to occur by appealing to a pragmatic phenomenon that they call ‘offense’. Pace Hom and May, we argue that the derogatory content of slurs does in fact project and, in advocating for our claim, (1) we show that those cases where it looks like projection does not occur are in fact metalinguistic uses in which slurs are not really used, by relying on three linguistic tests (Sect. 3); and (2) we refute Hom and May’s attempt to explain why speakers would entertain the supposedly wrong intuition that the derogatory content of slurs projects out of semantic embedding, by focusing on the case of slurs for fictional entities (Sect. 4). We conclude that Hom and May’s strategies to support TCA ultimately fail.
KeywordsSlurs Truth-conditional account Projection Metalinguistic negation Fictional slurs Expressives
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We would like to thank Esa Diaz-Leon, Paul Egré, Michael Murez, Mihaela Popa-Wyatt and Philippe Schlenker for their suggestions. Claudia Bianchi, Max Kölbel, Robert May, François Recanati, Benjamin Spector and Isidora Stojanovic deserve special mention for their insightful comments on earlier versions of the paper. Many thanks to the participants of the ‘Names, demonstratives and expressives’ conference (Gargnano, September 2014), the ‘8th Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy’ conference (Milan, June 2015), the ‘2nd ECOM Workshop’ (Uconn, November 2015), the ‘The Methods of Philosophy’ conference (Milan, October 2017) for their insights and feedback. This paper was fully collaborative; the order of the authors' names is arbitrary. This work was supported in part by the Labex and Idex grants: ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*. Bianca Cepollaro also thanks the project PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014 (in particular BI-Mestre-PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014 and PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014-SEM).
- Anderson, L., & Lepore, E. (2013). Slurring words. Nous, 47(1), 25–48.Google Scholar
- Bianchi, C. (2014b). The speech acts account of derogatory epithets: Some critical notes. In Dutant, J., Fassio D., & Meylan A. (Eds.), Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel. Université de Genève (pp. 465–480). https://www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/publications/engel/liberamicorum/LiberAmicorum_PascalEngel.pdf.
- Bianchi, C. (2018). Slurs and perspectives. In Preyer, G. (Ed.) Beyond semantics and pragmatics (pp. 187–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Brontsema, R. (2004). A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 17, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Camp, E. (2018). A dual act analysis of slurs. In D. Sosa (Ed.), Bad words (pp. 29–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cepollaro, B. (2016). Building evaluation into language. Phenomenology and Mind, 11, 158–168.Google Scholar
- Cepollaro, B. (2017b). The semantics and pragmatics of slurs and thick terms. Ph.D. dissertation, PSL Research University, Paris.Google Scholar
- Copp, D. (2009). Realist-expressivism and conventional implicature. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 4, 167–202.Google Scholar
- Croom, A. (2014). Spanish slurs and stereotypes for Mexican–Americans in the USA: A context-sensitive account of derogation and appropriation. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 2, 1–35.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. A., & Potts, C. (2009b). Predicting perspectival orientation for appositives. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 45(1), 207–221.Google Scholar
- Hom, C., & May, R. (2018). Pejoratives as fiction. In D. Sosa (Ed.), Bad words (pp. 108–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Jeshion, R. (2016). Slur creation, bigotry formation: The power of expressivism. Phenomenology and Mind, 11, 130–139.Google Scholar
- Jeshion, R. (2018). Slurs, dehumanization, and the expression of contempt. In D. Sosa (Ed.), Bad words (pp. 77–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kukla, R. (2018). Slurs, interpellation, and ideology. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56(Spindel Supplement), 1–26.Google Scholar
- Langton, R. (2012). Beyond belief: Pragmatics in hate speech and pornography. In M. K. McGowan & I. Maitra (Eds.), Speech and harm: Controversies over free speech (pp. 72–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Langton, R., Haslanger, S., & Anderson, L. (2012). Language and race. In G. Russell & D. Graff Fara (Eds.), Routledge companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 753–767). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Macià, J. (2002). Presuposición y significado expressivo. Theoria: Revista de Teoria Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 3(45), 499–513.Google Scholar
- Macià, J. (2006). Context, presupposition and expressive meaning. Handout for Milan Meeting 2006, Milan.Google Scholar
- Macià, J. (2011). A defense of the presuppositional view of expressive meaning. Milan: Handout for ECAP-7.Google Scholar
- Marques, T. (2017). Pejorative discourse is not fictional. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 6(4), 250–260.Google Scholar
- McCready, E. (2010). Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3(8), 1–57.Google Scholar
- Miščević, N. (2011). Slurs & thick concepts-Is the new expressivism tenable. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 11(32), 159–182.Google Scholar
- Nunberg, G. (2018). The social life of slurs. In D. Fogal, D. Harris, & M. Moss (Eds.), New work on speech acts (pp. 237–295). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Potts, C. (2007). The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics, 33(2), 165–197.Google Scholar
- Rappaport, J. (forthcoming). Communicating with slurs. Philosophical Quarterly.Google Scholar
- Richard, M. (2008). When truth gives out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thommen, T. (2017). Are expressives presuppositional? In K. Lohiniva, & J. Wahle (Eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLI 2017 Student Session (pp. 185–195). http://www2.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/esslli-stus-2017/pre proceedings_stus_2017.pdf.
- Thommen, T. (2018). Slurs in speech and thought. Psychology. Ph.D. dissertation, PSL Research University, Paris.Google Scholar
- Väyrynen, P. (2013). The lewd, the rude and the nasty—A study of thick concepts in ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar