A Bayesian approach for semiparametric regression analysis of panel count data

  • Jianhong Wang
  • Xiaoyan LinEmail author


Panel count data commonly arise in epidemiological, social science, and medical studies, in which subjects have repeated measurements on the recurrent events of interest at different observation times. Since the subjects are not under continuous monitoring, the exact times of those recurrent events are not observed but the counts of such events within the adjacent observation times are known. A Bayesian semiparametric approach is proposed for analyzing panel count data under the proportional mean model. Specifically, a nonhomogeneous Poisson process is assumed to model the panel count response over time, and the baseline mean function is approximated by monotone I-splines of Ramsay (Stat Sci 3:425–461, 1988). Our approach allows to estimate the regression parameters and the baseline mean function jointly. The proposed Gibbs sampler is computationally efficient and easy to implement because all of the full conditional distributions either have closed form or are log-concave. Extensive simulations are conducted to evaluate the proposed method and to compare with two other bench methods. The proposed approach is also illustrated by an application to a famous bladder tumor data set (Byar, in: Pavone-Macaluso M, Smith PH, Edsmyn F (eds) Bladder tumors and other topics in urological oncology. Plenum, New York, 1980).


Monotone splines Nonhomogeneous Poisson process Panel count data Proportional mean model Semiparametric regression 


Supplementary material

10985_2019_9471_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (368 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 368 KB)


  1. Balshaw RF, Dean CB (2002) A semiparametric model for the analysis of recurrent-event panel data. Biometrics 58:324–331MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Byar DP (1980) The veterans administration study of chemoprophylaxis for recurrent stage I bladder tumors: comparisons of placebo, pyridoxine, and topical thiotepa. In: Pavone-Macaluso M, Smith PH, Edsmyn F (eds) Bladder tumors and other topics in urological oncology. Plenum, New York, pp 363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai B, Lin X, Wang L (2011) Bayesian proportional hazards model for current status data with monotone splines. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:2644–2651MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chib S, Greenbergb E, Winkelmann R (1998) Posterior simulation and Bayes factors in panel count data models. J Econom 86:33–54CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelfand AE, Smith AFM (1990) Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85:398–409MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxiation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 6:721–741CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilks W, Wild P (1992) Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Appl Stat 41:337–348CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Hua L, Zhang Y (2011) Spline-based semiparametric projected generalized estimating equation method for panel count data. Biostatistics 13:440–454CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang CY, Wang MC, Zhang Y (2006) Analysing panel count data with informative observation times. Biometrika 93:763–775MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ibrahim JG, Chen MH, Sinha D (2001) Bayesian survival analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin X, Cai B, Wang L, Zhang Z (2015) A Bayesian proportional hazards model for general interval-censored data. Lifetime Data Anal 21:470–490MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Lu M, Zhang Y, Huang J (2009) Semiparametric estimation methods for panel count data using monotone B-splines. J Am Stat Assoc 104:1060–1070MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu M, Zhang Y, Huang J (2007) Estimation of the mean function with panel count data using monotone polynomial splines. Biometrika 94:705–718MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Park T, Casella G (2008) The Bayesian Lasso. J Am Stat Assoc 103:681–686MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramsay J (1988) Monotone regression splines in action. Stat Sci 3:425–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schumaker LL (1981) Spline functions basic theory. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Sinha D, Maiti T (2004) A Bayesian approach for the analysis of panel-count data with dependent termination. Biometrics 60:34–40MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Spiegelhalter D, Best NG, Carlin BP, Linde AVD (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc B 64:583–639MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Sun J, Kalbfleisch JD (1995) Estimation of the mean function of point processes based on panel count data. Stat Sin 5:279–89MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun J, Wei LJ (2000) Regression analysis of panel count data with covariate-dependent observation and censoring times. R Stat Soc B 62:293–302MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun J, Zhao X (2013) Statistical analysis of panel count data. Stat Biol Health 80Google Scholar
  22. Wellner JA, Zhang Y (2000) Two estimators of the mean of a counting process with panel count data. Ann Stat 28:779–814MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Wellner JA, Zhang Y (2007) Two likelihood-based semiparametric estimation methods for panel count data with covariates. Ann Stat 35:2106–2142MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu Y, Jiang XQ, Kim J, Ohno-Machado L (2012) I-spline smoothing for calibrating predictive models. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc 2012:39–46Google Scholar
  25. Wang L, Dunson DB (2011) Semiparametric Bayes’ proportional odds models for current status data with underreporting. Biometrics 67:1111–1118MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang X, Ma S, Yan J (2013) Augmented estimating equations for semiparametric panel count regression with informative observation times and censoring time. Stat Sin 23:359–381MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang Y, Jamshidian M (2004) On algorithms for npmle of the failure function with censored data. J Comput Graph Stat 13:123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations