Advertisement

Multiplicative rates model for recurrent events in case-cohort studies

  • Poulami Maitra
  • Leila D. A. F. Amorim
  • Jianwen CaiEmail author
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

In large prospective cohort studies, accumulation of covariate information and follow-up data make up the majority of the cost involved in the study. This might lead to the study being infeasible when there are some expensive variables and/or the event is rare. Prentice (Biometrika 73(1):1–11, 1986) proposed the case-cohort study for time to event data to tackle this problem. There has been extensive research on the analysis of univariate and clustered failure time data, where the clusters are formed among different individuals under case-cohort sampling scheme. However, recurrent event data are quite common in biomedical and public health research. In this paper, we propose case-cohort sampling schemes for recurrent events. We consider a multiplicative rates model for the recurrent events and propose a weighted estimating equations approach for parameter estimation. We show that the estimators are consistent and asymptotically normally distributed. The proposed estimator performed well in finite samples in our simulation studies. For illustration purposes, we examined the association between prior occurrence of measles on acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRI) among young children in Brazil.

Keywords

Generalized case-cohort design Recurrent events Correlated data Acute lower respiratory tract infections 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Editor, Associate Editor and reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions that have improved the paper. This research was partially supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P01CA142538 and P30ES010126).

References

  1. Amorim LD, Cai J (2015) Modelling recurrent events : a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 44(1):324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen PK, Gill RD (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann Stat 10(4):1110–1120MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow WE (1994) Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. Biometrics 50(4):1064–1072CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Barreto ML, Farenzena GG, Fiaccone RL, Santos LMP, Assis AMO, Araujo MPN, Santos PAB (1994) Effect of vitamin a supplementation on diarrhoea and acute lower-respiratory-tract infections in young children in brazil. Lancet 344:228–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgan O, Goldstein L, Langholz B (1995) Methods for the analysis of sampled cohort data in the cox proportional hazards model. Ann Stat 23(5):1749–1778MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgan O, Langholz B, Samuelson S, Goldstein L, Pogoda J (2000) Exposure stratified case-cohort designs. Lifetime Data Anal 6:39–58MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Breslow NE, Wellner JA (2006) Weighted likelihood for semiparametric models and two-phase stratified samples, with application to cox regression. Scand J Stat 34:86–102MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen F, Chen K (2014) Case-cohort analysis of clusters of recurrent events. Lifetime Data Anal 20:1–15MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen K (2001) Generalized case-cohort sampling. J R Stat Soc Ser B 63(4):791–809MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook RJ, Lawless JF, Lakhal-Chaieb L, Lee KA (2009) Robust estimation of mean functions and treatment effects for recurrent events under event-dependent censoring and termination: application to skeletal complications in cancer metastatic to bone. J Am Stat Assoc 104:60–75MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Foutz RV (1977) On the unique consistent solution to the likelihood equations. J Am Stat Assoc 72(357):147–148MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang Y, Chen YQ (2003) Marginal regression of gaps between recurrent events. Lifetime Data Anal 9:293–303MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Jahn-Eimermacher A, Ingel K, Ozga AK, Preussler S, Binder H (2015) Simulating recurrent event data with hazard functions defined on a total time scale. BMC Med Res Methodol 15(1):16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalbfleisch JD, Lawless JF (1988) Likelihood analysis of multi-state models for disease incidence and mortality. Stat Med 7:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang S, Cai J (2009a) Marginal hazards model for case-cohort studies with multiple disease outcomes. Biometrika 96(4):887–901MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Kang S, Cai J (2009b) Marginal hazards regression for retrospective studies within cohort with possibly correlated failure time data. Biometrics 65:405–414MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Karatzas I, Shereve SE (1988) Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kulich M, Lin D (2004) Improving the efficiency of relative-risk estimation in case-cohort studies. J Am Stat Assoc 99(467):832–844MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawless JF, Nadeau C (1995) Some simple robust methods for the analysis of recurrent events. Technometrics 37(2):158–168MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin DY, Ying Z (1993) Cox regression with incomplete covariate measurements. J Am Stat Assoc 88(424):1341–1349MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin DY, Wei LJ, Yang I, Ying Z (2000) Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of the recurrent events. J R Stat Soc (Ser B) 62(4):711–730MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu SE, Shih JH (2006) Case-cohort designs and analysis for clustered failure time data. Biometrics 62:1138–1148MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Pepe MS, Cai J (1993) Some graphical displays and marginal regression analyses for recurrent failure times and time dependent covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 88(423):811–820CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Prentice RL (1986) A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 73(1):1–11MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaubel DE, Cai J (2004) Regression methods for gap time hazard functions of sequentially ordered multivariate failure time data. Biometrika 91(2):291–303MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaubel DE, Zeng D, Cai J (2006) A semiparametric additive rates model for recurrent event data. Lifetime Data Anal 12:389–406MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Self SG, Prentice RL (1988) Asymptotic distribution theory and efficiency results for case-cohort studies. Ann Stat 16(1):64–81MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Therneau TM, Hamilton SA (1997) rhdnase as an example of recurrent event analysis. Stat Med 16:2029–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Der Vaart AW, Wellner JA (1996) Weak convergence and empirical processes. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Wacholder S, Gail MH, Pee D, Brookmeyer R (1989) Alternative variance and efficiency calculations for the case-cohort design. Biometrika 76(1):117–123MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang H, Schaubel D, Kalbeisch JD (2011) Proportional hazards regression for the analysis of clustered survival data from case-cohort studies. Biometrics 67(1):18–28MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Statistics, Institute of MathematicsFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations