Learning Environments Research

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 133–152 | Cite as

Learning environment, attitudes and anxiety across the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics

  • Donato Deieso
  • Barry J. FraserEmail author
Original Paper


Past research has revealed that, relative to primary-school students, high-school students have less-positive attitudes to mathematics and perceive their classroom environments and teacher–student relationships less favourably. This study involved the transition experience of 541 students in 47 classes in 15 primary (year 7) and secondary (year 8) government and Catholic schools in metropolitan and regional South Australia. Scales were adapted from three established instruments, namely, the What Is Happening In this Class?, Test of Mathematics Related Attitudes and Revised Mathematics Anxiety Ratings Scale, to identify changes across the transition from primary to secondary school in terms of the classroom learning environment and students’ attitude/anxiety towards mathematics. Relative to year 7 students, year 8 students reported less Involvement, less positive Attitude to Mathematical Inquiry, less Enjoyment of Mathematics and greater Mathematics Anxiety. Differences between students in Years 7 and 8 were very similar for male and female students, although the magnitude of sex differences in attitudes was slightly different in Years 7 and 8.


Anxiety Attitudes Learning environments Mathematics Transition What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) 


  1. Aarnos, E., & Perkkila, P. (2012). Early signs of mathematics anxiety? Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1495–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbasi, M., Samadzadeh, M., & Shahbazzadegan, B. (2013). Study of mathematics anxiety in high school students and its relationship with self-esteem and teachers’ personality characteristics. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 672–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aiken, L. R. (2002). Attitudes and related psychosocial constructs: Theories, assessment, and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Al Mutawah, M. A. (2015). The influence of mathematics anxiety in middle and high school on students’ math achievement. International Education Studies, 8(11), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Outcomes-focused learning environments: Determinants and effects (advances in learning environments research series). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, I. T.-C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Sebela, M. P. (2004). Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environments in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 24(4), 245–253.Google Scholar
  10. Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ashton, R. (2008). Children’s views and transition. Improving the transfer to secondary school: How every child’s voice can matter. Support for Learning, 23(4), 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bru, E., Stornes, T., Munthe, E., & Thuen, E. (2010). Students’ perception of teacher support across the transition from primary to secondary school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burden, R. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1993). Use of classroom environment assessments in school psychology: A British perspective. Psychology in the Schools, 30(3), 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byrne, D. B., Hattie, J. A., & Fraser, B. J. (1986). Student perceptions of preferred classroom learning environment. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Catlioglu, H., Birgin, O., Costu, S., & Gurbuz, R. (2009). The level of mathematics anxiety among pre-service elementary school teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1578–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2017). The Greek elementary ‘‘What Is Happening In this Class?’’(G-EWIHIC): A three-phase multi-sample mixed-methods study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 52, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chionh, Y. H., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Classroom environment, achievement, attitudes and self-esteem in geography and mathematics in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 18, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chipangura, A., & Aldridge, J. (2016). Impact of multimedia on students’ perceptions of the learning environment in mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 20, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cohn, S. T., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Effectiveness of student response systems in terms of learning environment, attitudes and achievement. Learning Environments Research, 19, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crypton, D. (1981). Mathophobia: A disastrous hang-up. Science Digest, July, 121–123.Google Scholar
  24. Deieso, D. (2017). Changes in learning environment and students’ attitudes and anxiety associated with the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Curtin University.Google Scholar
  25. Dorman, J. P. (2003). Cross-national validation of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Learning Environments Research, 6, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dorman, J. P. (2008). Use of multitrait-multimethod modelling to validate actual and preferred forms of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 11, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feldlaufer, H., Midgley, C., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Student, teacher, and observer perceptions of the classroom environment before and after the transition to junior high school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferguson, P. D., & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Changes in learning environment during the transition from primary to secondary school. Learning Environments Research, 1, 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finlayson, M. (2014). Addressing math anxiety in the classroom. Improving Schools, 17(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science related attitudes. Science Education, 62, 509–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fraser, B. J. (1981a). Using environmental assessments to make better classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(2), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fraser, B. J. (1981b). Test of science-related attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  34. Fraser, B. J. (1982). Individualized classroom environment questionnaire. American Journal of Evaluation, 3(2), 72–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fraser, B. J. (1999). “Grain sizes” in learning environment research: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 285–296). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  36. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fraser, B. J. (2014). Classroom learning environments: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 104–119). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Fraser, B. J., & Aldridge, J. M. (2017). Improving classrooms through assessment of learning environment. In J. P. Bakken (Ed.), classrooms (Vol. 1, pp. 91–107)., Assessment practices for teachers and student improvement strategies New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Adolphe, F. S. (2010). A cross-national study of science classroom environments in Australia and Indonesia. Research in Science Education, 40, 551–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fraser, B. J., & Butts, W. L. (1982). Relationship between perceived levels of classroom individualization and science-related attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1983). Development and validation of short forms of some instruments measuring student perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Science Education, 67(1), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fraser, B. J., & Kahle, J. B. (2007). Classroom, home and peer environment influences on student outcomes in science and mathematics: An analysis of systemic reform data. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1891–1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fraser, B. J., & Lee, S. S. U. (2009). Science laboratory classroom environments in Korean high schools. Learning Environments Research, 12, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J. & Fisher, D. L. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. G. (Eds.). (1987). Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education. Perth: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University.Google Scholar
  47. Galton, M., & Morrison, I. (2000). Concluding comments. Transfer and transition: The next steps. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and elementary students’ outcomes. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 14(2), 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gough, M. F. (1954). Mathemaphobia: Causes and treatments. Clearing House, 28, 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Guillen, M. (1984). Bridges to infinity. London, UK: Rider & Company.Google Scholar
  51. Haciomeroglu, G. (2013). Mathematics anxiety and mathematical beliefs: What Is the Relationship in Elementary Pre-Service Teachers? IUMPST the Journal, 5, 1–9.Google Scholar
  52. Hayes, D., & Chodkiewicz, A. (2006). School-community links: Supporting learning in the middle years. Research Papers in Education, 21(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Helding, K. A., & Fraser, B. J. (2013). Effectiveness of NBC (National Board Certified) teachers in terms of learning environment, attitudes and achievement among secondary school students. Learning Environments Research, 16, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hine, P. (2001). Classroom environment and the transition to secondary schooling. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Curtin University.Google Scholar
  55. Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hunt, G. E. (1985). Math anxiety–Where Do We Go From Here? Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 7(2), 29–40.Google Scholar
  57. Idiris, S., & Fraser, B. J. (1997). Psychosocial environment of agricultural science classrooms in Nigeria. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jackson, C. D., & Leffingwell, R. J. (1999). The role of instructors in creating math anxiety in students from kindergarten through college. Mathematics Teacher, 92(7), 583–586.Google Scholar
  59. Jansen, B. R. J., Louwerse, J., Straatemeier, M., Van der Ven, S. H. G., Klinkenberg, S., & Van der Maas, H. L. J. (2013). The influence of experiencing success in math on math anxiety, perceived math competence, and math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. John-Henderson, N. A., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2015). Cytokine responses and math performance: The role of stereotype threat and anxiety reappraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2015). Attitude measurements in science education: Classic and contemporary approaches. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Khine, M. S., Fraser, B. J., Afari, E., Oo, Z., & Kyaw, T. T. (2017). Student perceptions of the learning environment in tertiary science classrooms in Myanmar. Learning Environments Research. Scholar
  64. Khoo, H. S., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Using classroom psychosocial environment in the evaluation of adult computer application courses in Singapore. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classrooms in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kind, P. K., & Barmby, P. (2011). Defending attitude scales. In I. M. Saleh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Attitude research in science education: Classic and contemporary measurements (pp. 117–135). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 871–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Koh, N. K., & Fraser, B. J. (2014). Learning environments associated with use of mixed mode delivery model among secondary business studies students in Singapore. Learning Environments Research, 17, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Koul, R. B., & Fisher, D. L. (2005). Cultural background and students’ perceptions of science classroom learning environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in Jammu, India. Learning Environments Research, 8, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kvedere, L. (2014). Mathematics self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety among 9th grade students in Latvia. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2687–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lim, C.-T. D., & Fraser, B. J. (2017). Learning environments in research in English classrooms. Unpublished paper, Curtin University.Google Scholar
  73. MacLeod, C., & Fraser, B. J. (2010). Development, validation and application of a modified Arabic translation of the What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 13, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Maher, D. (2010). Supporting students’ transition from primary school to high school using the internet as a communication tool. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(1), 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Marchis, I. (2011). Factors that influence secondary school students’ attitude to mathematics. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 786–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Martin-Dunlop, C., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment and attitudes associated with an innovative science course designed for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McRobbie, C. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1993). Associations between student outcomes and psychosocial science environment. The Journal of Educational Research, 87(2), 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Midgley, C., Eccles, J. S., & Feldlaufer, H. (1991). Classroom environment and the transition to junior high school. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 113–139). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  79. Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60(4), 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Moos, R. H. (1974). The social climate scales: An overview. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  81. Moos, R. H., & Trickett, E. J. (1974). Classroom Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  82. Munby, H. (1997). Issues of validity in science attitude measurement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Noyes, A. (2006). School transfer and the diffraction of learning trajectories. Research Papers in Education, 21(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ogbuehi, P. I., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 10, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Olmez, I. B., & Ozel, S. (2012). Mathematics anxiety among sixth and seventh grade Turkish elementary school students. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4933–4937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Osborne, J., Simons, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implication. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Peiro, M. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2009). Assessment and investigation of science learning environments in the early childhood grades. In M. Ortiz & C. Rubio (Eds.), Educational evaluation: 21st century issues and challenges (pp. 349–365). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  89. Perso, T. (2005). Teaching mathematics in the middle years: Is middle school necessary? Australian Mathematics Teacher, 61(1), 25–31.Google Scholar
  90. Plake, B. S., & Parker, C. S. (1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Primi, C., Busdraghi, C., Tomasetto, C., Morsanyi, K., & Chiesi, F. (2014). Measuring math anxiety in Italian college and high school students: Validity, reliability and gender invariance of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS). Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rice, J. K. (1997). The disruptive transition from middle to high school: Opportunities for linking policy and practice. Journal of Education Policy, 12(5), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rice, J. K. (2001). Explaining the negative impact of the transition from middle to high school on student performance in mathematics and science. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 372–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sarkar, A., Dowker, D., & Kadosh, R. C. (2014). Cognitive enhancement or cognitive cost: Trait-specific outcomes of brain stimulation in the case of mathematics anxiety. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(50), 16605–16610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scarpello, G. (2007). Helping students get past math anxiety. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 82(6), 34–35.Google Scholar
  98. Schacht, S., & Stewart, B. J. (1990). What’s funny about statistics? A technique for reducing anxiety. Teaching Sociology, 18(1), 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sengul, S., & Dereli, M. (2010). Does instruction of ‘Integers’ subject with cartoons affect students’ mathematics anxiety? Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2176–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Singh, M., & McNeil, J. T. (2014). Do learning environments differ across subjects and nations: Case studies in Hawaii and Singapore using the WIHIC questionnaire. Learning Environments Research, 17(2), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Spinner, H., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Evaluation of an innovative mathematics program in terms of classroom environment, student attitudes, and conceptual development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stern, G. G., Stein, M. I., & Bloom, B. S. (1956). Methods in personality assessment. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  103. Supekar, K., Iuculano, T., Chen, L., & Menon, V. (2015). Remediation of childhood math anxiety and associated neural circuits through cognitive tutoring. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(36), 12574–12583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), The international handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 597–625). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Urdan, T. C. (2010). Statistics in plain English (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Verkijika, S. F., & De Wet, L. (2015). Using a brain-computer interface (BCI) in reducing math anxiety: Evidence from South Africa. Computers & Education, 81, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wahyudi, & Treagust, D. F. (2004). The status of science classroom learning environments in Indonesian lower secondary schools. Learning Environments Research, 7, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Walberg, H. J., & Anderson, G. J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Waldrip, B. G., Fisher, D. L., & Dorman, J. (2009). Identifying exemplary science teachers through students’ perceptions of their learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 12, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wang, Z., Hart, S. A., Kovas, Y., Lukowski, S., Soden, B., Thompson, L. A., et al. (2014). Who is afraid of math? Two sources of genetic variance for mathematical anxiety. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(9), 1056–1064. Scholar
  113. Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wong, A. F. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2012). Teacher–students relationships in the classroom. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1241–1255). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1991). A comparison of inter-personal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relationships, 15, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Yang, X. (2015). Rural junior secondary school students’ perceptions of classroom learning environments and their attitude and achievement in mathematics in West China. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Yaratan, H., & Kasapoglu, L. (2012). Eighth grade students’ attitude, anxiety, and achievement pertaining to mathematics lessons. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Yarrow, A., Millwater, J., & Fraser, B. J. (1997). Improving university and primary school classroom environments through preservice teachers’ action research. International Journal of Practical Experiences in Professional Education, 1, 68–93.Google Scholar
  120. Young, C. B., Wu, S. S., & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23(5), 492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2004). Learning environments in information and communication technology classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zaragoza, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2017). Field-study science classrooms as positive and enjoyable learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zeedyk, M. S., Gallacher, J., Henderson, M., Hope, G., Husband, B., & Lindsay, K. (2003). Negotiating the transition from primary to secondary school: Perceptions of pupils, parents and teachers. School Psychology International, 24, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations