Advertisement

The homogenizing influence of agriculture on forest bird communities at landscape scales

  • Sarah Endenburg
  • Greg W. Mitchell
  • Patrick Kirby
  • Lenore Fahrig
  • Jon Pasher
  • Scott WilsonEmail author
Research Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Context

Agricultural expansion is a principal driver of biodiversity loss, but the impacts on community assembly in agro-ecosystems are less clear, especially across regional scales at which agricultural policies are applied.

Objectives

Using forest-breeding birds, we (1) tested whether increased agricultural coverage resulted in species communities that were random or more similar than expected, (2) compared the relative influence of agriculture versus distance in structuring communities, and (3) tested whether different responses to agriculture among functional guilds leads to a change in functional diversity across gradients of agriculture.

Methods

Species abundances were sampled along 229 transects, each 8 km, using citizen science data assembled across a broad region of eastern Canada. Agricultural and natural land cover were each summed within three different-sized buffers (landscapes) around each transect. A null modeling approach was used to measure community similarity.

Results

Communities were most similar between landscapes that had high agricultural coverage and became more dissimilar as their respective landscapes differed more strongly in the amount of agriculture. Community dissimilarity increased with geographic distance up to about 200 km. Dissimilarity with increasing agriculture was largely due to the disappearance of Neotropical migrants, insectivores and foliage-gleaners from the community as agriculture increased. Functional diversity declined with increasing agriculture but less strongly than species richness and only when agriculture exceeded 40% of the landscape.

Conclusions

Our results support the hypothesis that increasing agricultural coverage produces a filtering towards communities of agriculture-tolerant forest birds with a loss of functional diversity and high site-to-site community similarity.

Keywords

Agricultural intensification Beta diversity Biodiversity Bird Functional loss Guild Landscape context Spatial scale Turnover 

Notes

Supplementary material

10980_2019_895_MOESM1_ESM.docx (92 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 92 kb)

References

  1. Baselga A, Bonthoux S, Balent G (2015) Temporal beta diversity of bird assemblages in agricultural landscapes: land cover change vs. stochastic processes. PLoS ONE 10:e0127913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton TG, Bryant DM, Cole L, Crick HQP (2002) Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. J Appl Ecol 39:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bregman TP, Sekercioglu CH, Tobias JA (2014) Global patterns and predictors of bird species responses to forest fragmentation: implications for ecosystem function and conservation. Biol Conserv 169:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butt S, Ramprasad P, Fenech A (2005) Changes in the landscape of southern Ontario, Canada since 1750: impacts of European colonization. In: Fenech A, MacIver D, Auld H, Hansell R (eds) Integrated mapping assessment environment canada. Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada., Toronto, pp 83–92Google Scholar
  6. Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N (2011) Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol 48:1079–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chase JM, Kraft NJB, Smith KG, Vellend M, Inouye BD (2011) Using null models to disentangle variation in community dissimilarity from variation in α-diversity. Ecosphere 2:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chase JM, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 366:2351–2363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford HS, Jennings DT (1989) Predation by birds on spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana: functional, numerical and total responses. Ecology 70:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw 34:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crins WJ, Gray PA, Uhlig PWC, Wester M (2009) The ecosystems of Ontario. Part 1. Ecozones and ecoregions. Ontario Ministry of Natural Re-sources, Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment Section, Peterborough, Ontario. Technical Report SIB TER IMA TR-01, p 71Google Scholar
  12. Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donovan TM, Flather CH (2002) Relationships among North American songbird trends, habitat fragmentation, and landscape occupancy. Ecol Appl 12:364–374Google Scholar
  15. eBird (2018) eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance [web application]. eBird, Ithaca, New York. http://www.ebird.org. Accessed September 2018
  16. Ekroos J, Heliölä J, Kuussaari M (2010) Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Environment Canada (2017) North American breeding bird survey canadian trends website. Data Version 2015. Environment Canada, GatineauGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell CE, Fahrig L, Mitchell G, Wilson S (2019) Local habitat association does not inform landscape management of threatened birds. Landscape Ecol 34(6):1313–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisette T, Rollin P, Aly Z, Campbell L, Daneshfar B, Filyer P, Smith A, Davidson A, Shang J, Jarvis I (2013) AAFC annual crop inventory. In: The Second International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics 2013, 12–16 August 2013, Fairfax, VAGoogle Scholar
  20. Flohre A, Fischer C, Aavik T, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Bommarco R, Ceryngier P, Clement LW, Dennis C, Eggers S, Emmerson M, Geiger F, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Inchausti P, Liira J, Morales MB, Oñate JJ, Pärt T, Weisser WW, Winqvist C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2011) Agricultural intensification and biodiversity partitioning in European landscapes comparing plants, carabids, and birds. Ecol Appl 21:1772–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flores-Rentería D, Rincón A, Valladares F, Yuste JC (2016) Agricultural matrix affects differently the alpha and beta structural and functional diversity of soil microbial communities in a fragmented Mediterranean holm oak forest. Soil Biol Biochem 92:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagan JM III, Johnston PW (1992) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobson KA, Bayne E (2000) Effects of forest fragmentation by agriculture on avian communities in the southern boreal mixedwoods of western Canada. Wilson J Ornith 112:373–387Google Scholar
  25. Jackson HB, Fahrig L (2014) Are ecologists conducting research at the optimal scale? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeliazkov A, Mimet A, Chargé R, Jiguet F, Devictor V, Chiron F (2016) Impacts of agricultural intensification on bird communities: new insights from a multi-level and multi-facet approach of biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 216:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones J, Barg JJ, Sillett TS, Veit LM, Robertson RJ (2004) Minimum estimates of survival and population growth for Cerulean Warblers (Dendroica cerulea) breeding in Ontario, Canada. Auk 121:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karp DS, Rominger AJ, Zook J, Ranganathan J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2012) Intensive agriculture erodes β-diversity at large scales. Ecol Lett 15:963–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karp DS, Ziv G, Zook J, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2011) Resilience and stability in bird guilds across tropical countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:21134–21139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kramer GR, Andersen DE, Buehler DA, Wood PB, Peterson SM, Lehman JA, Aldinger KR, Bulluck LP, Harding S, Jones JA, Loegering JP, Smalling C, Vallender R, Streby HM (2018) Population trends in Vermivora warblers are linked to strong migratory connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E3192–E3200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynch JF, Whigham DF (1984) Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding bird communities in Maryland, USA. Biol Conserv 28:287–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin AE, Fahrig L (2018) Habitat specialists disperse farther and are more migratory than habitat generalist birds. Ecology 99:2058–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, Sekercioglu CH, Alkemade R, Booth H, Purves DW (2013) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20122131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. North American Bird Conservation Initiative Canada (NABCI) (2012) The State of Canada’s Birds, 2012. Environment Canada, Ottawa, p 36Google Scholar
  36. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  37. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petit DR, Lynch JF, Hutto RL, Blake JG, Waide RB (1995) Habitat use and conservation in the Neotropics. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 145–197Google Scholar
  40. Podani J, Schmera D (2006) On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pomara LY, Ruokolainen K, Young KR (2013) Avian species composition across the Amazon River: the roles of dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity. J Biogeogr 41:784–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pulliam HR (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol Lett 3:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raup D, Crick R (1979) Measurement of faunal similarity in paleontology. J Paleontol 53:1213–1227Google Scholar
  44. Rodewald P (2018) The Birds of North America: https://birdsna.org. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY
  45. Rushing CS, Dudash MR, Studds CE, Marra PP (2015) Annual variation in long-distance dispersal driven by breeding and non-breeding season climatic conditions in a migratory bird. Ecography 38:1006–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski Jr DJ, Link WA (2017) The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2015. Version 01.30.2015 USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MDGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmiegelow FKA, Machtans CS, Hannon SJ (1997) Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. Ecology 78:1914–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sibley DA (2000) The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 31:68–80Google Scholar
  50. Suarez-Rubio M, Wilson S, Leimgruber P, Lookingbill P (2013) Threshold responses of forest birds to landscape changes around exurban development. PLoS ONE 8(6):e67593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
  52. Tilman D (2001) Functional diversity. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260–20264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 222:1300–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tittler R (2008) Source–sink dynamics, dispersal, and landscape effects on North American songbirds. Dissertation, Carleton University, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  56. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu CH, Dietsch TV, Sodhi NS, Hoehn P, Tylianakis JM (2008) Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vallejos MAV, Padial AA, Vitule JRS (2016) Human-induced landscape changes homogenize Atlantic Forest bird assemblages through nested species loss. PLoS ONE 11:e0147058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Dorp D, Opdam PFM (1987) Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Land Ecol 1:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vellend M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM, Jacquemyn H, Kolb A, Van Calster H, Peterken G, Graae BJ, Bellemare J, Honnay O, Brunet J, Wulf M, Gerhardt F, Hermy M (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species-environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95:567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waltert M, Bobo KS, Sainge NM, Fermon H, Mühlenberg M (2005) From forest to farmland: habitat effects on Afrotropical forest bird diversity. Ecol Appl 15:1351–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W (2014) Elton Traits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson S, Mitchell GW, Pasher J, McGovern M, Hudson M-AR, Fahrig L (2017) Influence of crop type, heterogeneity and woody structure on avian biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Indic 83:218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson S, Saracco JF, Krikun R, Flockhart DT, Godwin CM, Foster KR (2018a) Drivers of demographic decline across the annual cycle of a threatened migratory bird. Sci Rep 8:7316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson S, Smith AC, Naujokaitis-Lewis I (2018b) Opposing responses to drought shape population dynamics of declining grassland birds. Divers Distrib 24:1687–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zuckerberg B, Fink D, La Sorte FA, Hochacka WM, Kelling S (2016) Novel seasonal land cover associations for eastern North American forest birds identified through dynamic species distribution modeling. Divers Distrib 22:717–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change CanadaNational Wildlife Research CentreOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Landscape Science and Technology Division, Environment and Climate Change CanadaNational Wildlife Research CentreOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations