Drivers of fine-scale avian functional diversity with changing land use: an assessment of the effects of eco-estate housing development and management
- 101 Downloads
The effects of changing land use, and especially urbanisation, on species and functional diversity are of global concern. Eco-estates are a form of urban housing development that is suggested to partially negate the effects of landscape development.
We assessed avian functional diversity at four eco-estates (previously sugarcane plantations) and one sugarcane plantation site along the north coast of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa. We determined whether the differing development, management types, and the effects of land-cover configuration and composition at the respective study sites influenced avian functional diversity.
Fixed-radius point-count surveys were conducted within varying levels of land cover (natural, semi-natural, golf course and urban) at each eco-estate, and at a control sugarcane plantation site (natural, sugarcane-natural, and sugarcane land cover). The influence of differing land-cover covariates on all three components of functional diversity (functional richness, evenness, and divergence) were determined through a series of general linear models.
Sections of the respective study sites with increased natural land cover, mainly in the form of indigenous forest and coastal thicket/dense bush, showed improved avian functional diversity in comparison to those with increased building and road density. Negative effects of increased building density may be offset through an interconnection with or incorporation within natural land cover. Each component of functional diversity was influenced dynamically by seasonal changes and depending on land-cover type.
Eco-estates improved avian functional diversity if natural habitats are emphasised and connected. We suggest future development and management for eco-estates and agricultural land in coastal KZN follow ecological land-use complementation, to improve local ecosystem functioning.
KeywordsLand use Functional richness Functional evenness Functional divergence Ecological land-use complementation Urbanisation Agriculture Land transformation
The authors wish to thank the management of the eco-estates and sugarcane site for granting permission and access onto their sites. This research was made possible through funding from the eThekwini Municipality: Durban Action Research Partnership (D’RAP), the National Research Foundation (ZA), and the University of KwaZulu-Natal.
- Adams CE, Lindsey KJ, Ash SJ (2006) Urban wildlife management. CRC Press, USAGoogle Scholar
- Allan E, Manning P, Alt F, Binkenstein J, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Böhm S, Grassein F, Hölzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Morris KE, Oelmann Y, Prati D, Renner SC, Rillig MC, Schaefer M, Schloter M, Schmitt B, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Solly M, Sorkau E, Steckel J, Steffen-Dewenter I, Stempfhuber B, Tschapka M, Weiner CN, Weisser WW, Werner M, Westphal C, Wilcke W, Fischer M (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett 18:834–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- DeGraaf RM, Wentworth JM (1986) Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. J Urban Ecol 9:339–412Google Scholar
- ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop 10.4. Environmental systems research institute. RedlandsGoogle Scholar
- Gelman A, Ys S, Yajima M, Hill J, Pittay MG, Kerman J, Zheng T, Dorie V (2009) Arm: data analysis using regression and multi-level/hierarchical models. R packageGoogle Scholar
- Geoterraimage (2017) KZN Province land-cover mapping (from SPOT5 Satellite imagery circa 2013). Prepared for Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (Biodiversity Research). South AfricaGoogle Scholar
- Goble BJ, van der Elst R (2012) Trends in coastal development and land-cover change: the case of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Western Indian Ocean J Mar Sci 11:193–204Google Scholar
- Groom MJ (2006) Threats to biodiversity. In: Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR (eds) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 63–110Google Scholar
- Hockey PAR, Dean WRJ, Ryan PG (2005) Roberts birds of southern Africa, 7th edn. John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
- Hooke RL, Martin-Duque JF, Pedraza J (2012) Land transformation by humans, a review. Geol Soc Am 22:4–10Google Scholar
- Kulkarni M, Dighe S, Sawant A, Oswal P, Sahasrabuddhe K, Patwardhan A (2001) Institutions: biodiversity hotspots in urban areas. In: Ganeshaiah KN, Uma Shnker R, Bawa KS (eds) Tropical ecosystems: structure. Diversity and Human Welfare, Oxford/IBH, India, pp 693–695Google Scholar
- Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2014) FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12Google Scholar
- MacArthur RH, Wilson OE (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Melles S, Glenn S, Martin C (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species–environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7:22Google Scholar
- Primack RB (1993) Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rollinson DP, Coleman J, Downs CT (2014) Roost temperature and fidelity of Wahlberg’s epauletted fruit bat, Epomophorus wahlbergi, in an urban environment. J Afr Zool 49:173–180Google Scholar
- Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow R, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge D, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar