Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 7, pp 1195–1209 | Cite as

Influence of landscape structure, topography, and forest type on spatial variation in historical fire regimes, Central Oregon, USA

  • Andrew G. Merschel
  • Emily K. Heyerdahl
  • Thomas A. Spies
  • Rachel A. Loehman
Research Article
  • 260 Downloads

Abstract

Context

In the interior Northwest, debate over restoring mixed-conifer forests after a century of fire exclusion is hampered by poor understanding of the pattern and causes of spatial variation in historical fire regimes.

Objectives

To identify the roles of topography, landscape structure, and forest type in driving spatial variation in historical fire regimes in mixed-conifer forests of central Oregon.

Methods

We used tree rings to reconstruct multicentury fire and forest histories at 105 plots over 10,393 ha. We classified fire regimes into four types and assessed whether they varied with topography, the location of fuel-limited pumice basins that inhibit fire spread, and an updated classification of forest type.

Results

We identified four fire-regime types and six forest types. Although surface fires were frequent and often extensive, severe fires were rare in all four types. Fire regimes varied with some aspects of topography (elevation), but not others (slope or aspect) and with the distribution of pumice basins. Fire regimes did not strictly co-vary with mixed-conifer forest types.

Conclusions

Our work reveals the persistent influence of landscape structure on spatial variation in historical fire regimes and can help inform discussions about appropriate restoration of fire-excluded forests in the interior Northwest. Where the goal is to restore historical fire regimes at landscape scales, managers may want to consider the influence of topoedaphic and vegetation patch types that could affect fire spread and ignition frequency.

Keywords

Dendroecology Landscape structure Fire history Fire regimes Eastern Cascades Reference conditions Forest restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Meg Krawchuk, Don Falk, Matt Reilly, Emily Comfort, and two anonymous reviews for comments on earlier drafts. This work was facilitated through the Nature Conservancy, Deschutes National Forest, and the Deschutes Collaborative Forest Project. Funding was provided by the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Deschutes National Forest, and the USFS Pacific Northwest Research Station. We thank Pete Caligiuri and Mark Stern for their assistance in coordinating and implementing the project. We thank Pete Powers for his summary of management history in the study area. We thank Calvin Farris for his methodological assistance with mapping historical fires, and Chris Zanger, Keith Olsen, and Ray Davis for help with GIS work. We thank Abby Eurich, Brent Gaither, Kelly Regan, James Johnston, Kayla Johnston, Dawn Pepper, Ben Hart, Lauren Matoszuik, Andrés Holz, Bobby Burdick, and Beatrice Serrano-Martinez for assistance in the field and with dendrochronological work.

Supplementary material

10980_2018_656_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1234 kb)

References

  1. Agee JK (1993) Fire ecology of pacific northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  2. Agee JK, Wakimoto RH, Biswell HH (1978) Fire and fuel dynamics of Sierra Nevada conifers. For Ecol Manage 1:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Applequist MB (1958) A simple pith locator for use with off-center increment cores. J Forest 56(2):141Google Scholar
  4. Arabas KB, Hadley KS, Larson ER (2006) Fire history of a naturally fragmented landscape in central Oregon. Can J For Res 36:1108–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arno SF, Sneck KM (1977) A method for determining fire history in coniferous forests of the mountain west. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-INT-42Google Scholar
  6. Baker WL (2012) Implications of spatially extensive historical data from surveys for restoring dry forests of Oregon’s eastern Cascades. Ecosphere 3(23):1–39Google Scholar
  7. Baker WL (2015) Historical Northern spotted owl habitat and old-growth dry forests maintained by mixed-severity wildfires (2015). Landscape Ecol 30:655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banwell EM, Varner MJ, Knapp EE, Van Kirk RW (2013) Spatial, seasonal, and diel forest floor moisture dynamics in Jeffrey pine-white fire forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin, USA. For Ecol Manag 305:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartlein PJ, Hostetler SW, Shafer SL, Holman JO, Solomon AM (2008) Temporal and spatial structure in a daily wildfire-start data set from the western United States (1986–96). Int. J. Wildland Fire 17(1):8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J For 64:691–692Google Scholar
  11. Bergeron Y (1991) The influence of island and mainland lakeshore landscapes on boreal forest fire regimes. Ecology 72:1980–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SJ, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3):127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Camp A, Oliver C, Hessburg P, Everett R (1997) Predicting late-successional fire refugia pre-dating European settlement in the Wenatchee Mountains. For Ecol Manag 95(1):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Magalhães RM, Schwilk DW (2012) Leaf traits and litter flammability: evidence for non-additive mixture effects in a temperate forest. J Ecol 100:1153–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farris CA, Baisan CH, Falk DA, Yool SR, Swetnam TW (2010) Spatial and temporal corroboration of a fire-scar based fire history in a frequently burned ponderosa pine forest. Ecol Appl 20(6):1598–1614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Frost CC (2006) History and future of the longleaf pine ecosystem. In: Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller DL (eds) The longleaf pine ecosystem—ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York, pp 9–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gara R, Littke W, Agee J, Geiszler D, Stuart J, Driver C (1985) Influence of fires, fungi and mountain pine beetles on development of a lodgepole pine forest in south-central Oregon. In: Baumgartner DM et al (eds) Lodgepole pine: the species and its management Symposium Proceedings. Washington State University, Pullman, pp 153–162Google Scholar
  18. Geist JM, Cochran PH (1991) Influences of volcanic ash and pumice deposition on productivity of wester interior forest soils. In: Harvey AE, Neuenschwander EH (eds) Proceedings: Management and Productivity of Western-Montane Forest Soils. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep, Boise, Idaho. 10–12 April 1990INT-280:82.89Google Scholar
  19. Geiszler DR, Gara RI, Driver CH, Gallucci VF, Martin RE (1980) Fire, fungi, and beetle influences on a lodgepole pine ecosystem of south-central Oregon. Oecologia 46:239–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagmann KR, Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2013) Historical structure and composition of ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests in south-central Oregon. For Ecol Manage 304:492–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagmann KR, Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2014) Historical conditions in mixed-conifer forests on the eastern slopes of the northern Oregon Cascade Range, USA. For Ecol Manage 330:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haugo R, Zanger C, DeMeo T, Ringo C, Shlisky A, Blankenship K, Simpson M, Mellen-McLean K, Kertis J, Stern M (2015) A new approach to evaluate forest structure restoration needs across Oregon and Washington, USA. For Ecol Manage 335:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hellberg E, Niklasson M, Granström A (2004) Influence of landscape structure on patterns of forest fires in boreal forest landscapes in Sweden. Can J For Res 34:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hessburg PF, Spies TA, Perry DA, Skinner CN, Taylor AH, Brown PM, Stephens SL, Larson AJ, Churchill DJ, Povak NA, Singleton PH, McComb B, Zielinski WJ, Collins BM, Salter RB, Keane JJ, Franklin JF, Riegel G (2016) Tamm review: management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California. For Ecol Manage 366:221–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heyerdahl EK, Brubaker LB, Agee JK (2001) Spatial controls of historical fire regimes: a multiscale example form the interior west, USA. Ecology 82(3):660–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heyerdahl EK, Falk DA, Loehman RA (2014a) Data archived with the International Multiproxy Paleofire Database, IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology. NOAA/NCDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder, Colorado, USA. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo-search/study/23655
  27. Heyerdahl EK, Loehman RA, Falk DA (2014b) Mixed-severity fire in lodgepole pine dominated forests: area historical regimes sustainable on Oregon’s Pumice Plateau, USA? Can J For Res 44:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmes RL (1983) Program COFECHA User’s Manual. Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, The University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  29. Holsinger S, Parks SA, Miller C (2016) Weather, fuels and topography impede wildland fire spread in western US landscapes. For Ecol Manag 380:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howard JL, Aleksoff, KC (2000) Abies grandis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/abigra/all.html Accessed 22 Nov 2016
  31. Johnston JD (2017) Forest succession along a productivity gradient following fire exclusion. For Ecol Manag 392:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnston JD, Bailey JD, Dunn CJ (2016) Influence of fire disturbance and biophysical heterogeneity on pre-settlement ponderosa pine and mixed conifer forests. Ecosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1581 Google Scholar
  33. Johnston JD, Bailey JD, Dunn CJ, Lindsay AA (2017) Historical fire-climate relationships in contrasting interior pacific northwest forest types. Fire Ecol 13(2):18–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jordan GJ, Fortin MJ, Lertzman KP (2008) Spatial pattern and persistence of historical fire boundaries in southern interior British Columbia. Environ Ecol Stat 15(4):523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kellogg LB, McKenzie D, Peterson DL, Hessl A (2008) Spatial models for inferring topographic control son historical low-severity fire in the Eastern Cascade Range of Washington, USA. Landscape Ecol 23:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levine CR, Cogbill CV, Collins BM, Larson AJ, Lutz JA, North MP, Restaino CM, Safford HD, Stephens SL, Battles JJ (2017) Evaluating a new method for reconstructing forest conditions from General Land Office survey records. Ecol Appl 27(5):1498–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lotan J, Brown J, Neuenschwander L (1985) Role of fire in lodgepole pine forests. In: Baumgartner D et al (eds) Lodgepole pine: the species and its management Symposium Proceedings. Washington State University, Pullman, pp 133–152Google Scholar
  38. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 289(2)Google Scholar
  39. McCune B, Mefford MJ (2010) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6.243 beta. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Merschel AG, Spies TA, Heyerdahl EK (2014) Mixed-conifer forests of central Oregon: effects of logging and fire exclusion vary with environment. Ecol Appl 24(7):1670–1688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan P, Hardy CC, Swetnam TW, Rollins MG, Long DG (2001) Mapping fire regimes across time and space: understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns. Int J Wildl Fire 10(4):329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morris MG (1934) Lightning Storms and Fires on the National Forests of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Experiment Station, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  43. Nielsen SE, DeLancy ER, Reinhardt K, Parisien M (2016) Effects of lakes on wildfire activity in the boreal forests of Saskatchewan, Canada. Forests.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110265 Google Scholar
  44. Parks SA, Parisien SA, Miller C (2012) Spatial bottom–up controls on fire likelihood vary across western North America. Ecosphere 3(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perry DA, Jing DA, Youngblood A, Oetter DR (2004) Forest structure and fire susceptibility in volcanic landscapes of the Eastern High Cascades. Oregon. Conservation Biology 18(4):913926Google Scholar
  46. PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University. 2016. http://prism.oregonstate.edu
  47. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
  48. Rollins MG (2009) LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. Int J Wildl Fire 18:235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schoennagel TT, Veblen T, Romme WH (2004) The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across rocky mountain forests. Bioscience 54(7):661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simpson M (2007) Forested plant associations of the Oregon East Cascades. R6-NR-ECOL-TP-03-2007. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, USAGoogle Scholar
  51. Spies TA, Hemstrom MA, Youngblood A, Hummel S (2006) Conserving old-growth forest diversity in disturbance-prone landscapes. Conserv Biol 20(2):351–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Stevens JT, Safford HD, North MP, Fried JS, Gray AN, Brown PM, Dolanc CR, Dobrowski SZ, Falk DA, Farris CA, Franklin JF, Fulé PZ, Hagmann RK, Knapp EE, Miller JD, Smith DF, Swetnam TW, Taylor AH (2016) Average stand age from forest inventory plots does not describe historical fire regimes in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of western North America. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0147688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Stine P, Hessburg P, Spies T, Kramer M, Fettig CJ, Hansen A, Lehmkuhl J, O’Hara K, Polivka K, Singleton P, Charnley S, Merschel A, White R (2014) The Ecology of Moist Mixed-conifer Forests in Eastern Oregon and Washington: a Synthesis of the Relevant Biophysical Science and Implications for Future Land Management. PNW-GTR-897. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, USA. p. 254Google Scholar
  54. Stuart JD, Agee JK, Gara R (1989) Lodgepole pine regeneration in an old, self-perpetuating forest in south central Oregon. Can J Forest Res 19:1096–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sugihara NG, van Wagtenkdonk JW, Shaffer KE, Fites-Kaufman J, Thode AE (2006) Fire in California’s Ecosystems. University of California Press, BerkeleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swetnam TW, Wickman BE, Paul HG, Baisan CH (1995) Historical patterns of western spruce budworm and Douglas-fir tussock moth outbreaks in the northern Blue Mountains, Oregon since A.D. 1700. GTR-PNW-484. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor AH, Skinner CN (2003) Spatial patterns and controls on historical fire regimes and forest structure in the Klamath mountains. Ecol Appl 13(3):704–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Wagtendonk JW (1993) Spatial patterns of lightning strikes and fires in Yosemite National Park. In: Proceedings 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, vol 12, pp. 223–231Google Scholar
  59. Vogt BJ, Hodanish SJ (2014) A high-resolution lightning map of the state of Colorado. Mon Weather Rev 142:2353–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Volland AL (1985) Plant associations of the central Oregon pumice zone. R6 Ecol 104-1985. Portland OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. 138 pGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright CS, Agee JK (2004) Fire and vegetation history in the eastern cascade mountains, Washington. Ecol Appl 14(2):443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Engineering Resources and Management, College of ForestryOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationMissoulaUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.US Geological Survey, Alaska Science CenterAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations