A landscape index of ecological integrity to inform landscape conservation
- 247 Downloads
Conservation planning is increasingly using “coarse filters” based on the idea of conserving “nature’s stage”. One such approach is based on ecosystems and the concept of ecological integrity, although myriad ways exist to measure ecological integrity.
To describe our ecosystem-based index of ecological integrity (IEI) and its derivative index of ecological impact (ecoImpact), and illustrate their applications for conservation assessment and planning in the northeastern United States.
We characterized the biophysical setting of the landscape at the 30 m cell resolution using a parsimonious suite of settings variables. Based on these settings variables and mapped ecosystems, we computed a suite of anthropogenic stressor metrics reflecting intactness (i.e., freedom from anthropogenic stressors) and resiliency metrics (i.e., connectivity to similar neighboring ecological settings), quantile-rescaled them by ecosystem and geographic extent, and combined them in a weighted linear model to create IEI. We used the change in IEI over time under a land use scenario to compute ecoImpact.
We illustrated the calculation of IEI and ecoImpact to compare the ecological integrity consequences of a 70-year projection of urban growth to an alternative scenario involving securing a network of conservation core areas (reserves) from future development.
IEI and ecoImpact offer an effective way to assess ecological integrity across the landscape and examine the potential ecological consequences of alternative land use and land cover scenarios to inform conservation decision making.
KeywordsLandscape pattern Landscape metrics Ecological assessment Conservation planning Landscape conservation design Coarse filter
This work was supported by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC), US Geological Survey Northeast Climate Science Center, Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, The Trustees of Reservations, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, The Nature Conservancy, US Department of Transportation, and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. We especially thank Andrew Milliken and Scott Schwenk of the NALCC for their continued support and close involvement in several conservation applications involving the DSL project and the use of IEI.
- DeNormandie J, Corcoran C (2009) Losing ground beyond the footprint: patterns of development and their impact on the nature of Massachusetts. Fourth Edition of the Losing Ground Series, MassAudubon (http://www.massaudubon.org/content/download/8601/149722/file/LosingGround_print.pdf)
- Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology. Island Press, Covelo, CA, Science and Solutions, p 504Google Scholar
- Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song D-X, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze PC (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, USAGoogle Scholar
- Lentz EE, Stippa SR, Thieler ER, Plant NG, Gesch DB, Horton RM (2015) Evaluating coastal landscape response to sea-level rise in the northeastern United States—approach and methods: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1252, p 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141252 ISSN 2331–1258 (online)
- McGarigal K, Plunkett EB, Grand J, Compton BW, Portante T, Rolih K, Jackson SD (2013) Empirically derived indices of biotic integrity for forested wetlands, coastal salt marshes and wadable freshwaters streams in Massachusetts. Report to Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, September 15, 2013, p 249Google Scholar
- McGarigal K, Compton BW, Plunkett EB, Deluca WV Grand J (2017) Designing sustainable landscapes project: documents and data products. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/designing_sustainable_landscapes/
- McGarigal K, Plunkett EB, Willey L, Compton BW, DeLuca WV, Grand J (2018) Modelling urban growth in the northeastern United States: the SPRAWL model and the ecological impacts of urban growth. Ecol Model 177:178–190Google Scholar
- Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J, De Palma A, Díaz S, Echeverria-Londoño S, Edgar MJ, Feldman A, Garon M, Harrison MLK, Alhusseini T, Ingram DJ, Itescu Y, Kattge J, Kemp V, Kirkpatrick L, Kleyer M, Correia DLP, Martin CD, Meiri S, Novosolov M, Pan Y, Phillips HRP, Purves DW, Robinson A, Simpson J, Tuck SL, Weiher E, White HJ, Ewers RM, Mace GM, Scharlemann JPW, Purvis A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parrish JD, Braun DP, Unnassch RS (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Meas Ecol Integr Prot Areas 53:851–860Google Scholar
- Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proenca V, Alkemade R, Scharlemann JPW, Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Araujo MB, Balvanera P, Biggs R, Cheung WWL, Chini L, Cooper HD, Gilman EL, Guenette S, Hurtt GC, Huntington HP, Mace GM, Oberdorff T, Revenga C, Rodrigues P, Scholes RJ, Sumaila UR, Walpole M (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330:1496–1501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pickett STA, Parker VT, Fiedler PL (1992) The new paradigm in ecology: implications for conservation above the species level. In: Fiedler PL, Jain SK (eds) Conservation biology: theory and practice of nature conservation and management. Chapman and Hall Press, New York, pp 65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sala OE, Chapin FC III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott JM, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss R, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, D’Erchia F, Edwards TC Jr, Ulliman J, Wright RG (1993) GAP analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildl Monogr 123:1–41Google Scholar
- Soulé ME, Terborgh J (eds) (1999) Continental conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Turner MG, Gardner RH (2015) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, New York, p 482Google Scholar
- Venter O, Sanderson EW, Magrach A, Allan JR, BeherJ Jones KR, Possingham HP, Laurance WF, Wood P, Fekete BM, Levy MA, Watson JEM (2016) Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat Commun 7:12558CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar