Activating landscape ecology: a governance framework for design-in-science
- 96 Downloads
In response to predominantly local and private approaches to landscape change, landscape ecologists should critically assess the multiscalar influences on landscape design.
This study develops a governance framework for Nassauer and Opdam’s “Design-in-Science” model. Its objective is to create an approach for examining hierarchical constraints on landscape design in order to investigate linkages among urban greening initiatives, patterns of landscape change, and the broader societal values driving those changes. It aims to provide an integrative and actionable approach for landscape sustainability science.
This framework is examined through an ethnographic study of public policy processes surrounding the urban tree initiatives in Boston, MA; Philadelphia, PA; and Baltimore, MD.
These initiatives demonstrate the impact of political and economic decentralization on urban landscape patterns. Their collaborative governance approach incorporates diverse resources to implement programming at a fine-scale. The predominant tree giveaway program fragments the urban and regional forest.
Spatial and temporal fragmentation undermines the long-term security of urban greening programs, and it suggests reconsideration of the role of state regimes in driving broad scale spatial planning.
KeywordsLandscape sustainability science Landscape ecology Policy Governance Design-in-science Urban ecology Urban forest Boston Philadelphia Baltimore
- Agrawal A (2010) Local institutions and adaptation to climate change. In: Mearns R (ed) Social dimensions of climate change. equity and vulnerability in a warming world. World Bank Publications, Singapore, pp 173–198Google Scholar
- Allen TF, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a unified ecology. New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Bebbington AJ, Batterbury SPJ (2001) Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: political ecologies of globalization. Cult Geogr 8(4):369–380Google Scholar
- Bridge G, Perreault T (2009) Environmental Governance. In: Castree N, Demeritt D, Liverman D, Rhoads B (eds) A companion to environmental geography. Blackwell Publishing, West SussexGoogle Scholar
- Dwyer JF, Nowak DJ, Noble MH (2003) Sustaining urban forests. J Arboric 29:49–55Google Scholar
- Foo K (2017) Institutionalizing urban possibility: urban greening and vacant land governance in three American Cities. In: Henneberry John (ed) Transience and permanence in urban development. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, U.KGoogle Scholar
- Forman RT (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Jessop B (2008) State power. Polity Press, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
- Johnston DM, Wescoat JL (2008) Political economies of landscape change. Springer, DordrechGoogle Scholar
- Marcus GE (1986) Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system. In: Clifford J, Marcus GE (eds) Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Nowak DJ (1993) Historical vegetation change in Oakland and its implications for urban forest management. J Arboric 19(5):313–319Google Scholar
- O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Peet R, Hartwick E (2015) Theories of development: contentions, arguments, alternatives. Guilford Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Polanyi K, MacIver RM (1944) The great transformation, vol 2. Beacon Press, Boston, p 145Google Scholar
- Smith DE (2005) Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, LanhamGoogle Scholar