Abstract
Animal travel between habitat patches affects populations, communities, and ecosystems. I used computer simulations to test whether animals form an emergent response to edges—i.e., whether simply responding to an edge causes an animal to behave as if it can recognize edge tortuosity. Animals were simulated inside a habitat patch that contained a tortuous edge and three straight edges. I varied the following parameters: scale of edge tortuosity, edge crossing probability, and avoidance/attraction to edges. Permeability estimates were standardized to remove the effects of edge length, path shape, path size, and distance to animals. Results showed that when animals are attracted to edges, or are neutral to edges and have a high edge-crossing probability, edge tortuosity does not affect permeability. However, when animals avoid edges, or are neutral to edges and have a low edge-crossing probability, then permeability is higher at smaller scales. Linking this to body size suggests that larger animals who avoid edges have increased edge permeability compared to smaller animals. Edge tortuosity also affects where animals cross edges and what direction they travel after crossing them. Thus, edge tortuosity can affect metapopulation dynamics in more ways than simply due to an increase in edge length.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10980-014-0008-0/MediaObjects/10980_2014_8_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10980-014-0008-0/MediaObjects/10980_2014_8_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10980-014-0008-0/MediaObjects/10980_2014_8_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10980-014-0008-0/MediaObjects/10980_2014_8_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10980-014-0008-0/MediaObjects/10980_2014_8_Fig5_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auburn Z, Bull C, Kerr G (2009) The visual perceptual range of a lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. J Ethol 27:75–81. doi:10.1007/s10164-008-0086-z
Buechner M (1989) Are small-scale landscape features important factors for field studies of small mammal dispersal sinks? Landscape Ecol 2:191–199
Cain ML (1985) Random search by herbivorous insects: a simulation model. Ecology 66:876–888
Ewers RM, Thorpe S, Didham RK (2007) Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape. Ecology 88:96–106
Forero-Medina G, Vieira M (2009) Perception of a fragmented landscape by neotropical marsupials: effects of body mass and environmental variables. J Trop Ecol 25:53–62. doi:10.1017/S0266467408005543
Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York
Fried JH, Levey DJ, Hogsette JA (2005) Habitat corridors function as both drift fences and movement conduits for dispersing flies. Oecologia 143:645–651
Gillis EA, Nams VO (1998) How red-backed voles find habitat patches. Can J Zool 76:791–794
Goodwin B, Fahrig L (2002) How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99:552–570
Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:215–227
Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253–260
Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, O’Neill RV, Coleman PR (1987) Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48:321–324
Lathrop RG Jr, Peterson DL (1991) Identifying structural self-similarity in mountainous landscapes. Landscape Ecol 6:233–238
Lidicker W (1999) Responses of mammals to habitat edges: an overview. Landscape Ecol 14:333–343
Malcolm J (1994) Edge effects in central Amazonian forest fragments. Ecology 75:2438–2445
Mech S, Zollner P (2002) Using body size to predict perceptual range. Oikos 98:47–52
Nams VO (2011) Emergent properties of patch shapes affect edge permeability to animals. PLoS ONE 6:e21886. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021886
Nams VO (2012) Shape of patch edges affects edge permeability. Ecol Appl 22:1827–1837
Pe’er G, Kramer-Schadt S (2008) Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models. Ecol Model 213:73–85. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.020
Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99. doi:10.1086/an.2001.158.issue-1
Schooley RL, Branch LC (2005) Limited perceptual range and anemotaxis in marsh rice rats Oryzomys palustris. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 50:59–66. doi:10.1007/BF03192619
Schtickzelle N, Joiris A, Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2007) Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evol Biol 7:4
Stamps J, Buechner M, Krishnan VV (1987) The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. Am Nat 129:533–552
Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573. doi:10.2307/3544927
Tischendorf L, Grez A, Zaviezo T, Fahrig L (2005) Mechanisms affecting population density in fragmented habitat. Ecol Soc 10(1):7. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art7/. Accessed 5 July 2011
Van Kirk RW, Lewis MA (1999) Edge permeability and population persistence in isolated habitat patches. Nat Resour Model 12:37–64. doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.1999.tb00003.x
Wolfram Research (2010) Mathematica, Version 8.0. Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nams, V.O. Tortuosity of habitat edges affects animal movement. Landscape Ecol 29, 655–663 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0008-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0008-0