Advertisement

Natural convection of a non-Newtonian ferrofluid in a porous elliptical enclosure in the presence of a non-uniform magnetic field

  • M. R. Daneshvar Garmroodi
  • A. AhmadpourEmail author
  • M. R. Hajmohammadi
  • S. Gholamrezaie
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, laminar natural convection of a non-Newtonian ferrofluid inside an elliptical porous cavity was numerically simulated in the presence of a non-uniform external magnetic field. This natural convection problem was relevant to the cooling of micro-sized electronic devices. The well-known finite volume method was employed to discretize the governing equations for ferrofluid flow under the effect of an external magnetic field. The effects of pertinent non-dimensional numbers including the Rayleigh number, the magnetic number, the power-law index, and the Darcy number were studied on the flow pattern and the heat transfer rate of the non-Newtonian ferrofluid. The results showed that by applying the magnetic field by a wire, the overall heat transfer rate increased significantly. Moreover, to achieve the maximum heat transfer enhancement, the wire should have been placed at the center of the elliptical walls of the enclosure. It was also shown that the impact of the power-law index on the heat transfer rate was considerable, and using a shear-thinning liquid increased the average Nusselt number in the porous elliptical enclosure.

Keywords

Ferrofluid Porous media Non-Newtonian fluid Magnetic field Natural convection 

List of symbols

a

Large inner ellipse radius

b

Small inner ellipse radius

\(\vec{B}\)

Magnetic induction

C

Consistency index (Nsn m−2)

CP

Specific heat capacity (J kg−1 K−1)

Cd

Inertia coefficient of porous media

d

Outer ellipse radius

Da

Darcy number

Dij

Rate of deformation tensor

g

Gravitational acceleration (ms−2)

\(\vec{H}\)

Magnetic field vector (A m−1)

I

Electrical intensity (A)

L

Reference length (m)

m

Consistency index

Mn

Magnetic non-dimensional number

n

Power-law index

Nu

Nusselt number

P

Pressure (Pa)

Pr

Prandtl number

Ra

Rayleigh number

\(\vec{u},\,\vec{v}\)

Velocity vector components (m s−1)

x, y

Cartesian coordinates (m)

Greek symbols

α

Thermal diffusivity (m2 s−1)

θ

Non-dimensional temperature

ν

Kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)

μ

Dynamic viscosity (kg m−1 s−1)

μ0

Magnetic permeability in a vacuum (= 4π × 10−7 T m A−1)

χ

Magnetic susceptibility

β

Thermal expansion coefficient (1 K−1)

ρ

Density (kg m−3)

φ

Solid volume fraction

κ

Permeability of porous medium (m2)

τ

Shear stress (Pa)

ε

Porosity

λ

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

Subscript

avg

Average

c

Cold

eff

Effective (porous media)

f

Base fluid

h

Hot

nf

Mixture (nanofluid)

p

Particle

w

Wall

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu S-H, Lee K-S, Yook S-J. Natural convection around a radial heat sink. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2010;53(13–14):2935–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dondapati RS, et al. Computational prediction of pressure drop and heat transfer with cryogen based nanofluids to be used in micro-heat exchangers. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;130:133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nield DA, Bejan A. Convection in porous media, vol. 3. Berlin: Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gangawane KM, Gupta S. Mixed convection characteristics in rectangular enclosure containing heated elliptical block: effect of direction of moving wall. Int J Therm Sci. 2018;130:100–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dogonchi AS, et al. Natural convection analysis in a cavity with an inclined elliptical heater subject to shape factor of nanoparticles and magnetic field. Arab J Sci Eng. 2019;44(9):7919–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheikholeslami M, et al. A study of natural convection heat transfer in a nanofluid filled enclosure with elliptic inner cylinder. Int J Numer Meth Heat Fluid Flow. 2014;24(8):1906–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheikholeslami M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. On simulation of nanofluid radiation and natural convection in an enclosure with elliptical cylinders. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;115:981–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramezanpour M, Siavashi M. Application of SiO2–water nanofluid to enhance oil recovery. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(1):565–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xuan Y, Li Q. Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2000;21(1):58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahian O, et al. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows-Part I: fundamentals and theory. Phys Rep. 2019;790:1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahian O, et al. Recent advances in modeling and simulation of nanofluid flows—Part II: applications. Phys Rep. 2019;791:1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy NC. Natural convection of nanofluids in a square enclosure with different shapes of inner geometry. Phys Fluids. 2018;30(11):113605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abu-Nada E, Masoud Z, Hijazi A. Natural convection heat transfer enhancement in horizontal concentric annuli using nanofluids. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2008;35(5):657–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aminossadati SM, Ghasemi B. Enhanced natural convection in an isosceles triangular enclosure filled with a nanofluid. Comput Math Appl. 2011;61(7):1739–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ho CJ, et al. Natural convection heat transfer of alumina-water nanofluid in vertical square enclosures: an experimental study. Int J Therm Sci. 2010;49(8):1345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garmroodi MD, Ahmadpour A, Talati F. MHD mixed convection of nanofluids in the presence of multiple rotating cylinders in different configurations: a two-phase numerical study. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;150:247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. Conjugate mixed convection of nanofluid in a cubic enclosure separated with a conductive plate and having an inner rotating cylinder. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;139:1000–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. Analysis and predictive modeling of nanofluid-jet impingement cooling of an isothermal surface under the influence of a rotating cylinder. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;121:233–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghasemi K, Siavashi M. Three-dimensional analysis of magnetohydrodynamic transverse mixed convection of nanofluid inside a lid-driven enclosure using MRT-LBM. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;165:105199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siavashi M, et al. Numerical analysis of mixed convection of two-phase non-Newtonian nanofluid flow inside a partially porous square enclosure with a rotating cylinder. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137(1):267–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bozorg MV, Siavashi M. Two-phase mixed convection heat transfer and entropy generation analysis of a non-Newtonian nanofluid inside a cavity with internal rotating heater and cooler. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;151:842–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siavashi M, Rostami A. Two-phase simulation of non-Newtonian nanofluid natural convection in a circular annulus partially or completely filled with porous media. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;133:689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD. External magnetic field effects on hydrothermal treatment of nanofluid: numerical and analytical studies. Amsterdam: William Andrew; 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. Numerical study and POD-based prediction of natural convection in a ferrofluids-filled triangular cavity with generalized neural networks. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2015;67(10):1136–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakatsuka K, et al. The magnetic fluid for heat transfer applications. J Magn Magn Mater. 2002;252:360–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shuchi S, Sakatani K, Yamaguchi H. An application of a binary mixture of magnetic fluid for heat transport devices. J Magn Magn Mater. 2005;289:257–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Selimefendigil F, Chamkha AJ. Magnetohydrodynamics mixed convection in a lid-driven cavity having a corrugated bottom wall and filled with a non-Newtonian power-law fluid under the influence of an inclined magnetic field. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2016;8(2):021023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. Forced convection in a branching channel with partly elastic walls and inner L-shaped conductive obstacle under the influence of magnetic field. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;144:118598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. MHD Pulsating forced convection of nanofluid over parallel plates with blocks in a channel. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;157–158:726–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moraveji MK, Hejazian M. Natural convection in a rectangular enclosure containing an oval-shaped heat source and filled with Fe3O4/water nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2013;44:135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kefayati GHR. Natural convection of ferrofluid in a linearly heated cavity utilizing LBM. J Mol Liq. 2014;191:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF, Al-Salem K. Natural convection of ferrofluids in partially heated square enclosures. J Magn Magn Mater. 2014;372:122–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joubert J, et al. Enhancement in heat transfer of a ferrofluid in a differentially heated square cavity through the use of permanent magnets. J Magn Magn Mater. 2017;443:149–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sun X-H, et al. Natural convection and anisotropic heat transfer in a ferro-nanofluid under magnetic field. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;133:581–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maghsoudi P, Siavashi M. Application of nanofluid and optimization of pore size arrangement of heterogeneous porous media to enhance mixed convection inside a two-sided lid-driven cavity. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(2):947–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Siavashi M, Miri Joibary SM. Numerical performance analysis of a counter-flow double-pipe heat exchanger with using nanofluid and both sides partly filled with porous media. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(2):1595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Siavashi M, Rasam H, Izadi A. Similarity solution of air and nanofluid impingement cooling of a cylindrical porous heat sink. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(2):1399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chamkha AJ, Selimefendigil F, Ismael MA. Mixed convection in a partially layered porous cavity with an inner rotating cylinder. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2016;69(6):659–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF. Magnetic field effects on the forced convection of CuO-water nanofluid flow in a channel with circular cylinders and thermal predictions using ANFIS. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;146–147:9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Javed T, Mehmood Z, Abbas Z. Natural convection in square cavity filled with ferrofluid saturated porous medium in the presence of uniform magnetic field. Physica B. 2017;506:122–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Astanina MS, et al. MHD natural convection and entropy generation of ferrofluid in an open trapezoidal cavity partially filled with a porous medium. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;136:493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gibanov NS, et al. Effect of uniform inclined magnetic field on natural convection and entropy generation in an open cavity having a horizontal porous layer saturated with a ferrofluid. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl. 2017;72(6):479–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pekmen Geridonmez B, Oztop HF. Natural convection in a cavity filled with porous medium under the effect of a partial magnetic field. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;161-162:105077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ghasemian M, et al. Heat transfer characteristics of Fe3O4 ferrofluid flowing in a mini channel under constant and alternating magnetic fields. J Magn Magn Mater. 2015;381:158–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nithiarasu P, Seetharamu K, Sundararajan T. Natural convective heat transfer in a fluid saturated variable porosity medium. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1997;40(16):3955–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Khanafer K, Vafai K, Lightstone M. Buoyancy-driven heat transfer enhancement in a two-dimensional enclosure utilizing nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2003;46(19):3639–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brinkman H. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J Chem Phys. 1952;20(4):571–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Maxwell JC. A treatise on electricity and magnetism, vol. 314. Oxford: Clarendon; 1881. p. 1873.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Scarpa F, Smith FC. Passive and MR fluid-coated auxetic PU foam—mechanical, acoustic, and electromagnetic properties. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2004;15(12):973–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ganguly R, Sen S, Puri IK. Heat transfer augmentation using a magnetic fluid under the influence of a line dipole. J Magn Magn Mater. 2004;271(1):63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Khezzar L, Siginer D, Vinogradov I. Natural convection of power law fluids in inclined cavities. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;53:8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Minakov AV, Rudyak VY, Pryazhnikov MI. About rheology of nanofluids. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing; 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations