Advertisement

A polyolefin encapsulant material designed for photovoltaic modules: from perspectives of peel strength and transmittance

  • Bo LinEmail author
  • Chen ZhengEmail author
  • Qingying Zhu
  • Fang Xie
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

A secondary master batch process had been applied to design a polyolefin encapsulant material for photovoltaic modules, in which the polymer blend was composed of polyolefin elastomer (POE) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) with the addition of the cross-linking agent of tert-butylperoxy 2-ethylhexyl carbonate (TBEC) and silane coupling agent of γ-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane (KH570). The rheological property from Haake torque rheometer illuminated that the chemical cross-linking reaction could take place between the POE and TBEC. The LLDPE was added for further increasing the cohesion of polymer blend by obtaining much more physical cross-linking points from the physical entanglement between the flexible chains of LLDPE and the amorphous zone of POE. However, the transmittance of polymer blend ran down with the rise of LLDPE content within the polymer blend. The number and site of melting points of polymer blend by the DSC analysis show that there was compatibility between the POE and LLDPE within the polymer blend; meanwhile, the resultant molecular structures of the polymer blend also had been explained by the FTIR spectra. These results unanimously illuminated that it was a feasible solution for fabricating the polyolefin encapsulant material for photovoltaic modules.

Keywords

Polyolefin elastomer Polymer blend Rheological property Transmittance Peel strength 

Notes

Acknowledgements

B.L. gratefully acknowledged for financial supports from the professorial and doctoral scientific research foundation of Huizhou University (Grant No. 2018JB001) and the Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2017A030313080).

References

  1. 1.
    Hsu HY, Hsieh HH, Tuan HY, Hwang JL. Oxidized low density polyethylene: a potential cost-effective, stable, and recyclable polymeric encapsulant for photovoltaic modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2010;94:955–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2010.01.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zweibel K. Thin film PV manufacturing: materials costs and their optimization. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2000;63:375–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00057-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pan K, Zeng X, Li H, Lai X, Huang J. Synthesis of an adhesion-enhancing polyhydrosiloxane containing acrylate groups and its cross-linked addition-cure silicone encapsulant. J Elastom Plast. 2013;47:416–30.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0095244313514992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pan K, Zeng X, Li H, Lai X. Synthesis of siloxanes containing vinyl and epoxy group and its enhancement for adhesion of addition-cure silicone encapsulant. J Macromol Sci A. 2013;50:1126–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2013.829361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hintersteiner I, Sternbauer L, Beissmann S, Buchberger WW, Wallner GM. Determination of stabilisers in polymeric materials used as encapsulants in photovoltaic modules. Polym Test. 2014;33:172–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Snaith HJ, Hacke P. Enabling reliability assessments of pre-commercial perovskite photovoltaics with lessons learned from industrial standards. Nat Energy. 2018;3:459–65.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0174-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tábi T. The application of the synergistic effect between the crystal structure of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and the presence of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) to produce highly ductile PLA/EVA blends. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08184-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang G, Wu W, Dong H, Wang Y, Qu H, Xu J. Synergistic flame-retardant effects of aluminum phosphate and Trimer in ethylene–vinyl acetate composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132:919–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7026-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peike C, Hülsmann P, Blüml M, Schmid P, Weiß KA, Köhl M. Impact of permeation properties and backsheet-encapsulant interactions on the reliability of PV modules. ISRN Renew Energy. 2012.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/459731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luo W, Khoo YS, Hacke P, Naumann V, Lausch D, Harvey SP, Singh JP, Chai J, Wang Y, Aberle AG, Ramakrishna S. Potential-induced degradation in photovoltaic modules: a critical review. Energy Environ Sci. 2017;10:43–68.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE02271E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferrada P, Marzo A, Cabrera E, Chu H, Campo V, Rabanal J, Diaz-Almeida D, Schneider A, Kopecek R. Potential for photogenerated current for silicon based photovoltaic modules in the Atacama Desert. Sol Energy. 2017;144:580–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ottersböck B, Oreski G, Pinter G. Comparison of different microclimate effects on the aging behavior of encapsulation materials used in photovoltaic modules. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2017;138:182–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mochane MJ, Mokhena TC, Motaung TE, Linganiso LZ. Shape-stabilized phase change materials of polyolefin/wax blends and their composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08734-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wen X, Szymańska K, Chen X, Mijowska E. Nanosized carbon black as synergist in PP/POE-MA/IFR system for simultaneously improving thermal, electrical and mechanical properties. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08466-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    López-Escalante MC, Caballero LJ, Martín Gabás FM, Cuevas A, Ramos-Barrado JR. Polyolefin as PID-resistant encapsulant material in PV modules. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2016;144:691–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oliveira MCC, Cardoso ASAD, Viana MM, Freitas Cunha Lins V. The causes and effects of degradation of encapsulant ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81:2299–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    López-Escalante MC, Fernández-Rodríguez M, Caballero LJ, Martína F, Gabás M, Ramos-Barrado JR. Novel encapsulant architecture on the road to photovoltaic module power output increase. Appl Energy. 2018;228:1901–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Omazic A, Oreski G, Halwachs M, Eder GC, Hirschl C, Neumaier CL, Pinter G, Erceg M. Relation between degradation of polymeric components in crystalline silicon PV module and climatic conditions: a literature review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2019;192:123–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.12.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Materials EngineeringHuizhou UniversityHuizhouChina
  2. 2.Glorious Sun Guangdong School of FashionHuizhou UniversityHuizhouChina
  3. 3.Guangzhou Lushan New Materials Co., LtdGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations