Advertisement

Chemical structure of soil organic matter

Stabilization by adsorbed water and connection to content of organic carbon, nitrogen, and clay minerals
  • Jiří KučeríkEmail author
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Selective preservation belongs among the important stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter (SOM). Conceptually, it is based on non-covalent intermolecular interactions of organic molecules, which leads to a decrease in the Gibbs’ energy of the SOM structure. Earlier works suggested that this stabilization of SOM physical structure is supported also by water molecules that form clusters bridging SOM moieties. This article reports results suggesting that water is connected also to stabilization of SOM chemical structure. We analyzed the dynamics and composition of gases evolved during drying of 33 mineral soils, which were exposed to 40% relative humidity prior to the analysis. It was observed that moisture elimination occurring below 100 °C is accompanied by evolution of a small amount of low molecular mass gases representing typical degradation products of organic materials. In particular, analyses revealed the evolution of CO, HCN, NO, and probably traces of NH3 and CO2, which implied degradation of N-containing molecules. The peak temperature of evolved CO correlated with the amount of adsorbed water. The amount of evolved CO positively correlated with the amount total organic C and N contents and clay content. On the contrary, the amount of CO evolved during degradation did not correlate with the amount of CO2 produced during incubation of analyzed soils either at short or longer incubation times. Evolution of gases started and culminated simultaneously with drying. The analysis of soils exposed to higher relative humidity levels resulted in a shift of the CO peaks to higher temperatures. Therefore, the results suggested a possible causality between water desorption at elevated temperature and SOM degradation processes.

Keywords

Stability Soil organic matter Water Selective preservation N-containing molecules Evolved gas analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support acquired within the FCH-S-19-5971 projects of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic is acknowledged. Furthermore, the author thanks Professor Christian Siewert, University of Applied Sciences Dresden, Germany, for fruitful discussion and former colleagues from University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany, in particular Professor Gabriele E. Schaumann, for valuable advice and Mr. Andreas Hirsch for conducting some laboratory experiments.

Supplementary material

10973_2019_8802_MOESM1_ESM.docx (91 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 91 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lal R, Lorenz K, Hüttl RF, Schneider BU, von Braun J. Terrestrial biosphere as a source and sink of atmospheric carbon dioxide. In: Lal R, Lorenz K, Hüttl RF, Schneider BU, von Braun J, editors. Recarbonization Biosph. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittma T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature. 2011;478:49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wiesmeier M, Urbanski L, Hobley E, Lang B, von Lützow M, Marin-Spiotta E, et al. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils—a review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma. 2019;333:149–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wagai R, Mayer LM. Sorptive stabilization of organic matter in soils by hydrous iron oxides. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2007;71:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeasmin S, Singh B, Johnston CT, Sparks DL. Organic carbon characteristics in density fractions of soils with contrasting mineralogies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2017;218:215–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sollins P, Homann P, Caldwell BA, Swanston EC, Kramer EM. Stabilization and destabilization of soil organic matter. Geoderma. 1996;74:65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lützow MV, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, et al. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions—a review. Eur J Soil Sci. 2006;57:426–45.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00809.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conte P. Biochar, soil fertility, and environment. Biol Fertil Soils. 2014;50:1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuzyakov Y, Merino A, Pereira P. Ash and fire, char, and biochar in the environment. L Degrad Dev. 2018;29:2040–4.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piccolo A. The supramolecular structure of humic substances: a novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv Agron. 2002;75:57–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu W-G, Mao J, Xing B, Schmidt-Rohr K. Poly(methylene) crystallites in humic substances detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. Environ Sci Technol. 2000;34:530–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chilom G, Rice JA. Glass transition and crystallite melting in natural organic matter. Org Geochem. 2005;36:1339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen XF, Ju WM, Chen JM, Ren LL. Interactions between terrestrial ecosystem water and carbon cycles and their simulation methods: a review. Chin J Ecol. 2009;28:1630–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Kunhikrishnan A, James T, McDowell R, Senesi N. Dissolved organic matter: biogeochemistry, dynamics, and environmental significance in soils. Adv Agron. 2011;110:1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen B, Coops NC. Understanding of coupled terrestrial carbon nitrogen and water dynamics-an overview. Sensors. 2009;9:8624–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Likens GE, Bormann FH, Johnson NM. Interactions between major biogeochemical cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Likens GE, editor. Some perspect major biogeochem cycles. Chichester: Wiley; 1981. p. 93–112.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Potts M. Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58:755–805.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tisdall JM, Oades JM. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci. 1982;33:141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borisover M. The effect of organic sorbates on water associated with environmentally important sorbents: estimating and the LFER analysis. Adsorption. 2013;19(2–4):241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borisover M, Graber ER. Simplified link solvation model (LSM) for sorption in natural organic matter. Langmuir. 2002;18:4775–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Borisover M, Graber ER. Hydration of natural organic matter: effect on sorption of organic compounds by natural organic matter fractions vs natural organic matter source material. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:4120–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agam N, Berliner PR. Dew formation and water vapor adsorption in semi-arid environments—a review. J Arid Environ. 2006;65:572–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McHugh TA, Morrissey EM, Reed SC, Hungate BA, Schwartz E. Water from air: an overlooked source of moisture in arid and semiarid regions. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13767.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stovicek A, Kim M, Or D, Gillor O, Štovíček A, Kim M, et al. Microbial community response to hydration-desiccation cycles in desert soil. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Williams CA, Albertson JD. Contrasting short- and long-timescale effects of vegetation dynamics on water and carbon fluxes in water-limited ecosystems. Water Resour Res. 2005.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003750.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vásquez-Méndez R, Ventura-Ramos E, Oleschko K, Hernández-Sandoval L, Domínguez-Cortázar MA. Soil erosion processes in semiarid areas: the importance of native vegetation. Danilo G Soil Eros Stud Shanghai InTech. 2011;1:25–41.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lopez-Capel E, Abbott GD, Thomas KM, Manning DAC. Coupling of thermal analysis with quadrupole mass spectrometry and isotope ratio mass spectrometry for simultaneous determination of evolved gases and their carbon isotopic composition. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2006;75:82–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lopez-Capel E, Bol R, Manning DAC. Application of simultaneous thermal analysis mass spectrometry and stable carbon isotope analysis in a carbon sequestration study. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:3192–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Manning DAC, Lopez-Capel E, Barker S. Seeing soil carbon: use of thermal analysis in the characterization of soil C reservoirs of differing stability. Miner Magnes. 2005;69:425–36.  https://doi.org/10.1180/0026461056940260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Manning DAC, Lopez-Capel E, White ML, Barker S. Carbon isotope determination for separate components of heterogeneous materials using coupled thermogravimetric analysis/isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22:1187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Demyan MS, Rasche F, Schütt M, Smirnova N, Schulz E, Cadisch G. Combining a coupled FTIR-EGA system and in situ DRIFTS for studying soil organic matter in arable soils. Biogeosciences. 2013;10:2897–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang Y, Lu S, Ren T, Li B. Bound water content of air-dry soils measured by thermal analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011;75:481–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Degrendele CC, Audy OO, Hofman J, Kučerik J, Kukučka P, Mulder MD, et al. Diurnal variations of air-soil exchange of semivolatile organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs, OCPs, and PBDEs) in a central European receptor area. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:4278–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Insam H, Seewald MSA. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 2010;46:199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karathanasis AD, Hajek BF. Quantitative evaluation of water adsorption on soil clays. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1982;46:1321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Diehl D, Schwarz J, Goebel MO, Woche SK, Schneckenburger T, Krüger J, et al. Effect of multivalent cations, temperature, and aging on SOM thermal properties. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:1203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aquino AJA, Tunega D, Schaumann GE, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH, Lischka H. Stabilizing capacity of water bridges in nanopore segments of humic substances: a theoretical investigation. J Phys Chem C. 2009;113:16468–75.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9054796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hurrass J, Schaumann GE. Influence of the sample history and the moisture status on the thermal behavior of soil organic matter. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2007;71:691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schaumann GE, Bertmer M. Do water molecules bridge soil organic matter molecule segments? Eur J Soil Sci. 2008;59:423–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00959.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kunhi Mouvenchery Y, Jaeger A, Aquino AJA, Tunega D, Diehl D, Bertmer M, et al. Restructuring of a peat in interaction with multivalent cations: effect of cation type and aging time. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65359.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mouvenchery YK, Kučerík J, Diehl D, Schaumann GE, Kunhi Mouvenchery Y, Kučerík J, et al. Cation-mediated cross-linking in natural organic matter: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2012;11:41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9258-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jaeger A, Schwarz J, Kunhi Mouvenchery Y, Schaumann GE, Bertmer M, Jäger A, et al. Physical long term regeneration dynamics of soil organic matter as followed by 1H solid-state NMR methods. Environ Chem. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1071/en14216.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Siewert C, Kučerík J. Practical applications of thermogravimetry in soil science: Part 3: I interrelations between soil components and unifying principles of pedogenesis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;120:471–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4256-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moldoveanu SC. Pyrolysis of amino acids and small peptides. In: Moldoveanu SC, editor. Pyrolysis org mol with appl to heal environ issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2010. p. 527–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Moldoveanu SCC. Pyrolysis of amines and imines. Tech Instrum Anal Chem. 2010;4:349–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Spinoni J, Naumann G, Carrao H, Barbosa P, Vogt J. World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010. Int J Clim. 2014;34:2792–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kucerik J, Ctvrtnickova A, Siewert C. Practical application of thermogravimetry in soil science: part 1. Thermal and biological stability of soils from contrasting regions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113:1103–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-012-2849-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Plante AF, Pernes M, Chenu C. Changes in clay-associated organic matter quality in a C depletion sequence as measured by differential thermal analyses. Geoderma. 2005;129:186–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    David J, Steinmetz Z, Kucerik J, Schaumann GE. Quantitative analysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) microplastics in soil via thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2018;90(15):8793–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hotová G, Slovák V. Quantitative TG-MS analysis of evolved gases during the thermal decomposition of carbon containing solids. Thermochim Acta. 2016;632:23–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hotová G, Slovák V. Determination of the surface oxidation degree of the carbonaceous materials by quantitative TG-MS analysis. Anal Chem. 2017;89:1710–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Miller WP, Miller DM. A micro-pipette method for soil mechanical analysis. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 1987;18:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628709367799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Smirnova N, Demyan MS, Rasche F, Cadisch G, Müller T. Calibration of CO2 trapping in alkaline solutions during soil incubation at varying temperatures using a respicond VI. Open J Soil Sci. 2014;4:161–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Materazzi S, Vecchio S. Evolved gas analysis by mass spectrometry. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2011;46:261–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kučerík J, Siewert C. Practical application of thermogravimetry in soil science part 2 Modelling and predicton of soil respiration using thermal mass losses. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;116:563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Siewert C, Demyan MS, Kučerík J. Interrelations between soil respiration and its thermal stability. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;110:413–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2099-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mikutta R, Kleber M, Kaiser K, Jahn R. Review: organic matter removal from soils using hydrogen peroxide. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2005;69:120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Theng BKG, Churchman GJ, Newman RH. The occurrence of interlayer clay-organic complexes in two New-Zealand soils. Soil Sci. 1986;142:262–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kögel-Knabner I, Guggenberger G, Kleber M, Kandeler E, Kalbitz K, Scheu S, et al. Organo-mineral associations in temperate soils: integrating biology, mineralogy, and organic matter chemistry. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2008;171:61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schmidt MWI, Noack AG. Black carbon in soils andsediments: analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges. Glob Biogeochem Cycl. 2000;14:777–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dorodnikov M, Fangmeier A, Giesemann A, Weigel HJ, Stahr K, Kuzyakov Y, et al. Thermal stability of soil organic matter pools and their turnover times calculated by δ13C under elevated CO2and two levels of N fertilisation. Isot Environ Health Stud. 2008;44:365–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schulten H-R, Leinweber P. Characterization of humic and soil particles by analytical pyrolysis and computer modeling. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1996;38:1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Plante AF, Fernández JM, Leifeld J. Application of thermal analysis techniques in soil science. Geoderma. 2009;153:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Olszak-Humienik M. On the thermal stability of some ammonium salts. Thermochim Acta. 2001;378:107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Warren CR. Quaternary ammonium compounds can be abundant in some soils and are taken up as intact molecules by plants. New Phytol. 2013;198:476–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kleber M, Sollins P, Sutton R. A conceptual model of organo-mineral interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal structures on mineral surfaces. Biogeochemistry. 2007;85:9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rillig MC, Caldwell BA, Wösten HAB, Sollins P. Role of proteins in soil carbon and nitrogen storage: controls on persistence. Biogeochemistry. 2007;85:25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Knicker H. How does fire affect the nature and stability of soil organic nitrogen and carbon? A review. Biogeochemistry. 2007;85:91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moldoveanu SC. Nucleic acids. In: Analytical pyrolysis of natural organic polymers, chap. 13. Techniques and Instrumentation in Analytical Chemistry Series, vol. 20; 1998. p. 399–408.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Schulten HR. Three dimensional molecular structures of humic acids and their interactions with water and dissolved contaminants. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 1996;64:147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Leinweber P, Schulten HR. Advances in analytical pyrolysis of soil organic matter. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 1999;49:359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Moldoveanu SCC. Pyrolysis of carboxylic acids. In: Moldoveanu SC, editor. Pyrolysis of organic molecules: applications to health and environmental issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010. p. 471–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Treseder KK, Turner KM. Glomalin in ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2007;71:1257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wright SF, Upadhyaya A. Extraction of an abundant and unusual protein from soil and comparison with hyphal protein of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Sci. 1996;161:575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Knicker H. Soil organic N—an under-rated player for C sequestration in soils? Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:1118–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Costard R, Greve C, Heisler IA, Elsaesser T. Ultrafast energy redistribution in local hydration shells of phospholipids: a two-dimensional infrared study. J Phys Chem Lett. 2012;3:3646–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rasmussen C, Southard RJ, Horwath WR. Modeling energy inputs to predict pedogenic environments using regional environmental databases. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2005;69:1266–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Environmental ProtectionBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations