Advertisement

Release characteristics of gaseous products during CO2 gasification of char

  • Shenxian Xian
  • Haixia Zhang
  • Zhen Chai
  • Zhiping ZhuEmail author
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

We investigated the release behaviors and reaction reactivities of gaseous products during CO2 gasification of three chars (Guanghui char, Hongshagang char, and Shenmu char) and graphite using thermogravimetric–mass spectrometry. The three chars with different sulfur contents had similar release behaviors. CO was the primary gaseous product, while SO2 was the main gaseous sulfur product. CO forms through the reaction between carbon and CO2. The temperature ranges at which H2 and COS evolved are similar to that of CO, and both H2S and SO2 were released at around 1100 °C. For the same gas, the differences in release behaviors were mainly due to the reactivity of the evolution reactions. Alkali mineral species had a catalytic effect on char gasification, while the increasing degree of graphitization tended to increase gasification reaction resistance. Larger surface area resulted in decreased reaction resistance at the initial stage of the gasification reaction. The most important factor influencing sulfur release reactivity was gasification activity rather than sulfur species in char. Moreover, acidic minerals may accelerate the release of sulfur.

Keywords

Char Gasification TG–MS Evolution behaviors Reaction reactivity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFB0602302) and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (No. Z181100005118006).

References

  1. 1.
    Society CER. China energy outlook 2030. In: House EMP, editor. Bejing2016.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kok MV, Yildirim B. Gasification profiles of Thrace region coal under CO2, N2/CO2, and N2/DRY air environments. J Pet Sci Eng. 2019;175:237–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leeuw KA, Strydom CA, Bunt JR, van Niekerk D. The influence of K2CO3 and KCl on H2 formation during heat treatment of an acid-treated inertinite-rich bituminous coal-char. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;126(2):905–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5597-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang Y, Zong P, Tian B, Xu F, Tian Y, Qiao Y, et al. Pyrolysis behaviors and product distribution of Shenmu coal at high heating rate: a study using TG–FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;179:72–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X, Si J, Tan H, Ma L, Pourkashanian M, Xu T. Nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine transformations during the pyrolysis of straw. Energy Fuels. 2010;24(9):5215–21.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1007215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xia H, Wei K. Equivalent characteristic spectrum analysis in TG–MS system. Thermochim Acta. 2015;602:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2014.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin Y, Huang Q, Wei K, Xia H. Quantitative study on adsorption and regeneration characteristics of activated coke using equivalent characteristic spectrum analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2019;58(12):5080–6.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin Y, Zheng M, Ye C, Power IM. Thermogravimetric analysis–mass spectrometry (TGA–MS) of hydromagnesite from Dujiali Lake in Tibet, China. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133(3):1429–37.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7197-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Justh N, Berke B, László K, Szilágyi IM. Thermal analysis of the improved Hummers’ synthesis of graphene oxide. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131(3):2267–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6697-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhao B, Jin J, Li S, Liu D, Zhang R, Yang H. Co-pyrolysis characteristics of sludge mixed with Zhundong coal and sulphur contaminant release regularity. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08300-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang QWK, Xia H. Investigations in the recrystallization of evolved gases from pyrolysis process of melamine. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08338-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qian H, Kai W, Hongde X. A novel perspective of dolomite decomposition: elementary reactions analysis by thermogravimetric mass spectrometry. Thermochim Acta. 2019;676:47–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.03.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fan D, Zhu Z, Na Y, Lu Q. Thermogravimetric analysis of gasification reactivity of coal chars with steam and CO2 at moderate temperatures. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113(2):599–607.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-012-2838-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song HJ, Liu GR, Zhang JZ, Wu JH. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of low rank coals by TG–FTIR method. Fuel Process Technol. 2017;156:454–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fidalgo B, Menendez JÁ. Carbon materials as catalysts for decomposition and CO2 reforming of methane: a review. Chin J Catal. 2011;32(1–2):207–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(10)60166-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gee SY, Chang SK, Park HL. Oxidation processes in CAS and the binding-energy of S2p in CASO4. Phys Status Solidi A Appl Res. 1991;125(2):K89–91.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211250241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang LJ, Li ZH, Yang YL, Zhou YB, Li JH, Si LL, et al. Research on the composition and distribution of organic sulfur in coal. Molecules. 2016;21(5):13.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang H, Xu M, Hu H, Yang F, Yang Y, Liu H, et al. In-situ removal of sulfur from high sulfur solid waste during molten salt pyrolysis. Fuel. 2018;231:489–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang Y, Wang M, Qin Z, Yang Y, Fu C, Feng L, et al. Effect of the interactions between volatiles and char on sulfur transformation during brown coal upgrade by pyrolysis. Fuel. 2013;103:915–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blasing M, Muller M. Release of alkali metal, sulphur, and chlorine species from high temperature gasification of high- and low-rank coals. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;106:289–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.08.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang X, Guo H, Liu F, Hua R, Wang M. Effects of CO2 on sulfur removal and its release behavior during coal pyrolysis. Fuel. 2016;165:484–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qiu K, Anthony EJ, Jia L. Oxidation of sulfided limestone under the conditions of pressurized fluidized bed combustion. Fuel. 2001;80(4):549–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-2361(00)00128-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo L, Zuo H, Wang Y, Zhao J. Thermal behavior and kinetic study on the pyrolysis of lean coal blends with thermally dissolved coal. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136(2):903–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7719-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wako FM, Reshad AS, Goud VV. Thermal degradation kinetics study and thermal cracking of waste cooking oil for biofuel production. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131(3):2157–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6760-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fang W. Study on reaction kinetic of steam-coal chars gasification with TGA. J China Coal Soc. 2004;29(03):350–3.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chunxia X, Zhengang X, Xuepeng B, Weiguo D. Characteristic study on the co-gasification of coal chars with CO2 and steam. J China Coal Soc. 2009;34(07):952–6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhao H, Cao Y, Orndorff W, Pan W-P. Gasification characteristics of coal char under CO2 atmosphere. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;116(3):1267–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3627-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hou A, Wang Z, Song W, Lin W. Thermogravimetric analysis on gasification reactivity of Hailar lignite influence of inherent mineral matters and external ash. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109(1):337–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1712-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Duman G, Uddin MA, Yanik J. The effect of char properties on gasification reactivity. Fuel Process Technol. 2014;118:75–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhan X, Jia J, Zhou Z, Wang F. Influence of blending methods on the co-gasification reactivity of petroleum coke and lignite. Energy Convers Manag. 2011;52(4):1810–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bai Y, Lv P, Yang X, Gao M, Zhu S, Yan L, et al. Gasification of coal char in H2O/CO2 atmospheres: evolution of surface morphology and pore structure. Fuel. 2018;218:236–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anthony EJ, Jia L, Qiu K. CaS Oxidation by Reaction with CO2 and H2O. Energy Fuels. 2003;17(2):363–8.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020124s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhou Y, Li S, Li P, Kong Y, Zhao H. Sulfur-retention characteristics of different coal mixtures. J Power Eng. 2012;32(3):217–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Attar A. Chemistry, thermodynamics and kinetics of reactions of sulfur in coal-gas reactions: review. Fuel. 1978;57(4):201–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(78)90117-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shenxian Xian
    • 1
    • 2
  • Haixia Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhen Chai
    • 1
  • Zhiping Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering ThermophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations