Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 139, Issue 2, pp 1291–1299 | Cite as

Framing the novel aspects of irreversibilty in MHD flow of Williamson nanomaterial with thermal radiation near stagnation point

  • M. Ijaz KhanEmail author
  • Sumaira Qayyum
  • M. Waqas
  • T. Hayat
  • A. Alsaedi
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Here, MHD stagnation point flow of non-Newtonian fluid over a stretchable surface is considered. Process of modeling is characterized for basic relations of non-Newtonian Williamson fluid. Nanofeatures for thermophoresis and random movement of liquid particles present. Applied magnetic field for small Reynolds number is considered. Induced magnetic field is not accounted. Entropy equation is studied in the presence of Ohmic heating, radiation and dissipation. The carried out analysis reduces the PDE systems into the ODE systems with nonlinearity. The obtained nonlinear ODE systems are solved utilizing modern way of solution technique known as the built-in-Shooting method. Furthermore, total entropy rate is calculated via second law of thermodynamics. Velocity, entropy rate, temperature, Nusselt number, mass concentration, skin friction and Sherwood number are discussed through different physical parameters. Key observations of the whole study are listed.

Keywords

MHD Williamson nanofluid Activation energy Entropy generation Viscous dissipation Radiative heat flux Ohmic heating 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Sun HG, Zhang Y, Baleanu D, Chen W, Chen YQ. A new collection of real world applications of fractional calculus in science and engineering. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2018;64:213–31.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Farooq M, Alsaedi A, Waqas M, Yasmeen T. Impact of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model in flow of variable thermal conductivity fluid over a variable thicked surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2016;99:702–10.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Farooq M, Yasmeen T, Alsaedi A. Stagnation point flow with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux and homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. J Mol Liq. 2016;220:45–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khandavalli S, Rothstein JP. Ink transfer of non-Newtonian fluids from an idealized gravure cell: the effect of shear and extensional deformation. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2017;243:16.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marschik C, Roland W, Löw-Baselli B, Miethlinger J. A heuristic method for modeling three-dimensional non-Newtonian flows of polymer melts in single-screw extruders. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2017;248:27–39.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turkyilmazoglu M. Analytical solutions to mixed convection MHD fluid flow induced by a nonlinearly deforming permeable surface. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2018;63:373–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan MI, Waqas M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. A comparative study of Casson fluid with homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;498:85–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khan NB, Ibrahim Z, Khan MI, Hayat T, Javed MF. VIV study of an elastically mounted cylinder having low mass-damping ratio using RANS model. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;121:309–14.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hsiao KL. To promote radiation electrical MHD activation energy thermal extrusion manufacturing system efficiency by using Carreau-Nanofluid with parameters control method. Energy. 2017;130:486–99.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan MI, Waqas M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. Significance of nonlinear radiation in mixed convection flow of magneto Walter-B nanoliquid. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2017;42:26408–16.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Qayyum S, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. New thermodynamics of entropy generation minimization with nonlinear thermal radiation and nanomaterials. Phys Lett A. 2018;382:749–60.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsiao KL. Combined electrical MHD heat transfer thermal extrusion system using Maxwell fluid with radiative and viscous dissipation effects. Appl Thermal Eng. 2017;112:1281–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tamoor M, Waqas M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A, Hayat T. Magnetohydrodynamic flow of Casson fluid over a stretching cylinder. ResultsPhys. 2017;7:498–502.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsiao KL. Micropolar nanofluid flow with MHD and viscous dissipation effects towards a stretching sheet with multimedia feature. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;112:983–90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waqas M, Khan MI, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. Nonlinear thermal radiation in flow induced by a slendering surface accounting thermophoresis and Brownian diffusion. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132:280.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayat T, Khan MWA, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. Squeezing flow of second grade liquid subject to non-Fourier heat flux and heat generation/absorption. Colloid Polymer Sci. 2017;295:967–75.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayat T, Qayyum S, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Modern developments about statistical declaration and probable error for skin friction and Nusselt number with copper and silver nanoparticles. Chin J Phys. 2017;55:2501–13.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsiao KL. Stagnation electrical MHD nanofluid mixed convection with slip boundary on a stretching sheet. Appl Thermal Eng. 2016;98:850–61.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turkyilmazoglu M. Buongiorno model in a nanofluid filled asymmetric channel fulfilling zero net particle flux at the walls. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:974–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reddy GJ, Raju RS, Rao GA. Influence of viscous dissipation on unsteady MHD natural convective flow of Casson fluid over an oscillating vertical plate via FEM. Ain Sham Eng J. 2018;9:1907–15.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khan MI, Sumaira S, Hayat T, Waqas M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Entropy generation minimization and binary chemical reaction with Arrhenius activation energy in MHD radiative flow of nanomaterial. J Mol Liq. 2018;259:274–83.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan MI, Waqas M, Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Numerical simulation of nonlinear thermal radiation and homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in convective flow by a variable thicked surface. J Mol Liq. 2017;246:259–67.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Esfe MH, Rejvani M, Karimpour R, Arani AAA. Estimation of thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol-based nanofluid with hybrid suspensions of SWCNT–Al2O3 nanoparticles by correlation and ANN methods using experimental data. J Therm Anal Calorimet. 2017;128:1359–71.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turkyilmazoglu M. Fluid flow and heat transfer over a rotating and vertically moving disk. Phys Fluid. 2018;30:063605.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Antonovič V, Kerienė J, Spudulis E, Stonys R, Boris R. Investigation of ageing of alumina cement-based mixtures using thermal analysis and calorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorimet. 2017;130:35–44.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Williamson RV. The flow of pseudoplastic materials. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1929;1929(21):1108.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cramer SD, Marchello JM. Numerical evaluation of models describing non-Newtonian behavior. Am Inst Chem Eng J. 1968;14:980.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan MI, Hayat T, Waqas M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Entropy generation minimization (EGM) in nonlinear mixed convective flow of nanomaterial with Joule heating and slip condition. J Mol Liq. 2018;256:108–20.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turkyilmazoglu M. Equivalences and correspondences between the deforming body induced flow and heat in two-three dimensions. Phys Fluid. 2016;28:043102.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Khan MI, Ullah S, Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Entropy generation minimization (EGM) for convection nanomaterial flow with nonlinear radiative heat flux. J Mol Liq. 2018;260:279–91.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Turkyilmazoglu M. Convergence accelerating in the homotopy analysis method: a new approach. Adv Appl Math Mech. 2018;10:925–47.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khan MI, Qayyum S, Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A, Khan TA. Entropy generation in radiative motion of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid in presence of activation energy and nonlinear mixed convection. Phys Lett A. 2018;382:2017–26.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jahanbakhshi A, Nadooshan AA, Bayareh M. Magnetic field effects on natural convection flow of a non-Newtonian fluid in an L-shaped enclosure. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:1407–16.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu B, Zhang C, Chen C, Zhou J, Lu C, Ni Z. One-step synthesis of CuS-decorated MWCNTs/paraffin composite phase change materials and their light–heat conversion performance. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:1417–28.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. Joule heating and viscous dissipation in flow of nanomaterial by a rotating disk. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2017;89:190–7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ternik P. New contributions on laminar flow of inelastic non-Newtonian fluid in the two-dimensional symmetric expansion: creeping and slowly moving flow conditions. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2010;165:1400–11.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Imtiaz M, Alsaedi A. Heat and mass transfer analysis in the stagnation region of Maxwell fluid with chemical reaction over a stretched surface. J Therm Sci Eng Appl. 2018;10:011002.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khan MI, Waqas M, Hayat T, Alsaedi A. Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stagnation point flow of Casson fluid over a stretched surface with homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. J Theor Comput Chem. 2017;16:1750022.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Veiga HBD, Yang J. On the energy equality for solutions to Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Nonlinear Anal. 2019;185:388–402.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hayat T, Salman S, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Simulation of ferromagnetic nanomaterial flow of Maxwell fluid. Results Phys. 2018;8:34–40.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Silva KCD, Silva IDJD, Calçada LA, Scheid CM. The effect of previous sedimentation on the filtration and mudcake properties of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Powder Technol. 2019;346:9–16.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Khan MI, Yasmeen T, Khan MI, Farooq M, Wakeel M. Research progress in the development of natural gas as fuel for road vehicles: a bibliographic review (1991–2016). Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;66:702–41.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jiang XF, Zhu C, Li ZH. Bubble pinch-off in Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Chem Eng Sci. 2017;170:98–104.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Qayyum S, Alsaedi A. Entropy generation in flow with silver and copper nanoparticles. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspect. 2018;539:335–46.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kefayati GR, Tang H, Chan A, Wang X. A lattice Boltzmann model for thermal non-Newtonian fluid flows through porous media. Comput Fluid. 2018;176:226–44.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Khan MI, Hayat T, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Activation energy impact in nonlinear radiative stagnation point flow of Cross nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2018;91:216–24.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hayat T, Aslam N, Khan MI, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Physical significance of heat generation/absorption and Soret effects on peristalsis flow of pseudoplastic fluid in an inclined channel. J Mol Liq. 2019;275:599–615.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sheikholeslami M, Saleem S, Shafee A, Li Z, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Khan MI. Mesoscopic investigation for alumina nanofluid heat transfer in permeable medium influenced by Lorentz forces. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng. 2019;349:839–58.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hayat T, Muhammad K, Khan MI, Alsaedi A. Theoretical investigation of chemically reactive flow of water based carbon nanotubes with melting heat transfer. Pramana J Phys. 2019;92:57.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Khan MI, Hayat T, Khan MI, Waqas M, Alsaedi A. Numerical simulation of hydromagnetic mixed convective radiative slip flow with variable fluid properties: a mathematical model for entropy generation. J Phys Chem Solid. 2019;125:153–64.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yih KA. Free convection effect on MHD coupled heat and mass transfer of a moving permeable vertical surface. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 1999;26:95–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Ijaz Khan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sumaira Qayyum
    • 1
  • M. Waqas
    • 2
  • T. Hayat
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. Alsaedi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsQuaid-I-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.NUTECH School of Applied Sciences and HumanitiesNational University of TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM) Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations