Advertisement

Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 139, Issue 2, pp 833–838 | Cite as

Investigation of kaolin–quartz mixtures during heating using thermodilatometry and DC thermoconductometry

  • Ján OndruškaEmail author
  • Štefan Csáki
  • Igor Štubňa
  • Viera Trnovcová
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Temperature dependencies of the DC conductivity of mixtures of kaolin and quartz were measured in the temperature range of 20–1200 °C. During heating, several processes take place in the sample—release of the physically bound water (PBW), dehydroxylation of kaolinite, the α → β transition of quartz, and the creation of Al–Si spinel. These processes were studied using differential thermal analysis, thermogravimetry, thermodilatometry, and DC conductivity measurement. At temperatures < 200 °C, H+ and OH ions are the dominant charge carriers in the DC conductivity due to the release and dissociation of PBW. After the release of PBW, and up to the start of dehydroxylation (~ 500 °C), the DC conductivity is dominated by the transport of Na+ and K+ ions. During dehydroxylation, OH ions, which are released from the kaolinite lattice, contribute to the DC conductivity. However, the association of OH ions with mobile alkali metal ions into neutral complexes, as well as depletion of OH source, results in a deceleration of the increase in the DC conductivity at 500 °C. After the dehydroxylation is completed, alkali metal ions become again the dominant charge carriers. At temperatures above the dehydroxylation region, the DC conductivity slightly decreases with the increasing quartz content. A narrow peak of the DC conductivity observed at 960 °C can be linked to the motion of Al3+ cations into new sites as the metakaolinite collapses. The DC conductivity of different mixtures did not differ significantly. Quartz and grog have lower conductivities than kaolin. Thus, the conduction was determined by the kaolin matrix (60 mass%).

Keywords

DC conductivity Kaolin Quartz Dehydroxylation Dilatometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Constantine the Philosopher University grant agency [UGA VII/17/2018]. Authors are indebted to the ceramic plant PPC Insulators Čab (Slovakia) for the supply of kaolin.

References

  1. 1.
    Liebermann J. About the important correlation between microstructure properties and product quality of strength-stressed high-voltage insulators [Über den wichtigen zusammenhang von gefügeeigenschaften und produktqualität bei festigkeitsbeonspruchten hochsponnungsisolo. Keram Z. 2002;54:858–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liebermann J. Avoiding quartz in alumina porcelain for high-voltage insulators, Part 2. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 2001;80:43–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dal Bó M, Cantavella V, Sanchéz E, Gilabert FA, Boschi AO, Hotza D. An estimate of quartz content and particle size in porcelain tiles from young’s modulus measurements. Ceram Int. 2016;43:2233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Selli NT, Tunali A. Role of the quartz particles on stain resistance of the polished porcelain tiles. Acta Phys Pol, A. 2014;125:506–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliveira APND, Vilches ES, Soler VC, Villegas FAG. Relationship between Young’s modulus and temperature in porcelain tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32:2853–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hlaváč J. Technology of silicates. Praha: SNTL; 1981.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knapek M, Húlan T, Minárik P, Dobroň P, Stubňa I, Stráská J, et al. Study of microcracking in illite-based ceramics during firing. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36:221–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chmelík F, Trník A, Štubňa I, Pešička J. Creation of microcracks in porcelain during firing. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2011;31:2205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanykýř V, Havrda J, Trávníček Z. Specialized technology of ceramics II. Praha: VŠCHT; 1989.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanykýř V, Kutzendörfer J. Technology of ceramics. Praha: Silikátový svaz; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pospíšil Z, Koller A. Fine ceramics: introduction and basics of technology. Praha: SNTL; 1981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pytlík P, Sokolář R. Building ceramics—technology, properties and application. Brno: Akademické nakladatelství CERM, s.r.o; 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yousefi E, Majidi B. Effects of free quartz on mechanical behaviour of kaolinite based geopolymers. Mater Technol. 2011;26:96–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bleaney BI, Bleaney B. Electricity and magnetism. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press; 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halpren A, Erlbach E. Schaum’s outline of beginning physics II. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Štubňa I, Trnovcová V, Vozár L, Csáki Š. Uncertainty of the measurement of DC conductivity of ceramics at elevated temperatures. J Electr Eng. 2015;66:34–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blumenthal RN, Seitz MA. Electrical conductivity in ceramics and glass. In: Tallan NM, editor. Experimental Tech. New York: M. Dekker; 1974.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Podoba R, Trník A, Podobník Ľ. Upgrading of TGA/DTA analyzer derivatograph. Építőanyag. 2012;64:28–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ptáček P, Frajkorová F, Šoukal F, Opravil T. Kinetics and mechanism of three stages of thermal transformation of kaolinite to metakaolinite. Powder Technol. 2014;264:439–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Štubňa I, Varga G, Trník A. Investigation of kaolinite dehydroxylations is still interesting. Epa J Silic Based Compos Mater. 2006;58:6–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ptáček P, Šoukal F, Opravil T, Nosková M, Havlica J, Brandštetr J. The kinetics of Al–Si spinel phase crystallization from calcined kaolin. J Solid State Chem. 2010;183:2565–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frost RL, Vassallo AM. The dehydroxylation of the kaolinite clay minerals using infrared emission spectroscopy. Clays Clay Miner. 1996;44:635–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hosieni KR, Howald RA, Scanlon MW. Thermodynamics of the lambda transition and the equation of state of quartz. Am Miner. 1985;70:782–93.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prjanishnikov VP. System of silica. Leningrad: Strojizdat; 1971.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Podoba R, Štubňa I, Trnovcová V, Trník A. Temperature dependence of DC electrical conductivity of kaolin. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;118:597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang D, Li H, Yi L, Matsuzaki T, Yoshino T. Anisotropy of synthetic quartz electrical conductivity at high pressure and temperature. J Geophys Res. 2010;115:B09211.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Trnovcová V, Podoba R, Štubňa I. DC conductivity of kaolin-based ceramics in the temperature range 20–600 & #xB0;C. Epitoanyag. 2012;2012:46–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsConstantine the Philosopher University in NitraNitraSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Physics of MaterialsCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Institute of Plasma PhysicsThe Czech Academy of SciencesPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations