Advertisement

Evaluation of mixed heat effect of fuel gas and coke in steelmaking flue

  • Jian-bo Xie
  • Jian-an Zhou
  • Xue-kai Jiang
  • Hua Zhang
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

In order to further investigate the effect of coke injection on the total net calorific value of fuel gas, this paper continues to explore the increased essence of calorific value of fuel gas, associated with the previous results of pilot trials in the steel plant. Combined with methods of thermodynamics and mathematics, the calculated calorific values of fuel gas and heat effects in various schemes were compared, evaluated, and discussed. The results show that the ideal total equivalent calorific values of B1, B2, B3, and B4 were − 231,088, − 399,303.5, − 571,043.9, and 3,880,615 J mol−1, respectively, smaller than those of gasification. When the \(\beta_{\rm {i,j}}\) values of CO2 and O2 were 56.65% and 50.5%, respectively, whereas the CO was 16%. The equivalent exothermic heat and absorbed heat were − 144,617.17 J mol−1 and 2.98,807 × 107 J mol−1, respectively. And the \(\Delta Q_{{\rm i,{\text{CO}}}}\) values of schemes 15, 17, and 18 were far more than 3000 kJ Nm−3. Besides, due to small content of oxygen, the heat effect of oxygen was ignored. The increased calorific values of fuel gas in schemes 15, 17, and 18 were 67,282.892, 71,488.073, and 83,052.32 kJ Nm−3, respectively, far more than 60,000 kJ Nm−3. Thus, the total calorific values of fuel gas were greatly improved.

Keywords

Coke injection Fuel gas Thermodynamics and mathematics Calorific value 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Wuhan Iron and Steel Group Echen Iron & Steel Co., Ltd, Hubei, China.

References

  1. 1.
    Nie PY. Analysis of conventional energy supply resource diversity. Appl Therm Eng. 2015;89:663–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleksashin AL, Schnaltzger I, Hollias G. Creation and growth of oxygen converter steelmaking. Metallurgist. 2007;51:60–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xie JB, Zhou JA, Zhang H, Liu ZQ, Tao X, Wang B, Jiang XK, Ni HW. Utilization of waste heat gas in a converter flue for CO generation by coal injection. Energ Fuel. 2017;31:12407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colonna S, Bastianini M, Sisani M, et al. CO2 adsorption and desorption properties of calcined layered double hydroxides. J Therm Anal. 2018;133:869–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Popa A, Sasca V, Verdes O, Suba M, Barvinschi P. Effect of the amine type on thermal stability of modified mesoporous silica used for CO2 adsorption. J Therm Anal. 2018;134:269–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang H, Zhang J, Wang G, Wang Q, Song TF. High-temperature capture of CO2 by Li4SiO4 prepared with blast furnace slag and kinetic analysis. J Therm Anal. 2018;133:981–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang AH, Cai JJ, Li XP, Wang D, Zhou QA. Affecting factors and improving measures for converter gas recovery. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2007;14:22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xie JB, Fu JX, Zhou LH. Fuel enhancement by conversion of hotter waste CO2 in flue gas with coke. Ironmak Steelmak. 2018:1-10.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou JA, Jiang XK, Xie JB, Zhang H, Li L, Wang B, Ni HW. Thermodynamic analysis of improvement of converter gas by injecting pulverized coal into vaporization cooling flue. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2018;25:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozturk F, Keles M, Evrendilek F. Quantifying mass rates and drivers of change in long-term sector and country specific trends of carbon dioxide-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;65:823–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhou JA, Qi DL, Li X. One safe and efficient recovery method for converter gas. Patent of China, 201010151908. 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li Y, Lou WT, Zhu MY. Numerical simulation of gas and liquid flow in steelmaking converter with top and bottom combined blowing. Ironmak Steelmak. 2013;40:505–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris DJ, Roberts DG, Henderson DG. Gasification behaviour of Australian cokes at high temperature and pressure. Fuel. 2006;85:134–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bu Y, Dai X, Lu P. Release characteristics of semi-volatile heavy metals during co-combustion of sewage sludge and coal under the O2/CO2, atmosphere. J Therm Anal. 2018;133:1041–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yue L. Heat transfer calculation of oxygen converter waste heat boiler flue. Energy Conserv Technol. 2012;30:245–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jian-bo Xie
    • 1
  • Jian-an Zhou
    • 1
  • Xue-kai Jiang
    • 1
  • Hua Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Refractories and MetallurgyWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations