Advertisement

Comparative study of heat transfer and friction characteristics of water-based Alumina–copper and Alumina–CNT hybrid nanofluids in laminar flow through pipes

  • M. Shahul Hameed
  • S. Suresh
  • Rajive Kumar Singh
Article

Abstract

In this experimental work, a comparative study of convective heat transfer and drop in pressure characteristics of Alumina–Cu/water and Alumina–CNT/water hybrid nanofluids in fully developed laminar flow in a uniformly heated tube with circular cross section is presented. For this, Alumina–Cu hybrid nanoparticles (90:10 proportion was taken. Below this proportion for, e.g., 80:20, the nanofluid was not stable. Coagulation was happening) were prepared by using a hydrogen reduction technique. Characterization was done for the prepared powder through XRD and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to validate the chemical constitution, to establish the size of the particle and to investigate the morphology of surface. The synthesized Alumina–Cu hybrid nanopowder is dispersed in deionized water in an ultrasonic bath to form a well-dispersed 0.1% volume concentration of hybrid nanofluid. Carbon nanotube (CNT) functionalization was done by acid treatment method to convert the CNT surface from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. Scanning electron microscope was used for characterization of the aluminum oxide particles and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. To prepare 0.1% volume fraction of Alumina–CNT/water nanofluid, required quantities of Alumina powder and functionalized CNT were dispersed in deionized water in 90:10 proportion. Experiments were conducted in the laminar flow range with water, Alumina/water and hybrid nanofluids, and the results obtained have been compared. The convective heat transfer experimental results showed greater enhancement with Alumina–CNT/water hybrid fluid compared to Alumina–Cu/water hybrid fluid. The maximum enhancements of 30.65% and 20.48% in Nusselt number have been obtained for 0.3% volume fraction of Alumina–CNT/water hybrid nanofluid and Alumina–Cu/water hybrid nanofluid, respectively, at Reynolds number of 1350 as compared to the Nusselt number of water.

Keywords

Laminar flow Improvement in heat transfer Friction factor 

Nomenclatures

\(\dot{m}\)

Rate of mass flow

A

Area (m2)

cp

Specific heat (J/kg K)

d

Diameter of test section (m)

f

Friction factor

h

Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

k

Thermal conductivity (W m−1K−1)

L

Length of test section (m)

Nu

Nusselt number (hD/k)

Pr

Prandtl number (μcp/k)

q”

Heat flux (W m−2)

Re

Reynolds number (4m/πdμ)

S

Surface area (m2)

T

Temperature (°C)

v

Velocity of fluid (m s−1)

x

Axial distance from the tube entrance (m)

Greek symbols

p

Drop in pressure (Pa)

μ

Dynamic viscosity (kg m−2 s−1)

ρ

Density (kg m−3)

φ

Volume concentration (%)

Subscripts

exp

Experimental

f

Fluid

I

Inlet

nf

Nanofluid

O

Outlet

pre

Predicted

s

Solid phase

w

Wall

References

  1. 1.
    Choi SUS, Eastman JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. ASME-Publications-Fed 231. 99, 106. 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masuda H, Ebata A, Teramae K. Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles. Dispersion of Alumina, SiO2 and TiO2 ultra-fine particles. Netsu Bussei. 1993;7(4):227–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee S, Choi SS, Li SA, Eastman JA. Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. J Heat Transf. 1999;121(2):280–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eastman JA, Choi SU, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;78(6):718–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pak BC, Cho YI. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp Heat Transf Int J. 1998;11(2):151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xuan Y, Li Q. Investigation on convective heat transfer and flow features of nanofluids. J Heat Transf. 2003;125(1):151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wen D, Ding Y. Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2004;47(24):5181–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang Y, Zhang ZG, Grulke EA, Anderson WB, Wu G. Heat transfer properties of nanoparticle-in-fluid dispersions (nanofluids) in laminar flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2005;48(6):1107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chandrasekar M, Suresh S, Bose AC. Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Alumina/water nanofluid. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2010;34(2):210–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suresh S, Chandrasekar M, Sekhar SC. Experimental studies on heat transfer and friction factor characteristics of CuO/water nanofluid under turbulent flow in a helically dimpled tube. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2011;35(3):542–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ding Y, Alias H, Wen D, Williams RA. Heat transfer of aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes (CNT nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2006;49(1–2):240–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heris SZ, Etemad SG, Esfahany MN. Experimental investigation of oxide nanofluids laminar flow convective heat transfer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33(4):529–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S. Heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop characteristics of TiO2–water nanofluid in a double-tube counter flow heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52(7–8):2059–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hwang KS, Jang SP, Choi SU. Flow and convective heat transfer characteristics of water-based Alumina nanofluids in fully developed laminar flow regime. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52(1–2):193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heris SZ, Esfahany MN, Etemad SGh. Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer of Alumina/water nanofluid in circular tube. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2007;28(2):203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK. Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52(9–10):2189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jena PK, Brocchi EA, Motta MS. In-situ formation of Cu–Alumina nano-scale composites by chemical routes and studies on their microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;313(1–2):180–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oh ST, Lee JS, Sekino T, Niihara K. Fabrication of Cu dispersed Alumina nanocomposites using Alumina/CuO and Alumina/Cu–nitrate mixtures. Scr Mater. 2001;44(8–9):2117–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M. Synthesis of Alumina–Cu/water hybrid nanofluids using two step method and its thermo physical properties. Colloids Surf A. 2011;388(1–3):41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Selvakumar P, Chandrasekar M. Effect of Alumina–Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in heat transfer. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2012;38:54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosca ID, Watari F, Uo M, Akasaka T. Oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by nitric acid. Carbon. 2005;43(15):3124–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keblinski P, Phillpot SR, Choi SU, Eastman JA. Mechanisms of heat flow in suspensions of nano-sized particles (nanofluids). Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2002;45(4):855–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suresh S, Venkitaraj KP, Hameed MS, Sarangan J. Turbulent heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of dilute water based Alumina–Cu hybrid nanofluids. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14(3):2563–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jaiswal AK, Wan M, Singh S, Singh DK, Yadav RR, Singh D, Mishra G. Experimental investigation of thermal conduction in copper–palladium nanofluids. J Nanofluids. 2016;5(4):496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ma J, Jia K, Li W, Zhang S. Investigation the forced convective heat transfer of Mn3O4–water nanofluids in transition region. J Nanofluids. 2016;5(1):186–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee JH, Hwang KS, Jang SP, Lee BH, Kim JH, Choi SU, Choi CJ. Effective viscosities and thermal conductivities of aqueous nanofluids containing low volume concentrations of Alumina nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51(11–12):2651–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xuan Y, Roetzel W. Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2000;43(19):3701–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coleman HW, Steele WG. Experimental and uncertainty analysis for engineers. Hoboken: Wiley; 1989.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ANSI/ASME. Measurement uncertainty. 1-1985. 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Shahul Hameed
    • 1
  • S. Suresh
    • 1
  • Rajive Kumar Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentNational Institute of TechnologyTiruchirappalliIndia

Personalised recommendations