Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 134, Issue 3, pp 1975–1986 | Cite as

Effects of silicoaluminate oxide and coal blending on combustion behaviors and kinetics of zhundong coal under oxy-fuel condition

  • Chang’an Wang
  • Yuanhang Zhang
  • Pengqian Wang
  • Jinping Zhang
  • Yongbo Du
  • Defu CheEmail author


Oxy-fuel combustion of high-alkali coal is beneficial for near-zero emission of pollutants in power plants and has the potential for extensive, efficient, and safe utilization of Zhundong coal in future. The present work was performed on oxy-fuel combustion of Zhundong coal, while the effects of silicoaluminate oxide and coal blending on oxy-fuel combustion characteristics and kinetics of high-alkali coal were further studied using thermogravimetric analysis. The thermogravimetric curves of Zhundong coals present two obvious stages but the contrastive coals are different. The increase in oxygen content weakens the impact of coal property on oxy-fuel combustion behavior of high-alkali coal. The addition of Al2O3 and kaolin results in a slight decline of the peak combustion rate, while the influences of SiO2 and diatomite additives are negligible. The additive fraction of silicoaluminate oxide gives rise to a non-monotonic impact on combustion characteristics of Zhundong coal. The interaction effect within blended coal could cause a reduction in reaction rate during the intense combustion stage, while its influence on kinetics is intensified during the later stage of oxy-fuel combustion. The impact extent of silicoaluminate oxide and coal blending on oxy-fuel combustion kinetics of high-alkali coal is highly associated with additive species and individual coals.


Zhundong coal High alkali Kinetics Thermogravimetric analysis Additive Blended coal 



The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51506163).


  1. 1.
    Xin HH, Wang DM, Dou GL, Qi XY, Xu T, Qi GS. The infrared characterization and mechanism of oxygen adsorption in coal. Spectrosc Lett. 2014;47(9):664–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xin HH, Wang DM, Qi XY, Qi GS, Dou GL. Structural characteristics of coal functional groups using quantum chemistry for quantification of infrared spectra. Fuel Process Technol. 2014;118:287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mathews JP, Miller BG, Song CS, Schobert HH, Botha F, Finkleman RB. The EBB and flow of US coal research 1970–2010 with a focus on academic institutions. Fuel. 2013;105:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou JB, Zhuang XG, Alastuey A, Querol X, Li JH. Geochemistry and mineralogy of coal in the recently explored Zhundong large coal field in the Junggar basin, Xinjiang province, China. Int J Coal Geol. 2010;82(1–2):51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang CA, Jin X, Wang YK, Yan Y, Cui J, Liu YH, et al. Release and transformation of sodium during pyrolysis of Zhundong coals. Energy Fuels. 2015;29(1):78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li GY, Wang CA, Yan Y, Jin X, Liu YH, Che DF. Release and transformation of sodium during combustion of Zhundong coals. J Energy Inst. 2016;89(1):48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li X, Bai ZQ, Bai J, Han YN, Kong LX, Li W. Insight into the effects of sodium species with different occurrence modes on the structural features of residues derived from direct liquefaction of Zhundong coal by multiple techniques. Energy Fuels. 2015;29(11):7142–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li JB, Zhu MM, Zhang ZZ, Zhang K, Shen GQ, Zhang DK. Characterisation of ash deposits on a probe at different temperatures during combustion of a Zhundong lignite in a drop tube furnace. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;144:155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    He Y, Whiddon R, Wang ZH, Liu YZ, Zhu YQ, Liu JZ, et al. Inhibition of sodium release from Zhundong coal via the addition of mineral additives: online combustion measurement with Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS). Energy Fuels. 2017;31(2):1082–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang X, Ingham D, Ma L, Zhou H, Pourkashanian M. Understanding the ash deposition formation in Zhundong lignite combustion through dynamic CFD modelling analysis. Fuel. 2017;194:533–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang ZZ, Zhu MM, Zhang Y, Setyawan HY, Li JB, Zhang DK. Ignition and combustion characteristics of single particles of Zhundong lignite: effect of water and acid washing. Proc Combust Inst. 2017;36(2):2139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molina A, Shaddix CR. Ignition and devolatilization of pulverized bituminous coal particles during oxygen/carbon dioxide coal combustion. Proc Combust Inst. 2007;31(2):1905–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim Y-G, Kim J-D, Lee B-H, Song J-H, Chang Y-J, Jeon C-H. Experimental investigation into combustion characteristics of two sub-bituminous coals in O2/N2 and O2/CO2 environments. Energy Fuels. 2010;24:6034–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kiga T, Takano S, Kimura N, Omata K, Okawa M, Mori T, et al. Characteristics of pulverized-coal combustion in the system of oxygen/recycled flue gas combustion. Energy Convers Manag. 1997;38(Supplement 1):S129–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smart J, Lu G, Yan Y, Riley G. Characterisation of an oxy-coal flame through digital imaging. Combust Flame. 2010;157(6):1132–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ca Wang, Zhang X, Liu Y, Che D. Pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of coals in oxyfuel combustion. Appl Energy. 2012;97:264–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu C, Qu SJ, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang YH. Distribution, occurrence and leaching dynamic behavior of sodium in Zhundong coal. Fuel. 2017;190:189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang CA, Liu YH, Jin X, Che DF. Effect of water washing on reactivities and NOx emission of Zhundong coals. J Energy Inst. 2016;89(4):636–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang ZH, Liu YZ, Whiddon R, Wan KD, He Y, Xia J, et al. Measurement of atomic sodium release during pyrolysis and combustion of sodium-enriched Zhundong coal pellet. Combust Flame. 2017;176:429–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang HX, Guo XW, Zhu ZP. Effect of temperature on gasification performance and sodium transformation of Zhundong coal. Fuel. 2017;189:301–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Song WJ, Song GL, Qi XB, Yang SB, Lu QG, Nowak W. Speciation and distribution of sodium during Zhundong coal gasification in a circulating fluidized bed. Energy Fuels. 2017;31(2):1889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Song GL, Song WJ, Qi XB, Yang SB. Effect of the air-preheated temperature on sodium transformation during Zhundong coal gasification in a circulating fluidized bed. Energy Fuels. 2017;31(4):4461–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li X, Bai ZQ, Bai J, Han YN, Kong LX, Li W. Transformations and roles of sodium species with different occurrence modes in direct liquefaction of Zhundong coal from Xinjiang, Northwestern China. Energy Fuels. 2015;29(9):5633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ge HJ, Shen LH, Gu HM, Song T, Jiang SX. Combustion performance and sodium absorption of ZhunDong coal in a CLC process with hematite oxygen carrier. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;94:40–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ge HJ, Shen LH, Gu HM, Song T, Jiang SX. Combustion performance and sodium transformation of high-sodium ZhunDong coal during chemical looping combustion with hematite as oxygen carrier. Fuel. 2015;159:107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou B, Zhou H, Wang JY, Cen KF. Effect of temperature on the sintering behavior of Zhundong coal ash in oxy-fuel combustion atmosphere. Fuel. 2015;150:526–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yao YX, Jin J, Liu DY, Wang YZ, Kou XS, Lin YY. Evaluation of vermiculite in reducing ash deposition during the combustion of high-calcium and high-sodium Zhundong coal in a drop-tube furnace. Energy Fuels. 2016;30(4):3488–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li MQ, Zhang ZX, Wu XJ, Fan JJ. Experiment and mechanism study on the effect of Kaolin on melting characteristics of Zhundong coal ash. Energy Fuels. 2016;30(9):7763–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu H. Combustion of coal chars in O2/CO2 and O2/N2 mixtures: a comparative study with non-isothermal thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) tests. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:4278–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Q, Zhao C, Chen X, Wu W, Li Y. Comparison of pulverized coal combustion in air and in O2/CO2 mixtures by thermo-gravimetric analysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2009;85(1–2):521–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Meriste T, Yoruk CR, Trikkel A, Kaljuvee T, Kuusik R. TG-FTIR analysis of oxidation kinetics of some solid fuels under oxy-fuel conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;114(2):483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rathnam RK, Elliott LK, Wall TF, Liu Y, Moghtaderi B. Differences in reactivity of pulverised coal in air (O2/N2) and oxy-fuel (O2/CO2) conditions. Fuel Process Technol. 2009;90(6):797–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang GL, Zander R, Costa M. Oxy-fuel combustion characteristics of pulverized-coal in a drop tube furnace. Fuel. 2014;115:452–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu H, Zailani R, Gibbs BM. Comparisons of pulverized coal combustion in air and in mixtures of O2/CO2. Fuel. 2005;84(7–8):833–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kok MV. Temperature-controlled combustion and kinetics of different rank coal samples. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;79(1):175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kok MV. Recent developments in the application of thermal analysis techniques in fossil fuels. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;91(3):763–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kok MV, Pokol G, Keskin C, Madarasz J, Bagci S. Combustion characteristics of lignite and oil shale samples by thermal analysis techniques. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2004;76(1):247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ozbas KE, Kok MV, Hicyilmaz C. Comparative kinetic analysis of raw and cleaned coals. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2002;69(2):541–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Burnham AK. Computational aspects of kinetic analysis. Part D: the ICTAC kinetics project—multi-thermal-history model-fitting methods and their relation to isoconversional methods. Thermochim Acta. 2000;355(1–2):165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM, Perez-Maqueda LA, Popescu C, Sbirrazzuoli N. ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta. 2011;520(1–2):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang Ca DuY, Che D. Reactivities of coals and synthetic model coal under oxy-fuel conditions. Thermochim Acta. 2013;553:8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang C, Liu Y, Zhang X, Che D. A study on coal properties and combustion characteristics of blended coals in Northwestern China. Energy Fuels. 2011;25(8):3634–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang C, Han T, Du Y, Liu Y, Che D. Diffusional effects on differences of coal char reactivity between air and oxy-fuel combustion in thermogravimetric experiments. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2016;125(2):897–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang’an Wang
    • 1
  • Yuanhang Zhang
    • 1
  • Pengqian Wang
    • 1
  • Jinping Zhang
    • 1
  • Yongbo Du
    • 1
  • Defu Che
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power Engineering, School of Energy and Power EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations