Advertisement

Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) induced modification of optical and magnetic properties of M-type nickel doped barium hexaferrite

  • S. Shah
  • O. P. Pandey
  • J. Mohammed
  • A. K. Srivastava
  • A. Gupta
  • D. BasandraiEmail author
Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials for dielectric, electronic, magnetic and ferroelectric applications
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, a heterostructure of Ni doped M-type hexaferrite i.e., BaNi0.2Fe11.8O19 (BNFO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has been prepared to understand its effect on the optical and magnetic properties of BNFO. Here, the preparation of both the components was carried out through sol–gel (followed by heat treatment) and modified Hummer’s method, respectively. The confirmation of phase formation was confirmed with XRD results and spectroscopic techniques (FTIR and Raman) were used to monitor the structural variation occurred as a result of attachment of BNFO and RGO. Further, vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) and absorbance spectroscopy (UV–visible) were carried out to understand the effect of attachment. VSM study suggested the decrement of saturation magnetization, coercivity, and retentivity as a result of RGO addition in BNFO which might be associated to the soft magnetic characteristics of RGO. While, such synergistic heterojunction induced excellent visible absorption of prepared samples enabling its applicability in optical devices.

Highlights

  • A successful synthesis of rGO attached Ni-doped barium hexaferrite.

  • Raman and FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the attachment.

  • The optical analysis suggested the applicability of prepared samples as optical sensors and photocatalysts.

Keywords

Nanocrystalline barium hexaferrites Reduced graphene oxide Magnetic and optical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors (OPP and AG) are thankful to School of Physics and Materials Science, TIET, Patiala for providing VSM analysis through DST-FIST service.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chavan VC, Shirsath SE, Mane ML, Kadam RH, More SS (2016) Transformation of hexagonal to mixed spinel crystal structure and magnetic properties of Co2+ substituted BaFe12O19. J Magn Magn Mater 398:32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mosleh Z, Kameli P, Poorbaferani A, Ranjbar M, Salamati H (2016) Structural, magnetic and microwave absorption properties of Ce-doped barium hexaferrite. J Magn Magn Mater 397:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang Q, Xu N, Song J (2015) XAFS and XPS studies on site occuptions of Sm3+ ions in Sm doped M-type BaFe12O19. J Magn Magn Mater 377:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shams MH, Rozatian ASH, Yousefi MH, Valíček J, Šepelák V (2016) Effect of Mg2+ and Ti4+ dopants on structural, magnetic and high-frequency ferromagnetic properties of barium hexaferrite. J Magn Magn Mater 399:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murtaza RG, Iqbal MA, Kubra KT (2010) Effect of Ho3+ substitutions on the structural and magnetic properties of BaFe12O19 hexaferrites. J Alloy Compd 495:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pullar RC (2012) Hexagonal ferrite’s; a review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics. Prog Mater Sci 57(7):1191–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dixit G, Singh JP, Srivastava RC, Agrawal HM (2012) Magnetic resonance study of Ce and Gd doped NiFe2O4 nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 324:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rafiq MA, Waqar M, Muhammad QK, Waleed M, Saleem M, Anwar MS (2017) Conduction mechanism andmagnetic behavior of Cu doped barium hexaferrite ceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 46:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawar N, Chitkara M, Sandhu IS, Jolly JS, Malhotra S (2016) Structural, magnetic and dielectric properties of pure and nickel-doped barium nanohexaferrites synthesized using chemical co-precipitation technique. Cogent Phys 3:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu Y, Wang X (2011) Magnetically separable ZnFe2O4–graphene catalyst and its high photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:7210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang X, Zhang X, Ma Y, Huang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y (2009) Superparamagnetic graphene oxide–Fe3O4 nanoparticles hybrid for controlled targeted drug carriers. J Mater Chem 19:2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun H, Cao L, Lu L (2011) Magnetite/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites: one step solvothermal synthesis and use as a novel platform for removal of dye pollutants. Nano Res 4:550–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ji Z, Shen X, Zhu G, Zhou H, Yuan A (2012) Reduced graphene oxide/nickel nanocomposites: facile synthesis, magnetic and catalytic properties. J Mater Chem 22:3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos S, Grigorieva IV, Firsov A (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim KS, Zhao Y, Jang H, Lee SY, Kim JM, Kim KS, Ahn JH, Kim P, Choi JY, Hong BH (2009) Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457:706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schniepp HC, Li JL, McAllister MJ, Sai H, Herrera-Alonso M, Adamson DH, Prud’homme RK, Car R, Saville DA, Aksay IA (2006) Functionalized single graphene sheets derived from splitting graphite oxide. J Phys Chem B 2006:110, 8535Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reina A, Jia XT, Ho J, Nezich D, Son HB, Bulovic V, Dresselhaus MS, Kong J (2009) Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett 9:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen TS, Ruoff RS (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45:1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fan XB, Peng WC, Li Y, Li XY, Wang SL, Zhang GL, Zhang FB (2008) Deoxygenation of exfoliated graphite oxide under alkaline conditions: a green route to graphene preparation. Adv Mater 20:4490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li D, Muller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallace GG (2008) Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 3:101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hummers WS, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80(6):1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohammed J, Carol TT, Hafeez HY, Basandrai D, Bhadu GR, Godara SK, Narang SB, Srivastava AK (2019) Lightweight SrM/CCTO/rGO nanocomposites for optoelectronics and Ku band microwave absorption. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 30:4026–4040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee JK, Smith KB, Hayner CM, Kung HH (2010) Silicon nanoparticles–graphene paper composites for Li ion battery anodes. Chem Commun 46(12):2025–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ding JN, Liu YB, Yuan NY, Ding GQ, Fan Y, Yu CT (2012) The influence of temperature, time and concentration on the dispersion of reduced graphene oxide prepared by hydrothermal reduction. Diam Relat Mater 21:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vinnik DA, Zherebtsov DA, Nemrava S, Semisalova AS, Galimov DM, Gudkova SA, Chumanov IV, Niewa IR (2015) Growth, structural and magnetic characterization of Co- and Ni-substituted barium hexaferrite single crystals. J Alloy Compd 628:480–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ji Z, Shen X, Zhu G, Zhou H, Yuan A (2011) Reduced graphene oxide/nickel nanocomposites: facile synthesis, magnetic and catalytic properties. J Mater Chem 22:3471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Basandrai D, Bedi RK, Dhami A, Sharma J, Narang SB, Pubby K, Gupta A, Srivastava A(2018) Aluminum and chromium substituted Z-type hexaferrites for antenna and microwave absorber applications. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol 85:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharma M, Jamdagni P, Kumar A, Ahluwalia PK (2016) Interactions of gas molecules with monolayer MoSe2: a first principle study. AIP Conf Proc 1731:10–14Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kothari D, Reddy VR, Sathe VG, Gupta A, Banerjee A, Awasthi AM (2007) Raman scattering study of polycrystalline magnetoelectric BiFeO3. J Magn Magn Mater 320:548–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mukherjee A, Chakrabarty S, Kumari N, Su WN, Basu S (2018) Visible-light-mediated electrocatalytic activity in reduced graphene oxide-supported bismuth ferrite. ACS Omega 3(6):5946–5957.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0070. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhargava R, Khan S (2017) Effect of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) on structural, optical, and dielectric properties of Mg(OH)2/rGO nanocomposites. Adv Powder Technol 28(11):2812–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Feng J, Pu F, Li Z, Li X, Hu X, Bai J (2016) Interfacial interactions and synergistic effect of CoNi nanocrystals and nitrogen-doped graphene in a composite microwave absorber. Carbon 104:214–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gupta A, Pandey OP (2019) NbC/C heterojunction for efficient photodegradation of methylene blue under visible irradiation. Sol Energy 183:398–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sun XC, Dong XL (2002) Magnetic properties and microstructure of carbon encapsulated Ni nanoparticles and pure Ni nanoparticles coated with NiO layer. Mater Res Bull 37:991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chawla SK, Mudsainiyan RK, Meena SS (2014) Sol–gel synthesis, structural and magnetic properties of nanoscale M-type barium hexaferrites BaCoxZrxFe(12−2x)O19. J Magn Magn Mater 350:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaur P, Chawla SK, Narang SB, Pubby K (2016) Effect of Cu-Co-Zr doping on the properties of strontium hexaferrites synthesized by sol–gel auto-combustion method. J Supercond Novel Magn 30:635–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gupta A, Mittal M, Singh MK, Suib SL, Pandey OP (2018) Low temperature synthesis of NbC/C nano-composites as visible light photoactive catalyst. Sci Rep. 8:13597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rosy A, KALPANA G (2018) Influence of RGO/TiO2 nanocomposite on photo-degrading Rhodamine B and Rose Bengal dye pollutants. Bull Mater Sci 41:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mittal M, Sharma M, Pandey OP (2016) Fast and quick degradation properties of doped and capped ZnO nanoparticles under UV–visible light radiations. Sol Energy 125:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, School of Chemical Engineering and Physical SciencesLovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia
  2. 2.School of Physics and Material ScienceThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations