Advertisement

Novel Zr–Cu–Fe nanocomposite metal oxides: structural, magnetic and composition activity effects on photodegradation of phenols

  • Mohammed A. Wahba
  • Abdelrahman A. BadawyEmail author
Original Paper: Sol-gel and hybrid materials with surface modification for applications
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Pure CuFe2O4 nanoparticles were synthesized using sol–gel method technique. Effect of Zr/Cu substitution (Cu1−xZrx, where x = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00) on the structural, morphological, and magnetic properties was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX), infrared Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The photocatalytic behavior of pure CuFe2O4 as well Zr-substituted samples was investigated for degradation of phenol in aqueous solution in the presence of ultraviolet irradiation. The XRD results of pure CuFe2O4 confirmed the formation of single tetragonal structure phase, while introducing zirconium in the structural composition resulted in a decrease in the crystallinity and gradual disappearance of the cuprospinel phase accompanied with appearance of single metal oxides species (Fe2O3, ZrO2, Cu4O3). Based on the scanning (SEM–EDX), the samples consist of agglomerated particles with varying sizes and shapes related to their compositions. The magnetic hysteresis loops of all samples exhibited room temperature ferromagnetism with variable shapes, saturation magnetization, and coercivity values. All samples showed a significant photocatalytic activity when irradiated with ultraviolet light. The highest photocatalytic efficiency (92%) for phenol degradation was achieved through the 25% Zr-substituted sample under irradiation time of 150 min.

Highlights

  • Novel Zr–Cu–Fe metal oxide nanocomposites were synthesized using sol–gel technique.

  • Effect of Zr/Cu substitution percentage on the structural, morphological, and magnetic properties was investigated.

  • The photocatalytic activity of the nanocomposites was also investigated.

  • A significant photocatalytic activity enhancement toward phenol degradation was achieved through Zr/Cu substitution especially at 25%.

Keywords

Copper ferrite Cu4O3 Zr/Cu substitution Phenol degradation ferromagnetism Sol–gel synthesis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Gleick PH (2002) Dirty-water: estimated deaths from water-related diseases 2000–2020 Oakland: Pacific Institute for studies in Development, environment, and security. pp. 1–12Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brostow W et al. (2009) Polymeric flocculants for wastewater and industrial effluent treatment. J Mater Educ 31(3–4):157–166Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta VK et al. (2012) Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—an overview. RSC Adv 2:6380–6388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciabattia I et al. (2009) Demonstration of a treatment system for purification and reuse of laundry wastewater. Desalination 245(1–3):451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannan S, Dubey A, Knozinger H (2005) Synthesis and characterization of CuMgAl ternary hydrotalcites as catalysts for the hydroxylation of phenol. J Catal 231(2):381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santos A et al. (2006) Wet oxidation of phenol, cresols and nitrophenols catalyzed by activated carbon in acid and basic media. Appl Catal B 65(3):269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kulkarni SJ, Kaware JP (2013) Review on research for removal of phenol from wastewater. Int J Sci Res Publ 3(4):1–5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Villegas LGC et al. (2016) A short review of techniques for phenol removal from wastewater. Curr Pollut Rep 2(3):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu L, Chen B, Shen X (2000) Sorption of phenol, p-nitrophenol, and aniline to dual-cation organobentonites from water. Environ Sci Technol 34(3):468–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mallek M et al. (2018) Granulated cork as biosorbent for the removal of phenol derivatives and emerging contaminants. J Environ Manag 223:576–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu Z et al. (2018) Enzyme-assisted extraction of polyphenol from edible lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) rhizome knot: ultra-filtration performance and HPLC-MS2 profile. Food Res Int 111:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rezakazemi M, Maghami M, Mohammadi T (2018) Wastewaters treatment containing phenol and ammonium using aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor. Chem Cent J 12(1):79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu D et al. (2019) Feasibility and energy consumption analysis of phenol removal from salty wastewater by electro-electrodialysis. Sep Purif Technol 215:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Védrine J (2017) Heterogeneous catalysis on metal oxides. Catalysts 7(11):341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sudha D, Sivakumar P (2015) Review on the photocatalytic activity of various composite catalysts. Chem Eng Process 97:112–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wahba MA, Yakout SM (2019) Innovative visible light photocatalytic activity for V-doped ZrO2 structure: optical, morphological, and magnetic properties. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 92(3):628–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adhikari S, Sarkar D (2015) Metal oxide semiconductors for dye degradation. Mater Res Bull 72:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen X et al. (2015) The synthesis of ZnO/SnO2 porous nanofibers for dye adsorption and degradation. Dalton Trans 44(7):3034–3042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gnanasekaran L et al. (2017) Synthesis and characterization of metal oxides (CeO2, CuO, NiO, Mn3O4, SnO2 and ZnO) nanoparticles as photo catalysts for degradation of textile dyes. J Photochem Photobiol B 173:43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reddy LH et al. (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Chem Rev 112(11):5818–5878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Linsebigler AL, Lu G, Yates Jr JT (1995) Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem Rev 95(3):735–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nawle AC et al. (2017) Deposition, characterization, magnetic and optical properties of Zn doped CuFe2O4 thin films. J Alloy Compd 695:1573–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shahbaz Tehrani F et al. (2012) Structural, magnetic, and optical properties of zinc- and copper-substituted nickel ferrite nanocrystals. J Supercond Nov Magn 25(7):2443–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kefeni KK, Mamba BB, Msagati TA (2017) Application of spinel ferrite nanoparticles in water and wastewater treatment: a review. Sep Purif Technol 188:399–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nidheesh P (2015) Heterogeneous Fenton catalysts for the abatement of organic pollutants from aqueous solution: a review. Rsc Adv 5(51):40552–40577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gubbala S et al. (2004) Magnetic properties of nanocrystalline Ni–Zn, Zn–Mn, and Ni–Mn ferrites synthesized by reverse micelle technique. Phys B 348(1-4):317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saafan S et al. (2010) AC and DC conductivity of NiZn ferrite nanoparticles in wet and dry conditions. J Magn Magn Mater 322(16):2369–2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singhal S, Chandra K (2007) Cation distribution and magnetic properties in chromium-substituted nickel ferrites prepared using aerosol route. J Solid State Chem 180(1):296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang F et al. (2015) Zinc ferrite catalysts for ozonation of aqueous organic contaminants: phenol and bio-treated coking wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 156:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ding Y et al. (2013) Sulfate radicals induced degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A with nanoscaled magnetic CuFe2O4 as a heterogeneous catalyst of peroxymonosulfate. Appl Catal B 129:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang H et al. (2017) Reuse of Fenton sludge as an iron source for NiFe2O4 synthesis and its application in the Fenton-based process. J Environ Sci 53:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roonasi P, Nezhad AY (2016) A comparative study of a series of ferrite nanoparticles as heterogeneous catalysts for phenol removal at neutral pH. Mater Chem Phys 172:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cullity B, Stock Sá (1978) Elements of x-ray diffraction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fagal GA et al. (2012) Effect of La2O3-treatment on textural and solid–solid interactions in ferric/cobaltic oxides system. J Solid State Chem 194:162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    El‐Shobaky GA et al. (2009) Catalytic oxidation of CO by O2 over nanosized CuO–ZnO system prepared under various conditions. Can J Chem Eng 87(5):792–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ghanem A et al. (2014) Photocatalytic activity of hyperbranched polyester/TiO2 nanocomposites. Applied. Catal A 472:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rehim MHA et al. (2016) Photocatalytic activity and antimicrobial properties of paper sheets modified with TiO2/Sodium alginate nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 148:194–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prince E, Treuting R (1956) The structure of tetragonal copper ferrite. Acta Crystallogr 9(12):1025–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mexmain J (1971) Contribution a l’etude du ferrite cuivreux et de ses solutions solides avec le ferrite cuivrique. Annales de Chimie. Vol 1971. pp. 297–308Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mazen S (2000) Tetravalent ions substitution in Cu–ferrite; structure formation and electrical properties. Mater Chem Phys 62(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cross WB et al. (1999) Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of ferrites MFe2O4 (M = Mg, Ba, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn); reactions in an external magnetic field. J Mater Chem 9(10):2545–2552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Finger LW, Hazen RM (1980) Crystal structure and isothermal compression of Fe2O3, Cr2O3, and V2O3 to 50 kbars. J Appl Phys 51(10):5362–5367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suzuki-Muresan T et al. (2010) Minimization of absorption contrast for accurate amorphous phase quantification: application to ZrO2 nanoparticles. J Appl Crystallogr 43(5):1092–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    O'keeffe M, Bovin J (1978) The crystal structure of paramelaconite Cu4O3. Am Mineral 63(1–2):180–185Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bondars B et al. (1995) Powder diffraction investigations of plasma sprayed zirconia. J Mater Sci 30(6):1621–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCullough Jt, Trueblood K (1959) The crystal structure of baddeleyite (monoclinic ZrO2). Acta Crystallogr 12(7):507–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kröger FA (1964) The chemistry of imperfect crystals. North-Holland Pub, CoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sargent W (1980) Table of periodic properties of the elements. Sargent-Welch Scientific, Skokie, ILGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wahba MA, Mohamed W, Hanna AA (2016) Sol-gel synthesis, characterization of Fe/ZrO2 nanocomposites and their photodegradation activity on indigo carmine and methylene blue textile dyes. Int J ChemTech Res 9(5):914–925Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krinsley DH et al. (2005) Backscattered scanning electron microscopy and image analysis of sediments and sedimentary rocks. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zeynizadeh B, Gholamiyan E, Gilanizadeh M (2018) Magnetically recoverable CuFe2O4 nanoparticles as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for green formylation of alcohols. Current Chem Lett 7(4):121–130Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peymanfar R, Azadi F, Yassi Y (2018) Preparation and characterization of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles by the sol-gel method and investigation of its microwave absorption properties at Ku-band frequency using silicone rubber. In Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings. Vol. 2, p. 1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhao J et al. (2012) Magnetic and electrochemical properties of CuFe2O4 hollow fibers fabricated by simple electrospinning and direct annealing. CrystEngComm 14(18):5879–5885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Raul PK et al. (2014) CuO nanorods: a potential and efficient adsorbent in water purification. RSC Adv 4(76):40580–40587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dharmaraj N, Kim C, Kim H (2006) Synthesis and characterisation of zirconium oxide nanofibers by electrospinning. Synth Reactivity Inorg, Met-Org Nano-Met Chem 36(1):29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ranjbar M et al. (2012) Preparation and characterization of tetragonal zirconium oxide nanocrystals from isophthalic acid-zirconium (IV) nanocomposite as a new precursor. International. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8(4):191–196Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cullity BD, Graham CD (2011) Introduction to magnetic materials. IEEE Press, John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tehrani FS et al. (2012) Structural, magnetic, and optical properties of zinc-and copper-substituted nickel ferrite nanocrystals. J Supercond Nov Magn 25(7):2443–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hu C, Gao Z, Yang X (2008) One-pot low temperature synthesis of MFe2O4 (M = Co, Ni, Zn) superparamagnetic nanocrystals. J Magn Magn Mater 320(8):L70–L73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sun S et al. (2004) Monodisperse mfe2o4 (m = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 126(1):273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kale A, Gubbala S, Misra R (2004) Magnetic behavior of nanocrystalline nickel ferrite synthesized by the reverse micelle technique. J Magn Magn Mater 277(3):350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Faheem M et al. (2018) Synthesis of Cu2O–CuFe2O4 microparticles from Fenton sludge and its application in the Fenton process: the key role of Cu2O in the catalytic degradation of phenol. RSC Adv 8(11):5740–5748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Xu C et al. (2010) Preparation of ZnO/Cu2O compound photocatalyst and application in treating organic dyes. J Hazard Mater 176(1-3):807–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lee DW, Yoo BR (2014) Advanced metal oxide (supported) catalysts: synthesis and applications. J Ind Eng Chem 20(6):3947–3959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Murali DS, Aryasomayajula S (2018) Thermal conversion of Cu4O3 into CuO and Cu2O and the electrical properties of magnetron sputtered Cu4O3 thin films. Appl Phys A 124(3):279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fan Z-J et al. (2010) Facile synthesis of graphene nanosheets via Fe reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. ACS nano 5(1):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    López U et al. (2019) Synthesis and characterization of ZnO-ZrO2 nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of phenol. J Nanomater 2019(3):1–12.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Tian G et al. (2009) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of S-doped TiO2–ZrO2 nanoparticles under visible-light irradiation. J Hazard Mater 166(2–3):939–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inorganic Chemistry DepartmentNational Research CentreDokkiEgypt
  2. 2.Physical Chemistry Department, Division of Inorganic Chemical Industries and Mineral ResourcesNational Research CentreDokkiEgypt

Personalised recommendations